No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Well, if we have opposing data points here it simply means that Chase and possibly other lenders simply aren't consistent with respect to their high balance reporting.
@Anonymous wrote:Well, if we have opposing data points here it simply means that Chase and possibly other lenders simply aren't consistent with respect to their high balance reporting.
Or that it changed, would be more than strange to have inconsistency in their reporting system; it doesn't really matter, modern FICO high balance is pretty meaningless and personally I still think it's a good thing that lenders like seeing.
I could potentially test Capital One this month, but only if my natural spending causes that to happen. I definitely plan on paying to zero before the statement cuts, so that there'd be absolutely no confusion if the new mid-cycle number appears on my report.
@Revelate wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:Well, if we have opposing data points here it simply means that Chase and possibly other lenders simply aren't consistent with respect to their high balance reporting.
Or that it changed, would be more than strange to have inconsistency in their reporting system; it doesn't really matter, modern FICO high balance is pretty meaningless and personally I still think it's a good thing that lenders like seeing.
Or, perhaps it's product-specific. Maybe co-branded vs straight up cards, or some other factor plays a role in the reporting.
Only if the new mid cycle balance beats out your prior highest mid cycle balances, I think you know that but wasn't sure.
@HeavenOhio wrote:I could potentially test Capital One this month, but only if my natural spending causes that to happen.
I definitely plan on paying to zero before the statement cuts, so that there'd be absolutely no confusion if the new mid-cycle number appears on my report.
@Anonymous wrote:
@Revelate wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:Well, if we have opposing data points here it simply means that Chase and possibly other lenders simply aren't consistent with respect to their high balance reporting.
Or that it changed, would be more than strange to have inconsistency in their reporting system; it doesn't really matter, modern FICO high balance is pretty meaningless and personally I still think it's a good thing that lenders like seeing.
Or, perhaps it's product-specific. Maybe co-branded vs straight up cards, or some other factor plays a role in the reporting.
Given the way servicing departments work, it's pretty unlikely that they'd have seperate servicing applications for cobrand vs. in house cards.
Most likely explanation? Someone is mistaken, second most likely, it changed.
I pulled my reports from annualcreditreport.com yesterday. From those reports, I can tell that: