No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
OK, I am so frustrated with Experian right now Icould spit nails, not really, but I am aggrivated with them.
on Sept 29th I sent DBF's dispute what accounts to dispute and what was wrong and why I was disputed them.
They signed for it on Oct 6th
Dated Oct 8th I get a letter back from them wanting ID verification
I sent that back they got it on Oct 21st
Dated OCt 26th I get a copy of his reports and a letter saying they could not honor his request if he beleives anything is inaccruate to dispute it and state the reason why he is disputing it, I DID THAT in the 1st letter.
11/09/10 I sent another dispute on two accounts that I disputed with the OC and the CA and neither of them had any info to send him and told EX that in the letter I sent.
They got that on 11/16/10
11/16/10 I get a letter back from EX stating that they placed a FA on his reports, DO WHAT?
11/20/10 I sent an email to an old contact there about them not disputing the accounts requested and ask that they be removed because of it and explained I sent all the info they requested yet still my dispute hasn't been done.
Today I get a email back asking again for ID veriification to be mailed and for me to submit my dispute AGAIN!
So that is 2 disputes that they refuse to do.
Not one but THREE request for Id Verification whcih I have already sent in
Funny thing is, from the first dispute there are several accoutns that just mysteriously dissappeared and it happned to be a few that were disputed.
What can I possibly do now?
Send them the disputes AGAIN and give them the second chance to fix their screw up when they didn't finish my investigation in the 30 days they were supposed to the first time?
They screwed up why should I have to submit ANOTHER dispute?
I know what will happen, they realized they messed up and will do it right the second time, why should they get a second chance and I get screwed out of deletions?
If 100% certain they are not his, then redispute using a police report....they'll take the dispute more seriously. Sometimes they'll do that if it was disputed before.
The FA is common if you ever disputed as "not mine" or questioned the ownership of the TL. It can be removed.
Here is my opinion of the travesty that the CRA is putting you through YOU DONT HAVE TO INVOLVE A CRA IN YOUR DISPUTE. Your dispute resides with the accuracy of what was reported, not with that fact that they reported it. The CRA has no ability to make any determination on the facts of a dispute, and thus is suiperfuous to the process.
Never, ever, never, ever file a dispute through a credit reporting agency.
They are just a middle-man in the process, and really have no right to censor or request anything involved in any disptue you have with someone who has posted disptued information to your credit file.
Congresss realizedt the normal stupidity of this process, and thus enacted FCRA 623(a)(8), providing consumers with direct dispute rghts to contact, directly, the party who posted the disputed information.. While implementation of this section of the FCRA was delayed until 7/1/2010, the final enacting reguations have now been published at 16 CFR 660.4, giving the consmer the right, as of 7/1/2010. to totally bypass the CRA, and to disptue directly with the party who reported the disputed information to the CRA.
Kick EX to the curb.
Suggested Direct Dispute letter to the party (OC or CA) who posted with the CRA:
“This is a Notice of Direct Dispute with you, under the provisions of FCRA §623(a)(8)(D), of the accuracy of information you have reported to my credit file.
► (If sent to a debt collector, (CA), it might be beneficial to also include the blurb:
► This is a direct dispute of your credit reporting, and is not a request for debt validation/verification under FDCPA §809(b).
(don’t let them just simply sluff it off as a meaningless DV letter)
“In compliance with FCRA §623(a)(8)(D), and enacting regulations published at 16 CFR § 660.4, this Notice of Direct Dispute includes:
“Identification of the specific information being disputed:
(specify the account number, and the specific information that is disputed under
that identifying account)
“Basis for the dispute:
(how the reporting was inaccurate; was any reporting in violation of any statutory or
regulatory provisions? Or account or express agreements, or CRA reporting gudelines? Not my account?)
“Supporting documentation:
(all documents that support your dispute; Make sure to include,
as part of your documentation, at least a copy of the portion only of your
recent credit report showing their reporting of the disputed information was
actually reported to your credit flle. The implementing rule requires showing
that it appeared in your credit report, but not a copy of your entire credit report.)
“Under the provisions of FCRA §623(a)(8)(E) and 16 CFR §660.4,, you have the duty to review all of the information I have provided to you, to complete your investigation of this Direct Dispute within 30-days of my Notice of Direct Dispute, and report back to me the results of your investigation within 5-days after your completion of your investigtion.”
“Should you find the disputed information to be inaccurate or incomplete, or you cannot verify the accuracy or completeness of the disputed information, you are additionally required, under FCRA 623(b)(1)(E), to promptly notify the credit reporting agencies of deletion of this information from my credit file.”
Robert,
You are indeed a very educated person, but your replies confuse the heck out of me! LOL
All I wanted was a simple answer, 1 dispute sent, id requested, id sent, dispute closed for no good reason, I sent them what they asked for.
Since the dispute didn't go through I sent the OC and the CA a DV, never got an answer, sent EX a dispute stating the OC and the CA never returned my request, since they had never been verified in the first place through the CRA and didn't send me validity of the debt, I told EX to delete them.
Nothing I said warranted a FA.
I never said the words, not mine, fraudulant, or ID theft.
So now,
EX in my opinion failed to properly investigate the accounts I disputed, what can I do about that to get these things deleted WITHOUT giving EX another chance, this seems to be their M O here lately. If they screw up and do not investigate your dispute because either they didn't get to it, couldn't get verification back from the people reporting it they pull this stunt to give them more time at the process.
@gdtobefree wrote:Nothing I said warranted a FA.
I never said the words, not mine, fraudulant, or ID theft.
What aspects of the TL were you disputing then? Have you tried a PFD yet?
No I am stumped at the reporting of it so far, I haven't even gotten past this yet.
I was kind of hoping to get them to go away.
I guess I will work on that instead, too bad they are going to get away with this.
Sorry I forgot to answer your question.
There is nothing on the account to dispute, it is BLANK, the only thing it has is an opened date that is it and their name and adresss of course but that is it.
The CA is changing it every 3-4 weeks, here shortly they will change it back to Factoring company account, with an amount higher then what he owed in the first place. They did the same thing last month.