cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Three more questions

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Three more questions

First of all I'd like to say thanks to all who have helped with great advice so far.

I have three more questions:

Is there any way to stop CA's from selling your account over and over? I've heard (it may or may not be true) that every time a collection agency sells your account it starts the 7 year period over again.

Second, is there any way to have a legit hard inquiry removed from your credit report? My reason for asking this is because I tried to help my mother out in buying the house she was renting and I was was not approved.

Third, has anyone had any success in dealing with First National Collection Bureau? I am going to send them a PFD letter and I'm just curious as to my chances. Smiley Happy

Thanks again.

Message Edited by Thresh on 04-17-2008 08:15 PM

Message Edited by Thresh on 04-17-2008 08:16 PM
Message 1 of 13
12 REPLIES 12
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions



Thresh wrote:
First of all I'd like to say thanks to all who have helped with great advice so far.

I have three more questions:

Is there any way to stop CA's from selling your account over and over? I've heard (it may or may not be true) that every time a collection agency sells your account it starts the 7 year period over again.
 
The 7 year period is set by the DOFD, which is set by the OC. This date can NOT be changed once the account has been sent to collections/charged off. It only gets changed before reaching collection/charge off status IF you become current. As for keeping them from selling it......not really unless you pay it. If you request validation and they dont' respond or fail to fully validate, they can't resell-- they will send back to the OC and the OC will resell.

Second, is there any way to have a legit hard inquiry removed from your credit report? My reason for asking this is because I tried to help my mother out in buying the house she was renting and I was was not approved.
 
Nope, but after 1 year it doesn't hurt and after 2 it is removed. Now if you have a strong relationship with the creditor they may recode as a soft, but I doubt it.

Third, has anyone had any success in dealing with First National Collection Bureau? I am going to send them a PFD letter and I'm just curious as to my chances. Smiley Happy
 
Sorry, can't help you there. You might search for them on these boards by typing their name into the seach box at the top of the page. It is right by where your username is displayed.

Thanks again.

Message Edited by Thresh on 04-17-2008 08:15 PM

Message Edited by Thresh on 04-17-2008 08:16 PM


Message 2 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions

Thank you very very much. The people on this forum are AMAZING!
Message 3 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions

Hi, Thresh.  I'm sure some of our knowledgeable members will be along shortly to answer your first and third questions.  Just a friendly reminder regarding the second question, however, that discussions regarding the removal of legitimate inquiries are in violation of the FICO Forums Credit Repair Discussion Guidelines, and any post offering you advice in that area would be removed.
 
Thanks for posting, and as I said, I'm sure someone will be able to help you with your other questions.
 
Edit: And in the time it took me to write this post, I see sidewinder has beat me to it.  Thanks, sidewinder!
 


Message Edited by cheddar on 04-17-2008 08:26 PM
Message 4 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions

Ok thanks for the input. Sorry to have been in violation.
Message 5 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions



Thresh wrote:
Ok thanks for the input. Sorry to have been in violation.

No, no.  Please don't misunderstand.  I know that you were asking an innocent question.  I was just giving you the heads up that you won't get any answers to that question because the answers would be in violation.

 
Message 6 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions

Did I mention that you guys are great? Smiley Happy

Oh yeah, rather than starting a new topic, hopefully someone will be able to help me with another question that has come up while browsing these forums till my eyes bleed.

Can I still use a PFD letter to a collection agency even though I contacted them and agreed to pay within a few days? I did this before finding these forums and perhaps I can also include a letter stating that since I spoke with them I did more research and now believe that I made an error in agreeing to pay them without having researched the accounts in question.

Thanks as always.
Message 7 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions

You sure can try-
 
In the future - Do not talk to CA's on the phone-
You just admitted the debt is yours, made a promise to pay (may reset SOL) and if you don't pay they can easily get a judgment-
 
Communicate in writting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thresh wrote:
Did I mention that you guys are great? Smiley Happy

Oh yeah, rather than starting a new topic, hopefully someone will be able to help me with another question that has come up while browsing these forums till my eyes bleed.

Can I still use a PFD letter to a collection agency even though I contacted them and agreed to pay within a few days? I did this before finding these forums and perhaps I can also include a letter stating that since I spoke with them I did more research and now believe that I made an error in agreeing to pay them without having researched the accounts in question.

Thanks as always.


Message 8 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions

Ouch. I guess there's nothing wrong with giving it a try at least. Wish I HAD known this information before talking to them.
Message 9 of 13
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Three more questions

After reading this passage I'm sincerely hoping that I'm understanding it correctly and that it means that telephone conversations are not binding:

THE FOLLOWING STATUTE PROHIBITS "RE-AGING" OF SOL WITHOUT A WRITTEN CONTRACT

§ 16.065. Acknowledgment of Claim An acknowledgment of the justness of a claim that appears to be barred by limitations is not admissible in evidence to defeat the law of limitations if made after the time that the claim is due unless the acknowledgment is in writing and is signed by the party to be charged.

I live in Texas and this is a Texas statute.
Message 10 of 13
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.