No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@HeavenOhio wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:Okay awesome, is there any timeframe that has to be used by? I use the card for like $6/month for our amazon so it will take a while for it to be used.
Can I just use a different card to add balance to in the meantime to avoid the AZEO penalty?
I am currently trying to secure a mortgage.@Anonymous, if your Capital One card has a negative balance two months in a row, they may opt to mail you a check to zero you out. If that possibility is inconvenient for you, I'd probably use the card for charges to cover the negative balance.
A check isn't an issue, just as long as they don't close the card. I read in one of the post when looking up before I posted another card issuer did that so I just didn't want that to happen!
@K-in-Boston wrote:Negative balances will be reported as $0. It will only "hurt" if you have no revolving credit cards reporting a positive balance on your credit reports, but utilization is temporary and as soon as any account reports a positive balance any points lost would be regained.
That is true on fico 08, and fico 09, but with 10T on the horizon, treating utilization as a point in time metric might not be advisable. Point being, on 10T, the fact that all points lost due to utilization will be recovered may not be the case. It might be a good time to start keeping utilization in ideal condition at all times. That way when using historical data, there will not be any bad utilization history to drop those scores. The days we can say points will all be returned if lost because of utilization may be at an end. 10T might be a game changer for how we treat utilization.
@sarge12 wrote:
@K-in-Boston wrote:Negative balances will be reported as $0. It will only "hurt" if you have no revolving credit cards reporting a positive balance on your credit reports, but utilization is temporary and as soon as any account reports a positive balance any points lost would be regained.
That is true on fico 08, and fico 09, but with 10T on the horizon, treating utilization as a point in time metric might not be advisable. Point being, on 10T, the fact that all points lost due to utilization will be recovered may not be the case. It might be a good time to start keeping utilization in ideal condition at all times. That way when using historical data, there will not be any bad utilization history to drop those scores. The days we can say points will all be returned if lost because of utilization may be at an end. 10T might be a game changer for how we treat utilization.
You have a point, but realistically, 10T may take a while before it is widely adopted, if ever. I mean 95% or so of lenders are STILL using 08, which is over a decade old at this point. 09 came out since then and it also hasn't been widely adopted yet.
@OmarGB9 wrote:
@sarge12 wrote:
@K-in-Boston wrote:Negative balances will be reported as $0. It will only "hurt" if you have no revolving credit cards reporting a positive balance on your credit reports, but utilization is temporary and as soon as any account reports a positive balance any points lost would be regained.
That is true on fico 08, and fico 09, but with 10T on the horizon, treating utilization as a point in time metric might not be advisable. Point being, on 10T, the fact that all points lost due to utilization will be recovered may not be the case. It might be a good time to start keeping utilization in ideal condition at all times. That way when using historical data, there will not be any bad utilization history to drop those scores. The days we can say points will all be returned if lost because of utilization may be at an end. 10T might be a game changer for how we treat utilization.
You have a point, but realistically, 10T may take a while before it is widely adopted, if ever. I mean 95% or so of lenders are STILL using 08, which is over a decade old at this point. 09 came out since then and it also hasn't been widely adopted yet.
That may be true, but if it takes 2 years, and they use trended data for 2 years, what we are doing now will be included. Now is the time to consider trended data, so you do not have to suffer a drop in 2 years if 10T is used. From some things I have read, many lenders have been pushing for trended data for years, so the adoption of the 10T might be quicker than we might think by a lot of lenders.
@OmarGB9 wrote:
@sarge12 wrote:
@K-in-Boston wrote:Negative balances will be reported as $0. It will only "hurt" if you have no revolving credit cards reporting a positive balance on your credit reports, but utilization is temporary and as soon as any account reports a positive balance any points lost would be regained.
That is true on fico 08, and fico 09, but with 10T on the horizon, treating utilization as a point in time metric might not be advisable. Point being, on 10T, the fact that all points lost due to utilization will be recovered may not be the case. It might be a good time to start keeping utilization in ideal condition at all times. That way when using historical data, there will not be any bad utilization history to drop those scores. The days we can say points will all be returned if lost because of utilization may be at an end. 10T might be a game changer for how we treat utilization.
You have a point, but realistically, 10T may take a while before it is widely adopted, if ever. I mean 95% or so of lenders are STILL using 08, which is over a decade old at this point. 09 came out since then and it also hasn't been widely adopted yet.
But fico09 is not drastically different than fico08. Fico 10T might be a different story, as it includes trended data, which was added at the request of many lenders. Lenders know some people only get their utilization in check before applying. Lenders also want to be able to see if a borrowers total debt is increasing every month for long periods of time. I really do not think lenders will wait long to switch to this one. It just has too much in it that they have wanted in the scores for years. Ignore the fico 10T now at your peril, but I will assume that todays data will be included in 10T in 2 years, and credit decisions will be made based on the 10T score. If I am wrong, it will not harm my scores, but if I am right, it might prevent any major drop in scores.
@sarge12 wrote:
@OmarGB9 wrote:
@sarge12 wrote:
@K-in-Boston wrote:Negative balances will be reported as $0. It will only "hurt" if you have no revolving credit cards reporting a positive balance on your credit reports, but utilization is temporary and as soon as any account reports a positive balance any points lost would be regained.
That is true on fico 08, and fico 09, but with 10T on the horizon, treating utilization as a point in time metric might not be advisable. Point being, on 10T, the fact that all points lost due to utilization will be recovered may not be the case. It might be a good time to start keeping utilization in ideal condition at all times. That way when using historical data, there will not be any bad utilization history to drop those scores. The days we can say points will all be returned if lost because of utilization may be at an end. 10T might be a game changer for how we treat utilization.
You have a point, but realistically, 10T may take a while before it is widely adopted, if ever. I mean 95% or so of lenders are STILL using 08, which is over a decade old at this point. 09 came out since then and it also hasn't been widely adopted yet.
That may be true, but if it takes 2 years, and they use trended data for 2 years, what we are doing now will be included. Now is the time to consider trended data, so you do not have to suffer a drop in 2 years if 10T is used. From some things I have read, many lenders have been pushing for trended data for years, so the adoption of the 10T might be quicker than we might think by a lot of lenders.
It could, or it could take 10 years before it's adopted, or it may get bypassed altogether and FICO 11 may get adopted instead. We don't really know, so we can't say what we should or shouldn't do, but I do agree that in general it's best to try to keep balances low, not just for possible future iterations of FICO, but also just to avoid getting on any of your creditors' radar for possible AA.
In any case, we're derailing the thread a bit, so let's get back on topic. The topic of 10T or other new versions can have its own thread.