No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
The idea of a single “credit score requirement” for a no-doc loan is a bit misleading, especially now.
Historically (pre-GFC), true no-doc mortgages existed and lenders relied heavily on credit score and reserves. That’s why older guidance mentions scores like 600–660. Those products largely disappeared after tighter regulation and higher default rates.
Today, what people call “no-doc” lending is usually asset-based or alt-doc lending, and approval is not driven by a hard credit score cutoff. Instead, lenders assess:
Security value and LVR (often capped around 60–70%)
Overall credit conduct (not just the score, but payment history)
Reserves or exit strategy
Purpose and structure of the loan
A weaker credit score doesn’t automatically rule a borrower out if there is strong equity and a clear repayment plan. Conversely, a high score alone won’t secure approval without acceptable security and risk buffers.
In short, modern no-doc lending is less about hitting a minimum score and more about risk management through collateral, structure, and exit, which is why requirements vary widely between lenders.
Due to the age of this thread (originally from 2007), it will be locked in order to keep discussions current. The mortgage lending landscape has changed dramatically since 2007, particularly regarding no-doc/alt-doc loans. If you have questions about current lending practices, please feel free to start a new thread on the topic. Thank you!