No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Anonymous wrote:They don't want to analyze WHY you have your credit, only whether you WILL CONTINUE to have your credit, so they evoke the "past performance is a predictor of future repayment" garbage.
@Anonymous wrote:
I have to slightly disagree about lenders being at risk by disclosing score requirements. The reality is that lenders WANT people to apply for their credit instruments. Ermmm, I think my junk mail pile backs me up hereSo, they would receive greater return on their investment because only those who meet the requirements would apply! By your argument, they want to decrease number of applicants so as to not overwhelm the customer service reps!
We live in a world of numbers; if we didn't, identity theft would be a heck of a lot harder!
I do see what you're saying, and as a consumer, I would love to see this! I can imagine a little box that says,"Typical FICO EX scores for this card are 690 and above. However, other elements on your credit reports can and will affect our decision to offer you this card, including payment history and current balances."(Or something similar.)
But I can promise you, consumers will see that "690 and above", stop reading right there, apply, get denied because of two collections that hit 3 months ago, and go ballistic. I predict this because I see it all the time here! "I read four different threads that people with scores 30 points lower than mine got approved for the Greater World Export Bank Super-Bling World Signature MasterVisa, and whogavemecredit-dot-com scores were 40 points lower, but they denied me!!!"
And I am absolutely not making fun of people who post this. People fixate on the numbers, and a lot of that, of course, is that we all tend to use improving scores as feedback for our efforts in improving our credit histories. As Americans, our nature is to be optimistic and to have faith in our ability to work hard and improve our situation, and it's also our nature to expect things to be straight-forward and to want quick results. So when we see our scores going up, and up some more, then by golly, it's time for creditors to realize that we've changed things around, and the proof is in the scores.
But there's so much more to approvals than that, much of which is a secret on the same level as my grandmother's biscuit recipe, which she took to the grave. I just can't imagine a CCC mid-level manager posting a suggested score range and surviving more than a few days. If nothing else, the company's CSRs would shred him/her to pieces after the first 6 dozen furious calls from denied applicants. And it would happen --I once read an angry post here where a member was turned down for a card and attacked the rest of us for misleading him or her (whichever it was.)
Message Edited by haulingthescoreup on 02-05-2008 05:50 PM