No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Anonymous wrote:Has anyone here ever checked their Transrisk score via a Juniper/Barclay CC? I ask because it seems to be way the hell off well you take into account your TU PFICO score through Wamu, EX, & EQ. I dont mind putting my scores out there because I want to see if this has happened to anyone else.EQ FICO: 695TU PFICO: 690EX FICO: 708TRANSRISK: 569.....Funny thing is it was a 597 from 3 months ago yet I paid off more debt, had something removed from CR, yet it dropped. Im glad its considered a FAKO score because I would be highly pissed, excuse me for that but do you feel my point. If anyone has anything close to this situation, I would like to know
Hi DGT12878,
I also have the Juniper/Barclay CC and my Transrisk score says I have a 542 credit score. When I look at my FICO score from my Providian/WaMu card, I show a 721 score. This shocked me so much when I first saw this! I just didn't think my credit score could go down that much within a few months or be that different between two different CC's. I read the reply above about the range for the Transrisk score being from 100-900 and FICO score being 300-850, so that made me feel a little better. I still think there should be just ONE standard way to JUDGE people's credit score.
Anyway, just thought I'd let you know this happened to me too! ![]()
















Starting Score: 469Byrdman, these posts are "resurrected" because they can be. If it is a policy of this forum not to re-open posts that are several months or a year old, then these should be locked by the mods. This will eliminate this problem. If they are not locked, it is unreasonable to expect this not to happen.
















Starting Score: 469Hello Boscoe... Please keep in mind that the mods here generously volunteer their time so that we can all enjoy the best experience possible. So, let's keep things friendly, supportive, and respectful, OK? Your cooperation would be appreciated!
Boscoe wrote:
Byrdman, these posts are "resurrected" because they can be. If it is a policy of this forum not to re-open posts that are several months or a year old, then these should be locked by the mods. This will eliminate this problem. If they are not locked, it is unreasonable to expect this not to happen.