No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Hello!! I am loving this website and have learned so much from everyone!!
I recently sent DVs to a few CA's on my CR. I am in Texas so I understand from reading prior posts that if they do not respond within 30 days that I can send that information to the CRA and request deletions. Correct?
So what would be in my letter? The confirmed delivery date of the CMRRR letter to the CA, the fact that they didn't respond (or hypothetically didn't respond appropriately) and then site Texas Finance Code 392.202....then do I just ask them to remove it?? I guess I'm just having trouble figuring out how to word that and I couldn't find any examples searching the boards.
And that type of letter to the CRA I send just CM? Correct? How long will it take them to respond? Or is there a time frame? I'm looking for any advice or suggestions!! Please help!!!
Also, what does the CRA do after they get my letter? I'm assuming they have to confirm that what I'm saying is true? What if the CA gives them an answer that they didn't give me??
Thanks!!!
The CRA verifying with the CA and you asking the CA for validation of a debt are two completely different things.
Even if the CA verifies with the CRA that the debt is allowed, they did not respond to your DV letter and that is what is more important. They cannot continue collection activity.
Send a copy of the letter you sent to the CA, a copy of the green card and tell the CRA that did not respond within the time allowed, per TX law, and ask them to delete it.
I would also file a complaint with the AG office for non compliance.
@Anonymous wrote:Hello!! I am loving this website and have learned so much from everyone!!
I recently sent DVs to a few CA's on my CR. I am in Texas so I understand from reading prior posts that if they do not respond within 30 days that I can send that information to the CRA and request deletions. Correct?
So what would be in my letter? The confirmed delivery date of the CMRRR letter to the CA, the fact that they didn't respond (or hypothetically didn't respond appropriately) and then site Texas Finance Code 392.202....then do I just ask them to remove it?? I guess I'm just having trouble figuring out how to word that and I couldn't find any examples searching the boards.
And that type of letter to the CRA I send just CM? Correct? How long will it take them to respond? Or is there a time frame? I'm looking for any advice or suggestions!! Please help!!!
Also, what does the CRA do after they get my letter? I'm assuming they have to confirm that what I'm saying is true? What if the CA gives them an answer that they didn't give me??
Thanks!!!
I sent you a private message with an example letter.
Crediseeker1,
Would you mind sending me an example as I am in the same predicament and they have yet to validate and they are still sending me collection notices and reported to the CRA. I have my Green sign cards and letter I sent.
Thanks
@Anonymous wrote:Crediseeker1,
Would you mind sending me an example as I am in the same predicament and they have yet to validate and they are still sending me collection notices and reported to the CRA. I have my Green sign cards and letter I sent.
Thanks
Kiesten,
I sent you a private message with an example letter.
In your written communications, whether it's with an OC, a CA, a CRA, or someone else, don't ever try to sound like a lawyer or use any of the various "Sample Letters" you can find online in many, many places.
By and large, many of us Credit Freaks consider them Nutcase Letters because the recipients of the Nutcase Letters probably pass them around the office saying, "Heh, read the letter I got from this Nutcase."
An ordinary person who sounds like a Nutcase in a letter might well be perceived as a Nutcase by a judge, if it ever came to that. Sounding like a Nutcase does not help your cause.
As an ordinary person, you want to speak in plain language, be brief but direct, and use only concise references to the law, FCRA, FDCPA, et al. If you author a diatribe thinking you sound like Cicero or Clarence Darrow, think Nutcase.
The only real merit to Nutcase Letters, IMHO, is for therapeutic reasons. If you're up against some immovable mountain--like a CA that won't take payments, but can't sue, and won't PFD--then Nutcase Letters do help one's mental state, and that is important. In rare instances only will a Nutcase Letter work.
I daresay real lawyers doing credit/debt issues don't spew long diatribes. They convey the message quickly and to the point.
I represent Mr. Noah P. Bodie in the matter of Account Number 666. Direct all communication to my office.
Ugh oh...don't sound like a nutcase? Might be hard for me, with or without a letter! LOL.
Thanks for the suggestion. Although I like sample letters because it's giving me the idea of how to approach what needs to be said, I agree that trying to sound too "official" could put me in a place that I don't want to be.
Thanks a bunch for the replies, I'm on the right track now.
When I do mail the requests to the CRAs, is it ok to send more than 1 letter in an envelope? Might sound like a crazy question, but I don't want someone opening an envelope from me with 3-4 individual requests in it, again, thinking I'm a nutcase! However, I'd like to save on postage if I could. If not, I understand!! Thanks!
When disputing with a CRA, I'd do just one letter containing all items in dispute. That way it puts more of an onus on them to complete the investigation, and perhaps more of a chance that they will do right and delete something which does not confirm. Also, multiple letters could result in them interpreting letter #2 as additional information for letter #1 and thus extend the investigation period from 30 to 45 days.
Well, I wouldn't be sending the initial disputes for investigation to them, this would be the copies of the DV letters that the CA's didn't respond to within the 30 days. So still OK to send all in one envelope? I had intented on stapling the cover letter to the CRA, the copy of the DV letter and my delivery proof together and then just enclosing several of those to each CRA. Does that make sense? I just didn't want it to seem strange to them to get a large envelope with several things in it, where things could get overlooked. But as I mentioned, I'd rather not pay postage for all those individual letters.
Thanks!
Ah, I get it now. Yes, one envelope is fine. Staple everything together so they get that it's supporting evidence of your dispute.