Community Ranks

[babygirl1256]

@M_Smart007 Thank you so much . . .this forum is awesome!!!

[M_Smart007]

@AllZero, Congratulations on your new rank of  "MEGA"Contributor

[CreditAggie]

I have ranked up to Super Contributor!

[FinStar]

---

@CreditAggie wrote:

I have ranked up to Super Contributor!

---

Way to go @CreditAggie and congrats on your new rank achievement!

[CreditAggie]

---

@FinStar wrote:

---

@CreditAggie wrote:

I have ranked up to Super Contributor!

---

Way to go @CreditAggie and congrats on your new rank achievement!

---

Thank you @FinStar !

[Oscarb93]

Thanks for the info! 

[mgood]

1052 is the magic number.

[FinStar]

---

@mgood wrote:

1052 is the magic number.

---

@mgood - keep in mind that this particular milestone is not widely the same outcome for every member ranking up. There are some educated guesses that have been posted upthread based on a variety of documented thresholds, but 1052 is not going to be the "magic number" [specific for this rank] for all members 😉

[mgood]

---

@FinStar wrote:

---

@mgood wrote:

1052 is the magic number.

---

@mgood - keep in mind that this particular milestone is not widely the same outcome for every member ranking up. There are some educated guesses that have been posted upthread based on a variety of documented thresholds, but 1052 is not going to be the "magic number" [specific for this rank] for all members 😉

---

I was wondering what the deal was. Looking at earlier posts, I thought it was at 1000. Then maybe 1051. Not sure why it was 1052. I have WAY more than the numbers that seem to be required for sign ins and minutes online. I'm over "Senior Contributor" level on those according to the list on Page 17.

So this is a game? Like trying to gather as many data points as we can to figure out exactly what makes FICO scores go up and down, we are trying to figure out the ranks in the same fashion?

[FinStar]

---

@mgood wrote:

---

@FinStar wrote:

---

@mgood wrote:

1052 is the magic number.

---

@mgood - keep in mind that this particular milestone is not widely the same outcome for every member ranking up. There are some educated guesses that have been posted upthread based on a variety of documented thresholds, but 1052 is not going to be the "magic number" [specific for this rank] for all members 😉

---

I was wondering what the deal was. Looking at earlier posts, I thought it was at 1000. Then maybe 1051. Not sure why it was 1052. I have WAY more than the numbers that seem to be required for sign ins and minutes online. I'm over "Senior Contributor" level on those according to the list on Page 17.

So this is a game? Like trying to gather as many data points as we can to figure out exactly what makes FICO scores go up and down, we are trying to figure out the ranks in the same fashion?

---

There is obviously a secret sauce, but the details will never be known. Secret sauce can also be subject to change. At best, algorithms determine whether certain criteria is met or achieved for ranking upward. So, an exercise in futility in trying to reverse engineer the process since all that has been known/shared over the years are some best guesstimates. 

FWIW, a rank level, especially in the higher tiers, doesn't always mean there's tangible quality either 😎