No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I have an open collection account that started showing up in my credit reports since last year. Prior to that, my credit score has always been excellent, no lower than 800. The collection account was from a Florida timeshare that I stopped paying till it was in default and eventually was foreclosed. The account was then passed on to a collection agency.
Since the timeshare was already foreclosed, is it a wise idea to pay the collection agency? I do not expect to take up any loans at all anymore that would need a credit check. In the meantime, the amount of the open account keeps going up.
While paying a collection does not result in an immediate score increase, in the broader sense, paying will provide future score improvement compared to a collection that remains unpaid.
Thus, paying has clear scoring impact.
More specifically, as a collection (or, for that matter, a delinquent OC account) remains unpaid, the period since initial delinquency continues to increase. Once the debt collector makes any updated reporting, that increased period of delinquency becomes of record and known to FICO, and thus continues to have increasing negative scoring impact.
If a collection is paid, that requires prompt reporting of closure of the collection, with update of status to paid or settled, $0 balance. That terminates any continued update of delinquency by reporting of an increased period since initial delinquency, permitting the collection to begin to age in time since terminated delinquency.
Additionally, regardless of any credit scoring impact, when you apply for new credit and the prospective creditor sees or becomes aware of an unpaid, delinquent debt, that can itself be a reason for denial of new credit, regardless of your three-digit FICO score.
@RobertEG wrote:While paying a collection does not result in an immediate score increase, in the broader sense, paying will provide future score improvement compared to a collection that remains unpaid.
Thus, paying has clear scoring impact.
More specifically, as a collection (or, for that matter, a delinquent OC account) remains unpaid, the period since initial delinquency continues to increase. Once the debt collector makes any updated reporting, that increased period of delinquency becomes of record and known to FICO, and thus continues to have increasing negative scoring impact.
If a collection is paid, that requires prompt reporting of closure of the collection, with update of status to paid or settled, $0 balance. That terminates any continued update of delinquency by reporting of an increased period since initial delinquency, permitting the collection to begin to age in time since terminated delinquency.
Additionally, regardless of any credit scoring impact, when you apply for new credit and the prospective creditor sees or becomes aware of an unpaid, delinquent debt, that can itself be a reason for denial of new credit, regardless of your three-digit FICO score.
@RobertEG Let me see if I'm understanding you correctly. What you're saying is, if it happens to be a collection that is updating, then it will eventually help because it's no longer regularly updating and can therefore age so it's no longer considered recent?
But if it's not updating regularly then there's no benefit whatsoever scorewise correct?
so if it's updating regularly and not going to fall off anytime soon, it would behoove someone to settle it somehow?
Exactly
Thank you for all the info. I might decide to pay it off.
While Robert clarified paying from scoring impact point of view, there is that beautiful notion of paying back what you took and what you owe.
I cringe at "Why pay.."
For the same reason you cannot walk out of the store with thousands of dollars in goods without paying. That's why.
Perpetuating this notion that there is no benefit in paying unless it gets deleted misses one really important part, most people who adopt that attitude have multiple unpaid collections because personal responsibility is never in play
It's always someone else's fault, error etc
So before telling people there is no benefit in paying, consider if you'd advise someone that paying in the store makes no sense if you're not planning on getting caught stealing