cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Am i being sued??

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Am i being sued? part2

Could there be a default judgement on you that you are not aware of? Top line mentions default judgement...

Message 11 of 22
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Am i being sued? part2

PRA has no problem suing people, but they don't like being sued. I had a paid collection with them at one time and I found a few loopholes of getting them off my reports through my state (Massachusetts). They wouldn't budge until I filed a statement of claim in the Massachusetts district court. They deleted before the court date. A week later PRA called me and asked me to dismiss the case because they deleted. In which case I did and sent them documentation showing them I dismissed WITHOUT prejudice.

Message 12 of 22
heavyjay
Regular Contributor

Re: Am i being sued? part2


@Anonymous wrote:

Could there be a default judgement on you that you are not aware of? Top line mentions default judgement...


The dates are weird:

 

01/22/2018 8:30 AM DEPT. S17 OSC RE: STATUS OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CRC 3.740 - Minutes 

07/21/2017 8:30 AM DEPT. S17 OSC RE: SERVICE COMPLETION PURSUANT TO CRC3.740 - Minutes


FICO 08:Jan 18, 2017: EX 800 EQ 725 TU 799
FICO 08:Feb 10, 2017: EX 788 EQ 772 TU 791 (post New Year's app spree)
In the garden as of 1/4/2017. Will remain for all of 2017.
Message 13 of 22
grillandwinemaster
Valued Contributor

Re: Am i being sued??

The date of first default is 11/2012. I have this as Cap1 reporting me 30 days late on all 3 bureaus. 

 

It's a little confusing though, because they reported me 30,60 in 9/2012 and 10/2012, "ok" in 11/2012 and 30 days in 12/2012. So the latest SOL would be 11/2012 since I would have to have been late in Nov 2012 in order for Cap1 to report me 30 days in Dec 2012??

 

If they had filed in Nov 2016, they would be within the SOL. Unless there's some kind of "extension" period to file past the SOL, I do believe they're clearly outside of SOL. 

 


Current Scores 3/2016 Equifax 676 Transunion 697 Experian 648 Goal Scores: 720's accross the board. Gardening Goal: 3/2017
Message 14 of 22
grillandwinemaster
Valued Contributor

Re: Am i being sued? part2


@Anonymous wrote:

Could there be a default judgement on you that you are not aware of? Top line mentions default judgement...


Let's hope not. I havent received any alerts from my credit report services. 


Current Scores 3/2016 Equifax 676 Transunion 697 Experian 648 Goal Scores: 720's accross the board. Gardening Goal: 3/2017
Message 15 of 22
grillandwinemaster
Valued Contributor

Re: Am i being sued??


@heavyjay wrote:

Get your ducks in a row now for when you're served. Your CR isn't good enough to prove a debt is time barred. Their attorney will object to  it as hearsay. You need something from the OC to substantiate the DOFD.


Wouldn't the original creditor reporting me late, and subsequently charging off the account be substantiation of the DofFD from the original creditor? 


Current Scores 3/2016 Equifax 676 Transunion 697 Experian 648 Goal Scores: 720's accross the board. Gardening Goal: 3/2017
Message 16 of 22
RobertEG
Legendary Contributor

Re: Am i being sued??

The courts have held in numerous jurisdictions that filing civil action on a debt for which the state SOL is known to have expired is a violation of the FDCPA.

While it is not an explicit provision of the FDCPA, depending upon where you live, it could be a violation based on case law precedent in your jurisdiction.

 

I would consult an attorney for an opinion as to whether their civil action was a violation,and additionally for review of the court documents for opinion as to any other violations, such as lack of proper service of notice.  You have a procedural mess for which you need review by an attorney.....

Message 17 of 22
heavyjay
Regular Contributor

Re: Am i being sued??


@grillandwinemaster wrote:

@heavyjay wrote:

Get your ducks in a row now for when you're served. Your CR isn't good enough to prove a debt is time barred. Their attorney will object to  it as hearsay. You need something from the OC to substantiate the DOFD.


Wouldn't the original creditor reporting me late, and subsequently charging off the account be substantiation of the DofFD from the original creditor? 


The OC's business records can substantiate the DOFD. Your credit report may be correct but it is still hearsay.


FICO 08:Jan 18, 2017: EX 800 EQ 725 TU 799
FICO 08:Feb 10, 2017: EX 788 EQ 772 TU 791 (post New Year's app spree)
In the garden as of 1/4/2017. Will remain for all of 2017.
Message 18 of 22
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Am i being sued??

No Problem! Good luck going forward. I have an open collection from PRA myself. SOL expires in 13 months. Just trying to ride the storm out

Message 19 of 22
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Am i being sued??

New guy on the block here.

 

This would be my suggestion.  And my story.

 

I would suggest talking with a lawyer.  You should be able to find a lawyer that will take your case for free or almost free.  PRA is a junk debt buyer, and probably will balk at being sued back for violations of FCRA.

 

I had a junk debt buyer sue me in State court for $1200.  One day out of the blue, a process server served me with a notice that I was being sued.  I looked and looked, but could not find a local consumer protection lawyer.  Eventually I found one that was based about 2.5 hours away that agreed to represent me.  I paid him a $200 retainer to get started and he took it from there.  Long story short, he filed a countersuit against the CA and they dropped the original case with prejudice.  But my lawyer wasn't done.  He worked out a settlement of the countersuit and the CA ended up paying him $2500 to drop the countersuit.  He also gave me my $200 back.  

 

Now your case might be different, but if it is somewhat similar you might can find a lawyer to handle your case for free or little money.  

Message 20 of 22
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.