No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I've recently discovered that I have a Verizon Wireless account listed on my credit report (all 3) as past due and in collections. I have never been a Verizon customer, nor do I owe them a debt. I need advice on what steps I should take next. Here's what I've done so far:
Given the above information, I ask the community for help. What is my next step in getting this deliquent Verizon account off my report? I can't exactly prove that I have never been a Verizon customer (can I?). Verizon won't help, and the alleged collection agent can't help. The CBs have all supposedly validated the record. What's next?
The first step is to follow the FCRA identity theft procedure to immediately get any and all information related to the matter blocked from your credit report.
There is no need for any input or concurrence by either the creditor or debt collector.
It requires that you file a police report and send it to the CRA along with proof of your identity and an identity theft affidavit.
FCRA 605B.
If you wish to additioanally pursue the theft itself, you can also send a copy of the police report to the OC and get all busniess records in their possession related to the alleged identity theft. FCRA 609(e).
The "identity theft" process is an inference, and not necessarily a factual assertion that your identity has been stolen.
It is a process that permits, based on a sworn statement that you never authorized the account or transaction, the block of that information from your credit report.
It is an inference that if the creditor has some documentation that asserts you are respnsible for the account, it may have resulted from soneone else using your identity.
You are not required to identify a culprit, only assert that you did not authoriize or approve.
The dispute process fails because the creditor can verify if they have some basis, and is not required to conduct a private investigation to prove that docements, for example, were actually submitted by you. That is why the "identity theft" provisions of the FCRA were enacted...... because the dispute process usually does not require removal by the creditor, and involves the input from the furnisher of the disputed information.
The identity theft process under FCRA 605B results in immediate block of the information from a consumer's credit report without any involvement of the creditor or debt collector.
You might wish to reconsider use of the identity theft provisions of the FCRA, which permits immediate block of the information from your scoring.
Understood. I was not aware that this is how the identity theft section of the FCRA works - I assumed that it asserted that my identity HAS been stolen, and involves so much more. One question I do have is this - if I envoke the identity theft method, how does that affect my ability to apply for future credit. Will any creditor running my credit in the future see that I have a block on my credit, and therefore deny my recieving credit?
The FCRA mandates that any information related to the asserted identity theft must be blocked from your credit report.
A third party thus wont be aware of the information, period. They cannot consider that of which they are not aware.
Two other advantages to the identity theft provisions of the FCRA might be of interest.
First, once you have obtained block under FCRA 605B, that also imposes an automatic bar on the party from sale of the debt.
Thus, you can prevent the whole credit reporting cycle from starting anew by another debt collctor.
Second, you can additionally send a copy of the police report to both the creditor and debt collector and require their production of records are related to the asserted identity theft, thus permitting you to "investigate" the facts behind the matter.