No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
You don't need all that and much of what is listed is not required by law. Keep it short and sweet. Something like this is all you need:
"I pulled my credit bureau report, and I discovered that you claim I owe you a debt. Under FDCPA 809, send me validation of this debt."
"You claim I owe you a debt. In accordance with FDCPA, send me validation of this debt."
"I received your letter claiming I owe you a debt. Per the FDCPA, send me validation of this debt."
Send the letter CMRRR.
From a BK years ago to:
EX - 3/11 pulled by lender- 835, EQ - 2/11-816, TU - 2/11-782
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem".
+1
99% of the contents of that letter are not requirements for debt verification under the statute, and you additionally have no right to set a period for their response, unless you are a resident of Texas.
Take the advice offered, and just send a simple, short request for debt verification under FDCPA 809(b).
Pressler et al didn't file a judgment. They filed a suit. There was a court date and the judge ruled in their favor resulting in a judgment. Did you argue your case at the time of the court date? Legally, it might be over.
They don't have to provide anything, unless you just received a dunning letter. You can respond with a DV asking for the name of the OC, the balance, and a copy of the judgment from that day in court. If you didn't show up to court, were you served? Some have been able to get a case tossed on the grounds of improper service. YMMV on where you live.
I'd gather info first and submit a written dispute after. Start with the court copy and/or transcripts showing that it isn't you. For the CA, get info from the OC and even have them write you saying you never defaulted or never did biz with them. Also, without reading what you posted already, send a DV to the CA.
I would send the DV, but not stop there. No period for response, unless you live in Texas. They could sit on it. Also, are you still within the 30-day window?
I would additionally dispute under the FCRA, and put them under a compulsory investigation time period.
I also would not dispute through the CRA. You dont need them meddling in the dispute, and possibly sanitizing your documentation by use of their e-OSCAR process.
I would send the debt collector a direct dispute under FCRA 623(a)(8), thus ensuring that all your documentation gets to them.
Grounds for dispute is the inaccuracy in reporting a collection based on a debt judgment that was not entered against you.
That compels them to investigate, and respond directly to you within the 30-day dispute period without any CRA meddling. They would, at the least, have to conduct a reasonable investigation that verifies the accuracy of the judgment, and state that fact to you.