No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
sidewinder wrote:I Dv'd a CA who is reporting 2 accounts from a past business venture. By the time these debts had occured, I had already signed off on everything on the business and turned it over to someone else.I may have gotten something on one of the debts and believe I called and said that I wasn't responsible for it. This was back in like 03 or 04. But I believe the debt I called about is one that is not showing on my CR but is showing on my past business partner's report. And in the letter the clearly state that they communicated with my business partner, not I.The letter says :This is in reponse to your letter dated XXXX in which you are disputing two accounts showing up on your credit bureau file. Both of these accoutns were paid in full with the last payment being received in September 2006. Please check to see if your credit file is showing Paid Collection with a zero balance and if so we are reporting correctly.The validation you are requesting is done within the first 30 days after the initial communication. This account was not disputed and our communication was with your business partner and co-signer, XXXXXX. Both accounts were paid in full almost two years ago.Sincerely,blah blah blahCouldn't I reply with a letter stating............The initial contact was when you received my letter in February, so I am within the 30 day validation window, seeing as you state in your own letter that you communicated with XXXXXX and not myself?
HappyDays wrote:never give any info to any CA....they will use it against you.Start you letter with this amke all changes where needed. make sure you put in there that you want proof that you paid! This tells them that it has already been decided in court that they must answer.Dear Sir/Madam:I'm sure you know, under FDCPA Section 809 (b), you are not allowed to pursue collection activity until the debt is validated. You should be made aware that in TWYLA BOATLEY, Plaintiff, vs. DIEM CORPORATION, No. CIV 03-0762 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, 2004, the courts ruled that reporting a collection account indeed is considered collection activity.You recieved a request for validation from me on 9/18/07. You have not responded to that request in any way, and since that time you have updated information on my Experian credit report on 10/10/07 and on my Equifax report TWICE on 10/15/07. Each of these updates constitutes a violation of FDCPA.While I prefer not to litigate, I will use the courts as needed to enforce my rights under the FDCPA.I look forward to an uneventful resolution of this matter.I request that all contact with me be in writing, and only when you can provide adequate validation of this alleged debt. To refresh your memory on what constitutes legal validation, I am giving a list of the required documentation:
Message Edited by HappyDays on 03-19-2008 03:20 PM
Message Edited by HappyDays on 03-19-2008 03:22 PM
Message Edited by HappyDays on 03-19-2008 03:22 PM
Message Edited by HappyDays on 03-19-2008 03:24 PM
gatoravi8tor1 wrote:Sidewinder,No matter what they say, they are still required to validate the debt!! How much the amount ?? Is it past SOL??
Take them to small claims court!! Take as much documentation as possible. Here in FL it costs between $45-$60. If already paid they won't show. Judge will rule in your favor. Send copy of ruling to CRA's They will have to delete or they are in violation, and you can sue them!! I have won 3 cases in the past year by doing this.