No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Capital One EO shouldn't complaint of getting direct calls/emails.If their representative do their job, or have any kind of authority,they shouldn't have the problems!
PMs sent.
Courtesy and respect go a long way.
Thank you
@roastbeans wrote:Capital One EO shouldn't complaint of getting direct calls/emails.If their representative do their job, or have any kind of authority,they shouldn't have the problems!
In there lies the issue. You have the EO setting policies that the direct reps really cant do anything other than say "no" to most anything, and try to placate you with some sort of AF reduction. Then when asked directly, the EO ignores the very rules they create, cave, and give out goodies to the speaky wheels that squeel the loudest.
Lousy business model and practice if you ask me.
Can you please send me the EO phone/email too?
@Anonymous wrote:PMs sent.
Courtesy and respect go a long way.
J14K, Will you send em the email/number to the EO? I'd really appreciate it.
Congrats on your CLI
Google "Capital One CEO email" The info you are asking for is in the very first result.
@lajntx wrote:
@roastbeans wrote:Capital One EO shouldn't complaint of getting direct calls/emails.If their representative do their job, or have any kind of authority,they shouldn't have the problems!
In there lies the issue. You have the EO setting policies that the direct reps really cant do anything other than say "no" to most anything, and try to placate you with some sort of AF reduction. Then when asked directly, the EO ignores the very rules they create, cave, and give out goodies to the speaky wheels that squeel the loudest.
Lousy business model and practice if you ask me.
I think it is probably a good model for their markets. You have a large group of call center staff who really cannot make decisions and will stick to the script (which largely consists of forms of "Sorry, that is not possible at this time"). This makes things very uniform.
Most customers accept it, reducing costs. And those that don't, and don't know about the EO, maybe close their accounts, but there are always new people wanting credit cards in this space .
And finally those that do reach the EO can often get what they need and keep the account.
Sucks as an informed consumer, but OK for the business.
I have to agree with lajntx, it is a bad business model.
If they allowed even small increases to accounts they would have to staff the call with less people. This would reduce costs. They wouldn't need such a large EO either, which makes more money than the normal call centers. And basically all they do is take information which could be given online and hand it over to an analyst.
Opening and closing accounts does affect their profit margin. It takes money to open an account, so they need to have customers who stay with them to offset this cost. If the person PIF the only money they make is through the transaction with the discount. If they carry a balance and they pay it off to close the account, they are losing interest rate income. Either way it is a lose-lose situation for them. Even in the worst case scenario and the person simply SDs the card, it costs money to keep it open, especially if they ever mail anything to the customer. (I think anyone who SDs the card should then switch to paper statements!)
When you hear the same script over and over you are probably more inclined to either call more often of talk more to the agents, which raises the costs. Some may simply stop calling and those that do are less likely to use the card unless they cannot get other credit. I would even say that some of them should not get anything. I have seen people on this board who don't deserve anything and in some of those situations they still have gotten nothing.
One thing this board has done is increase the costs they have incurred with all the new attention the EO has gotten. This has been going on for about a year now where it has been more publically known. How have they responded? Well now apparently it is easier to get CLIs online. This does indicate that they do not properly respond to customer issues properly, as it took a year! Did it really need to take a year to respond to this? Did they think it was going to go away? All it really did was make these people have to respond more to people. Some of them did deserve what they had gotten. I deserved what I got from them! It took me multiple contacts with the EO to get it. This meant that they had to field multiple calls from me alone which really didn't need to happen. I can honestly say that I have all the accounts that I do now because of their lack of treating me like a real customer. I would have been happy with CLIs and a longer AAoA. After I started getting better accounts I realized that I could get even nicer ones later. I got them over time, but it all happened sooner that it would have, because of their lack of good service. They would have gotten much more money from me had they responded properly. I would have put a lot more money through their cards, instead of others. Those that have simply abandoned them have not provided them with as much income as they could have. A business model is supposed to get the shareholders the best results, so no their business model is flawed. If I were a stockholder I might be upset.