cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

It sounds like the CSRs are now being told to not offer the non contactless version anymore. But here's the thing, if that's the case the CSRs should say that the non contactless functionality is no longer available for the Rose Gold and not that it doesn't exist because that's a lie...which looks bad on AMEX's part because now you are a brand who lies to your consumers.

 


@Streetervillelady wrote:

@Anonymous wrote:

No effort at all. The day the card came out I requested a non-contactless Rose Gold card and it was expedited in two days. Doesn't sound like a lot of effort to me...

 


@Loquat wrote:

Sure seems like a lot of effort...hope it's worth it all in the end.  


 


I did too, TWICE.  I should have asked for your CSR. Smiley Happy 


 

Message 11 of 62
AverageJoesCredit
Legendary Contributor

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

Make love not war #GotRoseGoldSmiley Wink
Message 12 of 62
staticvoidmain
Established Contributor

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"


@Anonymous wrote:

Here's my non-contactless Rose Gold card. #SmokeandGun


Thanks for posting. Does it have a heavier feel to it? I think my personal reason for wanting to request one is just the feel to it if it is indeed one solid piece of metal like the non-contactless Platinum.

Message 13 of 62
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"


@Streetervillelady wrote:

@Anonymous wrote:

What is wrong with a contactless card?  Can you still use your plastic card? I would say nevermind at this point and just ask to reactivate the plastic one. 


That's exactly what the AMEX CSR asked.  I advised her that the question was not a good look!

 

I prefer non-contact less for security reasons.  No, the plastic card was deactivated. I'm actually taking one for the Myfico team.  Several people have posted that AMEX CSR's are saying non-contact less is not possible.  But at least one poster received one.  If this process works, others will know they can request the card they want.


Personally I consider it no worse than chip and signature from a security perspective. If PIN were required when inserting and not required when tapping, on the other hand, it might be different.

 

That does make me wonder though--perhaps AmEx was getting a lot of requests for the non-contactless version and decided to kill it before it threatened their push for contactless? There is a fair bit of baggage from the last time banks tried to push it, after all.

Message 14 of 62
Shadowfactor
Valued Contributor

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

Since everyone seems to be interested in the feel or weight of the non-contactless version.

@jude Is there actually any difference ? How is the feel compared to platinum or CSP ??

It’s my personal opinion that the non-contactless is still going to be lighter and not as thick as the platinum. Part of the allure of the platinum is the heavy card for a decent amount of users. And this is the best way to get a metal card for most people through the Amex gold.




Total Revolving Limits $254,800

Message 15 of 62
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

No problem. I don't have a contactless version of the Gold/Rose to compare it to, but it feels slightly heavier than my CSP but it's only noticeable if you hold both cards in different hands at the same time. Yesterday I did go out for Ramen and the cashier dropped my card on the counter (I was sort of mad) and it made a light clink noise which I never got out of my CSP.

 

I think besides that, I like that the contactless symbol isn't on it because something about the "open space" on this card adds to the asthetic and it makes it look cleaner, and in turn more prestigious, IMO. Also, the material feels sturdier than I thought it would.

 

One thing I considered is if the discontinue of the non contactless Rose Gold is an attempt at maintaining the prestige of the Platinum since some people, who aren't the targeted demographic for the Platinum, just got it because it's weight and prestige. Just a thought. Regardless, it sucks that AMEX is taking the ability to choose away Smiley Sad

 


@staticvoidmain wrote:

@Anonymous wrote:

Here's my non-contactless Rose Gold card. #SmokeandGun


Thanks for posting. Does it have a heavier feel to it? I think my personal reason for wanting to request one is just the feel to it if it is indeed one solid piece of metal like the non-contactless Platinum.


 

Message 16 of 62
CreditCuriosity
Moderator Emeritus

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

Keep thread on topic of contactless or lack there of; not weight or this thread will end up in smorgs.  Thanks

Message 17 of 62
FinStar
Moderator Emeritus

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"

So, aside from aesthetics and the "feel" of purported heftiness, is there really a major issue with the contactless version that folks have a gripe? I guess at the end of the day, how is this life changing that can help others or even AmEx? They certainly seem to be responsive and accommodating given the recent demands and introduction of a new material for this card.

I've yet to see any major articles citing any imminent breach would occur with contactless CCs, plastic or otherwise.

Regardless whether contactless/non-contactless, a variety of fraud instances and losses are attributed with cards not even being present 🤷‍♂️
Message 18 of 62
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"


@FinStar wrote:
So, aside from aesthetics and the "feel" of purported heftiness, is there really a major issue with the contactless version that folks have a gripe? I guess at the end of the day, how is this life changing that can help others or even AmEx? They certainly seem to be responsive and accommodating given the recent demands and introduction of a new material for this card.

I've yet to see any major articles citing any imminent breach would occur with contactless CCs, plastic or otherwise.

Regardless whether contactless/non-contactless, a variety of fraud instances and losses are attributed with cards not even being present 🤷‍♂️

 

I feel like I just entered an alternate universe.  If the reason for requesting a non-contactless card is about esthetics; I'd think that the EMV chip spoils the look of the card far more that a discreet NFC symbol.

Message 19 of 62
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: AMEX Rose Gold Non-Contact Less - "What we have here is a failure to communicate"


@Streetervillelady wrote:

@Anonymous wrote:

What is wrong with a contactless card?  Can you still use your plastic card? I would say nevermind at this point and just ask to reactivate the plastic one. 


That's exactly what the AMEX CSR asked.  I advised her that the question was not a good look!

 

I prefer non-contact less for security reasons.  No, the plastic card was deactivated. I'm actually taking one for the Myfico team.  Several people have posted that AMEX CSR's are saying non-contact less is not possible.  But at least one poster received one.  If this process works, others will know they can request the card they want.


 

What specifically is the security issue?

Message 20 of 62
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.