cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

incorrect or missing terms duration

tag
sassymomof2
Frequent Contributor

incorrect or missing terms duration

I just realized my timeshare loan does not list a repayment term on equifax; is missing from TU, and has a 10 month repayment term on TRW (experian). The repayment term is 10 years. Should this be a concern?

Starting Fico Feb 2011 EQ 570 TU 580 EX ?
May 2014 EQ 709 EX 684 TU discover 665

Closed on first home April 26, 2012!
Last app August 2, 2014. Gardening indefinitely!!!
Message 1 of 7
6 REPLIES 6
RobertEG
Legendary Contributor

Re: incorrect or missing terms duration

Not in regard to FICO scoring, if it is reporting as an installment loan.  FICO does not even score the payment or nonpayment of debt, let alone the terms of payment on an account.

Those are between you and the creditor. 

However, an issue I wouild be concerned about is that the account is in fact being reported, and thus scored by FICO, as an installment loan.  Preset terms of payment on a specified advance of credit is what generally differentiates an installment loan from a revolving line of credit.  Is the account type listed as installment?

Utilization of installment and revolving credit are scored very differently by FICO, as is their contribution to your mix of types of credit.  I would be concerned with assurance that they account is being treated by FICO as an installment loan.  If that is determined, I dont see a scoring concern.

Message 2 of 7
fused
Moderator Emeritus

Re: incorrect or missing terms duration

 


@RobertEG wrote:

 

 FICO does not even score the payment or nonpayment of debt



Robert, that would only apply to collections and public records.Smiley Happy

Message 3 of 7
MarineVietVet
Moderator Emeritus

Re: incorrect or missing terms duration

From a BK years ago to:
EX - 3/11 pulled by lender- 835, EQ - 2/11-816, TU - 2/11-782

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem".

@RobertEG wrote:

Not in regard to FICO scoring, if it is reporting as an installment loan.  FICO does not even score the payment or nonpayment of debt, let alone the terms of payment on an account.

Those are between you and the creditor. 

However, an issue I wouild be concerned about is that the account is in fact being reported, and thus scored by FICO, as an installment loan.  Preset terms of payment on a specified advance of credit is what generally differentiates an installment loan from a revolving line of credit.  Is the account type listed as installment?

Utilization of installment and revolving credit are scored very differently by FICO, as is their contribution to your mix of types of credit.  I would be concerned with assurance that they account is being treated by FICO as an installment loan.  If that is determined, I dont see a scoring concern.


As I did several days ago I must respectfully disagree with this. FICO most definitely scores non payment of debt. Ask the person who has a recent 30 day late whether that non payment is scored. Payment history is 35% of your total score. I refer you to What's In Your FICO Score for a refresher.

 

 

 

From a BK years ago to:
EX - 3/11 pulled by lender- 835, EQ - 2/11-816, TU - 2/11-782

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem".

 

 

 

 

Message 4 of 7
sassymomof2
Frequent Contributor

Re: incorrect or missing terms duration

It reports as an installment loan. My main concern is that if a LO looks at an account opening date of October 2007 with a repayment term of TEN months and a months reviewed of 30+ months with an outstanding balance still remaining-shouldn't it raise a red flag. (Like why is this not paid off…)

Starting Fico Feb 2011 EQ 570 TU 580 EX ?
May 2014 EQ 709 EX 684 TU discover 665

Closed on first home April 26, 2012!
Last app August 2, 2014. Gardening indefinitely!!!
Message 5 of 7
MarineVietVet
Moderator Emeritus

Re: incorrect or missing terms duration


@sassymomof2 wrote:
It reports as an installment loan. My main concern is that if a LO looks at an account opening date of October 2007 with a repayment term of TEN months and a months reviewed of 30+ months with an outstanding balance still remaining-shouldn't it raise a red flag. (Like why is this not paid off…)


IMO (could be wrong and often am) all the lender wants to see is a string of "Pays/Paying As Agreed" notations.

 

 

 

From a BK years ago to:
EX - 3/11 pulled by lender- 835, EQ - 2/11-816, TU - 2/11-782

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem".

Message 6 of 7
sassymomof2
Frequent Contributor

Re: incorrect or missing terms duration

Thx! I am trying to avoid any unnecessary surprises. Thanks MarineVietvet

Starting Fico Feb 2011 EQ 570 TU 580 EX ?
May 2014 EQ 709 EX 684 TU discover 665

Closed on first home April 26, 2012!
Last app August 2, 2014. Gardening indefinitely!!!
Message 7 of 7
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.