No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
So I have several credit cards and very low utilization on all of them, but I have about 6-7 that show a balance each month. For maximum scoring, how many credit cards should I have showing balances? Does this have a big impact on score? Thanks!
One, between 1% and 9% of the CL on the card.
CapTool is right.
You can answer your question (does it have a big impact?) experimentally -- and for the rest of us on the Forum. Folks here are always interested in a well run experiment on this question.
Would you be willing to do the following?
Make sure at all of your credit cards are reporting a positive balance, at least $6 but less than 9% of each card's CL. Also make sure your total utilization is at < 1%.
Keep both of those two things stable for at least 40 days (at least $6 and less than 1% total U). Make sure you don't do anything that would be considered a confounding factor. No new inquiries, no old inquiries that cross over the 1 year mark, no new accounts, no recent accounts that have a 1 year birthday. Nothing obvious that could change your score.
Pull all three of your FICO 8 scores.
Then quickly move all your cards to a $0 balance (except one). Wait 30 days.
Pull your three FICO 8 scores again.
And if you want to really hit a home run, zero out the remaining score, wait 30 days, and pull your FICO scores a last time.
That would give us all some really good information as to the scoring impact of the number of credit cards reporting a positive balance (all zero, exactly one positive, all positive).
CGiD: I'm going to do just that when my accounts are PIF. That's epic
@Anonymous wrote:One, between 1% and 9% of the CL on the card.
Well, I kow from the BK forum on rebuilding credit that to maximize your score have 3 CCs and let only 1 report a balance 9% or under, but I assumed that if you have 6 CCs you can let 2 report <9%. and with 9 CCs you can let 3 report. Seems silly and counter productive to have the credit worthiness to be approved for multiple credit accounts and not use them. And in my situation I have a couple early rebuilding CCs that I've outgrown with CCs with better rewards and CLs but I don't want closed so they don't adversely affect my available credit & untilization so I use them a couple times per month to keep them active so they won't CLD or other adverse action. I have 9 CCs/store cards and if FICO is going to ding my score if I let more than 1 report a balance that seems like a serious flaw in the scoring model. A CC shouldn't be like a trophy that you look at and admire but don't dare use it out of fear that will ding your credit score.
@DaveInAZ wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:One, between 1% and 9% of the CL on the card.
Well, I kow from the BK forum on rebuilding credit that to maximize your score have 3 CCs and let only 1 report a balance 9% or under, but I assumed that if you have 6 CCs you can let 2 report <9%. and with 9 CCs you can let 3 report. Seems silly and counter productive to have the credit worthiness to be approved for multiple credit accounts and not use them. And in my situation I have a couple early rebuilding CCs that I've outgrown with CCs with better rewards and CLs but I don't want closed so they don't adversely affect my available credit & untilization so I use them a couple times per month to keep them active so they won't CLD or other adverse action. I have 9 CCs/store cards and if FICO is going to ding my score if I let more than 1 report a balance that seems like a serious flaw in the scoring model. A CC shouldn't be like a trophy that you look at and admire but don't dare use it out of fear that will ding your credit score.
Hi Dave. You are right. There are serious flaws, especially in how credit cards are assessed. The worst offender is "utilization" wherein people are rewarded for hyper low percents. We are so used to gaming the score in this respect here on the myFICO forums that we forget how intensely artificial it is: tweaking your balances and/or credit limits so that you are definitely reporting a positive balance somewhere but that it is less than 1% of what you could charge.
But this is not FICO's fault (or its chief competitor Vantage). Until recently the CRA's simply didn't supply them with the information that they really wanted about credit cards. The issue is easiest to see in a thought experiment. Suppose you have two guys, Bob and Dave. Both have two cards with credit limits of 5k. Bob typically charges between 2k and 4k on each of his cards but he always pays in full each month.. Dave, on the other hand, has been steadily adding to his card debt and only paying the minmum. Last month, both guys reported 8k of CC debt. It's obvious that Bob is far less of a risk than Dave, but until fairly recently the big three CRAs only were able to tell FICO the bare fact of their current debt. There was no way for FICO to get at the much more revealing fact of whether the guy was somebody who always paid it off or whether his spending was gradually getting out of control. (People who can't PIF are almost always people with no reserve of cash and who are living paycheck to paycheck, and therefore at a vastly higher risk of default.)
