No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I agree. The semantics don't interest me. IMO, this game is about return on investment - cash in our pockets for the efforts we put in.
That's a remarkable achievement to have profited so much from this hobby. Would you mind sharing how many SUBs/offers/etc. you had vs your spending? I follow the 80/20 principle for most things- trying to get 80% of the results for 20% of the effort, but I'm nowhere close to covering 80% of my spend with my efforts. I've maybe netted $10,000 worth of SUBs/cash back this year on 100k in spend (a lot of which is taxes). Our spending patterns may be wildly different and my MS is minimal relative to my spend.
@ptatohed wrote:What do the credit issuers themselves call it?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@ElvisCaprice wrote:
Oh boy, the semantics are of little use to this cat.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@redpat wrote:
Tomato, Tomahto.......
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@Vinjints wrote:
Kleenex. Bandaid. Is a hotdog a sandwich? Then you can talk about subs, hoagies and wedges.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@JoeRockhead wrote:
Bottom line: Use “SUB” however the community uses “SUB,” because language evolves and nobody wants a glossary stricter than Amex’s RAT department.= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@1lifeisworthit wrote:
What fun! No snark intended. I can burrow into linguistic minutiae
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@odd_dog wrote:
Now the genie is out of the bottle (lol)...if a sub is not always a sub then cash back is not always cash back either ...
so I guess we are in semantics with these definitions
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@Patient957 wrote:
People trying to redefine the term SUB are just playing games with semantics.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@mgood wrote:
If someone thinks the definition should be updated, sure, ok. If someone thinks I'm terribly ignorant for using the wrong terminology, ok. I'm not going to get worked up over it one way or the other.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@Realist wrote:
The activity of acquiring something of benefit, in exchange for supplying something of value to acheive their value, is often referred to as the SUB. Right, wrong, or indifferent. This activity has morphed or blended into a blanket term of what we see today.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
@LendLong wrote:
I agree. The semantics don't interest me.
I wanted to answer your question, @ptatohed: "What do the credit card issuers themselves call it?" But I also want to answer the question, "Does the public at-large care what the credit card issuers themselves call it?!"
Changes to language are often driven more by the people who use it daily, not the people who write the dictionary or those who initially coin a word or phrase to express a new object or idea.
Judging by the consensus so-far summarized by those quotes above, the community seems to agree that (1) the term SUB is mainstream for "new cardholder incentives"; (2) this discussion is an argument over semantics that no one really cares about: ie, they don't care what the card issuers themselves care to call their incentives.
But wait, what DO card issuers call their incentives? The reason SUB has become so mainstream is that (1) it is a short and simple way to express the concept of getting something as a incentive for signing up, even if strings are attached to that incentive; (2) Card Issuers themselves do not have one universal standard for what they call their incentives, if they name them anything at all! That leaves an opening for cardholders to assign a name, and that name has become SUB.
American Express:
Chase:
CITI:
Wells Fargo:
US Bank:
Navy FCU:
PenFed:
Discover:
Capital One:
PNC Bank:
Affinity Credit Union:
USAA:
This is just a summary of some of the largest US lenders. So do I see any of them specifically use the term "Sign Up Bonus" or "SUB?" No. Do I see the word "Bonus?" Yes, and often. On the other hand, do I see any consistency between them on what they want to call new cardmember incentives? Absolutely not! Part of the reason is that the incentives take many forms such as how they are awarded (cash or points or miles) as well as if other actions are required, such as spending $x within x days; spending $x within a travel portal (like with Capital One), waiving an annual fee, transferring a balance, or an undefined bonus such as Discover's "CashBack Match Bonus." Likewise, communicating a lender's choice of terms could become arduous on the forums and inhibit communication, especially when a lender uses more than one term or format! It just doesn't matter. Consequently, SUB has come a concise way to express any of the below terms and whatever others that lenders choose to use! ![]()























@Stuart89 wrote:If we’re being literal, almost all offers are “initial bonuses” rather than sign-up bonuses. The Amazon cards are just about the only major SUBs still available. Other issuers don’t even like the terminology.
No, @Stuart89, almost all incentives are not "initial bonuses." As a matter of fact, the card issuers choose a wide variety of non-standard terminology! See my posting above. So "SUB" or "Sign Up Bonus" serves as clear, concise, and unifying phrase to communicate a new card or deposit account incentive.























@redpat wrote:
Congrats to the two of you, between Aim's length of posts and Ptatohed's sig this thread has made it to three pages long.
Me?
Length of posts?
I've never heard that one before. ![]()
smirk_emoji.png
In my defense, the topic required some content from outside the forums. ![]()






















