No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Hi all,
I just converted my regular Chase Visa Freedom card to a Freedom "Signature" card.
I am aware that the limit won't be reported from reading posts here.
My question is - will the TYPE of credit showed on CRA reports be different? For example, instead of "Account type: REVOLVING" will it say something else for account type?
And if so will this serve to help the part of your FICO score mix that is "different types of credit"?
I don't have the signature, I have the Freedom Plus, so I'll allow others to comment on how it will report based upon their real world experience.
However, credit mix really means the following:
1. Revolving (includes CC, store and charge)
2. Installment (fixed payments for fixed term, secured and unsecured such as auto or personal loans)
3. Mortgage (real estate, home, etc.)
It isn't going to help having different flavors of CC's. In fact the only distinguishing factor is "major" cc and "premium" bankcard as opposed to store and subprime.
@Anonymous wrote:I don't have the signature, I have the Freedom Plus, so I'll allow others to comment on how it will report based upon their real world experience.
However, credit mix really means the following:
1. Revolving (includes CC, store and charge)
2. Installment (fixed payments for fixed term, secured and unsecured such as auto or personal loans)
3. Mortgage (real estate, home, etc.)
It isn't going to help having different flavors of CC's. In fact the only distinguishing factor is "major" cc and "premium" bankcard as opposed to store and subprime.
Does anybody know where it is possible to find a clear definition of "major" versus "premium" credit cards? I've seen speculation but nowhere anything definite.
Hi Matt ![]()
In my post, I referred to "major" in reference to Visa, MC, AMEX, Discover. Premium would be based upon issuance from prime lenders/banks/ccc's. Subprime may be "major" but not issued by prime lenders. Those CCC's known to issue to high risk cases tend to be a factor, not so much by FICO, but by LO review and by other proprietary score models such as Vantage and TU, as well as internal models with lenders.
An LO review looking at a low CL First Premiere card would not hold the same clout as one issued by BoA, Chase or other prime lenders.
FICO doesn't seem to really care who issues the "major" card. But I have found that the LO does. And I have noticed that some of the "FAKO" score models seem to bring this up a lot.
Here are examples:
Not enough revolving debt experience. [TransUnion, Experian, Equifax] A healthy balance of credit and loan accounts is key to achieving a high credit score. It is important to build a record of responsible credit use over time with different types of accounts. Consider opening a new account to strengthen your credit report.
There are not enough premium bankcard accounts on your credit report. [TransUnion] A healthy balance of credit and loan accounts is key to achieving a high credit score. It is important to build a record of responsible credit use over time with different types of accounts. Consider opening a new account to strengthen your credit report.
There are too many personal finance accounts on your credit report. [TransUnion, Experian, Equifax] Having too much available credit can sometimes harm your credit score. Lenders may feel that you have the ability to spend more than you could potentially pay back. You might want to consider closing a few accounts or asking to have your credit limits reduced. Avoid closing too many accounts - especially the oldest accounts on your credit report - because it could harm your credit score. Closing the oldest accounts can damage your score by making the length of your credit use appear shorter.
Anyway, this is my interpretation of what I have seen, experienced or gathered.
@Anonymous wrote:Hi Matt
In my post, I referred to "major" in reference to Visa, MC, AMEX, Discover. Premium would be based upon issuance from prime lenders/banks/ccc's. Subprime may be "major" but not issued by prime lenders. Those CCC's known to issue to high risk cases tend to be a factor, not so much by FICO, but by LO review and by other proprietary score models such as Vantage and TU, as well as internal models with lenders.
An LO review looking at a low CL First Premiere card would not hold the same clout as one issued by BoA, Chase or other prime lenders.
FICO doesn't seem to really care who issues the "major" card. But I have found that the LO does. And I have noticed that some of the "FAKO" score models seem to bring this up a lot.
Here are examples:
Not enough revolving debt experience. [TransUnion, Experian, Equifax] A healthy balance of credit and loan accounts is key to achieving a high credit score. It is important to build a record of responsible credit use over time with different types of accounts. Consider opening a new account to strengthen your credit report.
There are not enough premium bankcard accounts on your credit report. [TransUnion] A healthy balance of credit and loan accounts is key to achieving a high credit score. It is important to build a record of responsible credit use over time with different types of accounts. Consider opening a new account to strengthen your credit report.
There are too many personal finance accounts on your credit report. [TransUnion, Experian, Equifax] Having too much available credit can sometimes harm your credit score. Lenders may feel that you have the ability to spend more than you could potentially pay back. You might want to consider closing a few accounts or asking to have your credit limits reduced. Avoid closing too many accounts - especially the oldest accounts on your credit report - because it could harm your credit score. Closing the oldest accounts can damage your score by making the length of your credit use appear shorter.
Anyway, this is my interpretation of what I have seen, experienced or gathered.
Message Edited by txjohn on 05-02-2009 12:23 PM
Ah, thanks for the clarification. I was aware that "Consumer Finance" accounts were flagged as a minor negative (for example, Citibank has a division called CitiFinancial which is considered subprime). I was wondering more whether for example there exist distinctions among the various cards offered by major lenders. For example Citibank, Chase, and Amex offer a bewildering variety of cards, compared to some years ago when it seemed like the main distinction was whether it was called "Gold" or "Platinum," and what Amex called "Gold" was roughly comparable to what everybody else called "Platinum."
Of course at most retailers nowadays the only hands touching the card and the only eyes seeing the card are mine, so long as the machine makes the happy approved "beep" that's all they care about.
PS about cash register beeps: ever seen the Handmaid's Tale? Pretty good movie, actually. Well, the relevant bit here is they filmed most of it on the Duke University campus and I was a grad student there at the time. In a few scenes women are shopping using plastic cards, and they used actual cash registers from Duke campus stores and eateries. What amused us at Duke when we saw the film was how everybody is buying stuff but since the dummy cards they gave the extras were of course nonworking the registers were actually making their "rejected" beep not their "accepted" beep. I suppose the movie people simply figured nobody else would know the particular beeps made by the registers at Duke...
Hmmm... I wonder then if Signature cards report something other than "Revolving" even if FICO doesn't care I wonder if creditors internal scoring systems, or if manual reviewers care?
Reason is that I THINK (could be wrong) Signature cards are only given to people who meet strict guidelines of good financial standing. I don't think they are handing them out like candy like the old "Platinum" cards.... YET anyway. (someone please correct me if I am wrong here)
Twix -
You may be partially correct. But remember, even though there is no "preset" spending limit, there is a limit. And sometimes this limit is dynamic, not just upward. So, you can have a "signature" type card with only $1000 spending allowed. And you may have built a relationship where you can spend $50k. But, just as a standard CL card can be CLD, so can the established limits of the signature.
However, I am not aware of any "subprime" signature cards, so I think your basic premise that they don't "hand them out like candy" is correct. But many prime CL cards are not either. In fact, some people who have AMEX have been turned down by other CCC's for prime CL cards. In fact, some prime lenders don't like signture or no preset cards because of the unknown risk factors and the potential to create high debt with potentially short terms.