No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
If you want to save money, go for it. If you need a higher score right. Be careful. I know they freak out with high ut on one card. I did it but with no interest, I didn't care. You'll pay it down quicker.
You'll save money by doing the transfer. Unless you're applying for a mortgage or new car before you can get that util under control, you should go for the BT.
I agree with everyone else. Go for it then recover your scores.
In my wallet: Quicksilver 5000; Venture 15,000; Barclay Apple Rewards 2000; CareCredit 3300; Bank of America Platinum Visa 2000; Bank of America Travel Rewards 3500; Bank of America Travel Rewards 3500; Amazon Store Card 5000; Discover 10,000; Barclay Ring Platinum MasterCard. 12,500. Total Credit: 61,800.
6/27-FICO: EQ - 789; TU - 776; EX - 681; GOAL: 780 across the board then 800 across the board. Chapter 13 seven years May, 2015. Reset my garden date to 6/27. Gardening until further notice.
@Anonymous wrote:
Both of my auto cli with Barclays were 2 months after a large transfer. I say go for it.
I don't have any experience with Barclay's but IMHO when I get a card - regardless of the bank - I do so with the expectation that I will be able to put it to work. When I've had 0% promos (I have two right now with different banks) I always shift everything I can to those cards to take advantage of those promos, which allows me to pay down the balances quicker, which in turn saves money. Some folks worry about their 'status' with their accounts to the point of not using certain cards at certain merchants, etc.; that is not me. My cards are tools, to assist me in my day-to-day endeavors and in meeting my long-term goals... I don't make a habit of changing my behavior for them.
That being said, I've never pushed a card to 95% utilization the first few months (or generally any month) since that's undisputedly begging for somebody to take a closer look, and nobody wants adverse action. The OP is considering using approx. 75% of the credit line, which is a bit over the "goal" many people speak of as 30% but it's certainly not "maxed" either. I'm with fordguy89, if I knew I would be able to immediately make sizable payments, I personally wouldn't hesitate. On the other hand, if you are only able to make minimum payments, or slightly higher than minimum, I would consider (again, if it were me) limiting my BTs to around 50% of the credit line, give or take. I believe the key here is since the account is new, I would want to clearly demonstrate to the bank's computers that I was not in financial duress, and that I was actually able to handle a larger limit than they had originally established.
Just my 2¢.
I've done BTs with Barclays in the past. I entered my cc account number and amount I wanted paid on the Barclays site (within the BT screen), and a few days later, Barclays electronically paid the cc company. My first round of BTs used up 42% of my utilization. My add on BT, which was within 45 days of opening the Barclays card, took my utilization up to 82%. I made sure to pay about 8x the minimum, each month, and my total revolving account utilization was <10%.