cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

Ok, so I've been waiting for June to begin, because there are several derogatory items on my reports that hit 7 years this month. Also 2 that are are 7 years and a few months old. Well last month I disputed the ones that are over 7 years. Just got the results from that dispute...no changes, nothing removed, they just updated that I disagree with the results. The others are all around 6 and a half years old. So my understanding is that once derogatory items hit 7 years they are removed from the report right? Well mine are still there and doesn't look like they are going anywhere. What gives? These are all charge off accounts that I either paid in full after charge off or settled for a lesser amount. so all balances report as $0. Reason I'm so frustrated is one of these is a repo, and our one and only car is quickly crapping out on us. I really need that repo gone so I can get the best terms possible or even just avoid being turned down for a loan altogether. any advise? Am I wrong about the timeline?
Message 1 of 11
10 REPLIES 10
OmarGB9
Community Leader
Super Contributor

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

Well, technically items can remain up to 7 years + 180 days, so in theory they could stay longer than the usual 7, though that doesn't typically happen. Have you tried asking the bureaus nicely for EE (early exclusion, NOT disputing).


Last App: 1/10/2023
Penfed Gold Visa Card

Currently rebuilding as of 04/11/2019.

Starting FICO 8 Scores:




Current FICO 8 scores:


Message 2 of 11
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

I called transunion and asked for ee, the cs rep ofcourse denied any such policy so asked to speak to a supervisor and they also denied it 100%. Called back and the cs rep said they would initiate a dispute against the age of those particular accounts. Well the dispute was resolved and every single account disputed remains. I havrnt tried with the other 2 bureaus yet. Cant remember right off hand which one typically just destroys the report whenever a dispute is initiated.
Message 3 of 11
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

Sorry to hear that. It's not the end of the world though, keep your chin up soldier Smiley Happy There are many dealerships who have second chance auto loans. You may have to pay a higher APR then refinance after a year though. How old is your repo? If it's 6 years or more, many dealerships disregard as it's too old. I'd say try Carmax and see what rates you get. 

Message 4 of 11
babygirl1256
Senior Contributor

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

Greetings 11bmac ~ I will private message you the Executive Special Handling Team numbers for Experian (EX) and TransUnion (TU) as they have always resolved issues for me and my daughter. Equifax (EQ) has been my greastest headache and you may not get the best results -but- keep trying!!!

Starting FICO 8 Score in 06/2019: EQ-625, TU-649, EX-640
Current FICO 8 Score in 06/2021: EQ-796, TU-806, EX-812
Goal FICO 8 Score in 06/2022: EQ-825, TU-850, EX-850
Message 5 of 11
WomanITGeek
Contributor

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?


@babygirl1256 wrote:

Greetings 11bmac ~ I will private message you the Executive Special Handling Team numbers for Experian (EX) and TransUnion (TU) as they have always resolved issues for me and my daughter. Equifax (EQ) has been my greastest headache and you may not get the best results -but- keep trying!!!


Hi, would you mind sending me the information as well? Trying to get EE for a paid CO that's scheduled to come off in Oct and so far no luck Smiley Sad

AMEX Gold: NPSL | Citi Custom Cash: $16,600 | Chase Freedom Unlimited: $15,600 | Chase Sapphire Reserve: $28,800 | Express (Comenity) $5000
Message 6 of 11
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

Thanks daisy, my scores are 690 and above across all scoring models right now, so I know I can get a loan, im just really super tired of having high interest rates. Or absolutely needing to put down a huge down payment just to secure the loan. For once I'd like to go I to a dealer and not be irritated the whole time they are shotgunning my credit just to tell me no or I need 6 grand down lol. If I can just get that repo off I'd feel much better about it.
Message 7 of 11
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?


@babygirl1256 wrote:

Greetings 11bmac ~ I will private message you the Executive Special Handling Team numbers for Experian (EX) and TransUnion (TU) as they have always resolved issues for me and my daughter. Equifax (EQ) has been my greastest headache and you may not get the best results -but- keep trying!!!


babygirl1256 would you mind sending me the number for EX's Executive Special handling Team? I have a PFD they have yet to act on despite the CA notifiying them twice. I even 'uploaded' a letter from the CA and no action yet.

 

I'd greatly appreciate it!

Message 8 of 11
203bravo
Established Contributor

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?

@Anonymous Just make sure you are considering the correct date. (I'm sure you are but it's worth mentioning)  Negative items are removed from your report 7 years from the date they first became delinquent and were never brought back to currnet and not from the date the account was opened. 

 

Say you bought a car in the year 2000 and paid on it for 3 years then for some reason it became delinquent and even repo in 2003.. it would be scheduled to be removed from the credit report in 2010 not 2007. 

 

If you pull your credit reports from annualcreditreport.com you will find either the date of first delinquency or the acutal estimated date of removal for the account to get a better idea of when to expect them to age off. 

Message 9 of 11
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Maybe I'm understanding it wrong?


@Anonymous wrote:
Ok, so I've been waiting for June to begin, because there are several derogatory items on my reports that hit 7 years this month. Also 2 that are are 7 years and a few months old. Well last month I disputed the ones that are over 7 years. Just got the results from that dispute...no changes, nothing removed, they just updated that I disagree with the results. The others are all around 6 and a half years old. So my understanding is that once derogatory items hit 7 years they are removed from the report right? Well mine are still there and doesn't look like they are going anywhere. What gives? These are all charge off accounts that I either paid in full after charge off or settled for a lesser amount. so all balances report as $0. Reason I'm so frustrated is one of these is a repo, and our one and only car is quickly crapping out on us. I really need that repo gone so I can get the best terms possible or even just avoid being turned down for a loan altogether. any advise? Am I wrong about the timeline?

+1 to above poster, you need to pull all 3 CRs from annual credit report, for free (no scores).

 

They spell out the actual age off dates. Disputing them and if the return verified and hadn't updated in some time will just tank your scores.

 

TU will list "estimated date of removal"

 

EX will list "on record until", this date should be different than both EQ and TU because they generally age off items at 6y 10m.

 

EQ will list "date of first delinquency" (not the also listed "date major delinquency first reported") and add 7 years to that date. It should age off 1 or 2 months prior to then.

 

I have really only found TU to be good with early exclusion. It is up to 6 months prior to the "estimated date of removal" date.

 

EX is 3 months EE, but they already build in 2 months of it into the "on record until" date, so you can call and request it 1 month earlier than the date listed. I hinestly found it easiest to let it age off on it's own. They age off more towards the end of the listed month.

 

EQ is like hot oil and water. Their EE is only 30d anyway, and they tend to age off items a month+ early, rendering the effort pointless. So not worth the risk, ime.

Message 10 of 11
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.