Because FICO and Vantage couldn't see the crucial thing they wanted (does this guy PIF or does he often carry a balance?), they were forced to rely on the only thing they could see (the current reported balance and its ration to credit limit). Which led to artificial silliness: clever people securing absurdly high credit limits (vastly higher than they really needed) or paying their cards down just before they reported.
But moving forward, the CRAs are now collecting this information. FICO now can typically see not only what your current balance is on your Chase Freedom, but also exactly what your balance was five months ago and of that how much you paid. FICO is not using it yet, as part of the standard score, not even in FICO 9 as far as the news reports go. But it's only a matter of time before they do, e.g. possibly in FICO 10. At that point we will start seeing, I hope, much less emphasis in the models on hyper low utilizations and "zeroing" out all your cards but one, and a richer look at the payment patterns of people over time, notably whether they pay in full or carry a balance.
In the meantime, we have a practical question of what do we do now as consumers -- how do we act to protect our score given the current models? The good news, Dave, is that we don't have to treat our CCs like trophies we can never use. The only time we have to engage in the silliness related to 1% utilizations and lots of zeroes is right before a really important credit pull, like a mortgage or a car. FICO at the moment has no memory for CC balances so typically all anyone has to do is pay on time and use their cards naturally. Polishing up your trophies is only something we have to do in really rare stituations.
Wow, really good & detailed response CreditGuyinDixie, much appreciated. And this part is really relevant for how I look at my credit utilization and credit score:
The only time we have to engage in the silliness related to 1% utilizations and lots of zeroes is right before a really important credit pull, like a mortgage or a car. FICO at the moment has no memory for CC balances so typically all anyone has to do is pay on time and use their cards naturally. Polishing up your trophies is only something we have to do in really rare stituations.
My top 2 reward cards, Cap 1 Quicksilver Sig Visa & Barclays Rewards MC, get the most usage and I usually let the monthly usage post & report and PIF before the due date. But last Jan I was shopping for another car, so to boost my score I PIF'd before the statement date, letting only 1 card report <9%. I got my FICO up to 700, and got my CU's best rate for a late model used car - 1.99% for 5 years for a 2013 used car from Hertz..That done, I felt free to utilize my credit to maximize financial benefit instead maximizing scores. I had 26 months left on a Prosper loan @11%. I got a Barclays NFL card with 15 mos 0% BT and paid off Prosper, savings hundreds in interest expense. When the 55% utilization on that card reported my score dropped almost 20 points - not pleasant to look at & ticks me off, but if I'm not planning to app for anything who cares? So that card is goiong to be reporting a balance for another year or so, and I got a Discover card in July with 0% for the first year, so that card is going to report a blance for the next year. And I've always like "free money", so I prefer to let a top usage cards report a blance and PIF by the due date. Next year when I have NFL & Discover paid off I'll go back to playing the "don't let more than 1 card report a balance & less then 9%" game when I'm ready to app for something new.
Sounds like a sound line of thinking, Dave. Good luck!
PS. I just saw that in your first post you wrote:
And in my situation I have a couple early rebuilding CCs that I've outgrown with CCs with better rewards and CLs but I don't want closed so they don't adversely affect my available credit & untilization so I use them a couple times per month to keep them active so they won't CLD or other adverse action....
That's perfectly sound too. The only reason to close them would be if you have to pay an annual fee or if there are other charges to use them. In that case I would definitely plan on closing them at some point. Otherwise, sure keep them open if you like.
@DaveInAZ wrote:I have 9 CCs/store cards and if FICO is going to ding my score if I let more than 1 report a balance that seems like a serious flaw in the scoring model.
The flaw is that many seem to assume that they need to be optimal at all times. That's not necessarily the case. Any model will have an ideal and everyone will not fit the ideal.
I have 12 cards. Most report balances. My FICO 8's are right around 800. Could they be higher with fewer balances reporting? Sure but it really doesn't matter to me. People should test to see the impact to their specific credit profiles.
@DaveInAZ wrote:A CC shouldn't be like a trophy that you look at and admire but don't dare use it out of fear that will ding your credit score.
Reporting and usage are two different things. If one really wants to micromanage reported utilization while using cards then one can certainly do so. Again, IMO the issue is the assumption that one always needs to be at optimal revolving utilization. That's why many of use advise "for optimal utilization (i.e. to eke out every possible point when applying)...".