No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
If you get approved for a higher tier Capital One Card like Quicksilver, Venture, or Savor, you would have been approved and received a higher starting limit for the card directly below (Quicksilver One, Savor One, Venture One) because the qualifications are lower. Is this correct?
Thanks for your input.
Yes

While UW is tighter for their higher "credit level" cards, I don't see any reason to believe the SL is determined differently.
My 2 starters Plat/QS and QS1 were both SL's of $2000. After a year. Venture, then QS, and lastly Savor 14 month period they were all approved for 10g's each. There was no 6 month app limit then. But things have changed since 2015-16. Minimun on QS SL was 5g's and Venture/Savor was 10g's average back then. Now QS apps get approved for lower SL's. For the sake of argument. As we say. YMMV.
















From personal experience, the top tier cards are offered higher limits. Seems like the product really determines limits. When I PC'ed to the Venture and even the Venture One from the QS1 was when I really started to see decent increases from Cap1. I think a lot of people who complain about Cap1 never increasing their limit stick to entry level prodcuts such as their Plat MC when they probably need to do a PC to a higher tier card first....of course YMMV....I was just approved for a Savor One with the bare min of $1k while my other two QS1's started out at $3500 and are now a Venture WMC and a QS WMC with $12k and $6.5k limits.