No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I have the QS1 and the Platnium, entry level credit steps cards. Both are exactly 12 months old as of December 23, 2016. I received CLI's at 3 months and 6 months, as expected from researching these forums. For the better part of 6 months, I carried a balance on both cards resulting in a UTI of 40-50%. For the last 3 months, I have quadrupled my monthly payments on both cards and for my most recent payment, I dropped a larger $500 payment on each card which signifcantly helped the UTI and balances into the 'green'. On December 24, I hit the 'luv' button on the website. It came back with the '2-3 day message'. Immediately checking my documents in the message center, there were denial reason letters for each card. The reason: "Monthly payments too low". Note: I have never paid only the monthly minimum. Never. I have always doubled, tripled or quadrupled the payments from day one. Plus, as mentioned, the large $500 payments before the last statements cut in December. I honestly don't have an opinion about these denials but just wanted to share the data points leading to the denials. As you will see, I think that the reason for the denial is more so for having a more than 40% UTI and carrying a high balance. The defined reason (monthly payments too low) seem a bit misleading, as they weren't in my eyes. It does however translate in denial purposes that I have carried too high of a balance for their taste. I just wanted to provide these data points for anyone that gets the same message from Capital One. My plan is to pay a couple of hundred more on each card before the 13th statement cuts in January and try again.
Time line (QS1 & Plat nearly identical usage/payments):
Day 0: >>> Operned $300 SL / $0 BAL
Day 91: >>> CLI to $750 / $300 BAL
Day 181: >>> CLI to $1300 / $700 BAL
Day 366: >>> CLI Denial / $751 BAL
Reasons given for denials from any creditor, not just Capital One can literally be anything they want it to be. They can throw a dart at a dartboard of reasons and just give you whatever one. Sometimes they make no sense so I put no value in them at all.
My last reason for a CLI denial from CO was that I wasn't showing enough usage with my current limit, or something to that tone when I had put $1000-$2000 through the card multiple months. Yet there are people that put $10-$20 through the card for several months and get a CLI just fine. Clearly that doesn't make sense.
I think all reasons for denials should be eliminated and simply say "There's something about your profile that we don't like right now so you aren't getting a CLI." They may as well keep it vague rather than give some BS answer.
@Anonymous wrote:Reasons given for denials from any creditor, not just Capital One can literally be anything they want it to be. They can throw a dart at a dartboard of reasons and just give you whatever one. Sometimes they make no sense so I put no value in them at all.
My last reason for a CLI denial from CO was that I wasn't showing enough usage with my current limit, or something to that tone when I had put $1000-$2000 through the card multiple months. Yet there are people that put $10-$20 through the card for several months and get a CLI just fine. Clearly that doesn't make sense.
I think all reasons for denials should be eliminated and simply say "There's something about your profile that we don't like right now so you aren't getting a CLI." They may as well keep it vague rather than give some BS answer.
So true. Maybe they should start giving the actual reasons so that people can learn how to manage their credit lines with the creditors.
That would certainly be nice, that's for sure!