No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@pizza1 wrote:What's better....chip/pin or chip/signature?
Better how, specifically? The word doesn't mean much without qualification.
If the terminal isn't EMV enabled it doesn't really matter. If the terminal is chip & PIN only then better is pretty obvious. From a security standpoint chip & PIN has an edge. From a speed of transaction standpoint mag stripe is faster.
Barclays Arrival+ is also a true Chip and PIN card
@Anonymous wrote:
Depends on your definitions, really the priority of sig vs PIN. Pretty sure if you use Arrival at a store, it will prompt for signature usually. Now, if it is an unattended tollbooth/ticket machine etc, it might instead ask for a PIN.
But "real" chip&pin, default to PIN first, and drop down to other authentication methods if required by the terminal
Well that's really disheartening... I have read people saying they've used it in Europe at unmanned kiosks with no problems though, so that's why I figured it truly was a chip and PIN.
Can you share the link the to post where Barclays says it's chip an signature?
@takeshi74 wrote:
@pizza1 wrote:What's better....chip/pin or chip/signature?
Better how, specifically? The word doesn't mean much without qualification.
If the terminal isn't EMV enabled it doesn't really matter. If the terminal is chip & PIN only then better is pretty obvious. From a security standpoint chip & PIN has an edge. From a speed of transaction standpoint mag stripe is faster.
not if you count the time the 2 paper slips print....customers signs ...merchants verify the signature I am much faster in Europe with chip & pin
IMO I prefer chip and signature, but only in the US. That's mainly because merchants will get the whole PIN thing wrong.