cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Ranks

Super Contributor

Re: Community Ranks

just keep being active and you'll get there eventually. one of the things believed to be taken into account is logins. so when you're done for a while, logout rather than just logging in in the morning and staying logged in all day long. og back in periodically as you return throughout the day.
Message 41 of 104
Member

Re: Community Ranks

I'm definitely glad this thread was a sticky. I was looking for this info as I try to increase my rank so I can put pics in my signature. As it stands currently a mod helped me out. 

 

Message 42 of 104
Frequent Contributor

Re: Community Ranks

As the result of your contributions to the community, you have earned a new rank. Your new rank is Regular Contributor.

 

Yah!  nice to have access to uploading images Smiley Happy)

EQ Fico 8 - 807
TU Fico 8 - 804
EX Fico 8 - 781
As of 09/03/17
Message 43 of 104
Valued Contributor

Re: Community Ranks


MidnightVoice wrote:

And the formula is as clear as the FICO formula  Smiley Very Happy

 

Obviously length of service (registration date) has little effect, as certain of us have been here since very soon after the forum opened  Smiley Very Happy


My fico forum AAOA Smiley LOLSmiley LOLSmiley Very Happy

TCL= $172,800
6-7-16: EQ 683 EX 713 TU 715
10-12-16 EQ 685 EX 706 TU 702 12-19-16 EQ 683 EX 704 TU 701 and CHILLING ON ICE...BRRRRR!
In the garden as of 6-7-16, I've been really really BADDDDD Smiley Sad Smiley Sad

Message 44 of 104
Super Contributor

Re: Community Ranks

I don't think kudos received has much to do with it as some of the super contributors have under 1500 received and a low percentage of posts to kudos. To me anything over 20% is good because that means much of what you say is of some value.
i am on mobile so i don't see your desktop signatures
Message 45 of 104
Valued Contributor

Re: Community Ranks


2011XTERROR wrote:
I don't think kudos received has much to do with it as some of the super contributors have under 1500 received and a low percentage of posts to kudos. To me anything over 20% is good because that means much of what you say is of some value.

Best I can telll the rankings are primarily based on # posts and minutes on-line. You need a certain minimum posts and minutes on-line to get to the next level. Others posters have presented data indicating # of sign-ins may be a factor as well. Kodos are not a factor. [system glitch on 7/22/2016 reset minutes on line dropping rank for many posters.]

 

A breakdown of minimum posts (and minutes on-line) for each rank is shown below. Not much data on sign-ins. [note: visitor rankings appear to follow the same QTY for posts as member rankings].

 

Added column with potential minimum on-line minutes based on glitch data. "Tested" thresholds for Established Member, Valued Member, New Contributor, Contributor, Regular Contributor and Frequent Contributor. [On-line minutes threshold over 3600 for Established Contributor per my data and feedback from SJ. On-line minutes threshold for Valued Contributor is around 8000 per Elim feedback]. Legendary threshold added 1/2018 based on Robert EG rank change.

 

Added column for sign-ins. Sign-in data reported for new member, established member and new contributor ranks

 

 Table last updated 1-2018

RankingPostsMinutes on-lineSign-ins
New Member151
Member56010
Established Member1018020
Valued Member2548050?
New Contributor5060075?
Contributor75720100
Regular contributor100840150?
Frequent Contributor250930250?
Established Contributor5004,000 500?
Valued Contributor10008,000 1000?
Senior Contributor300030,000 ?2000?
Super Contributor500075,000 ?3000?
Mega Contributor10,000150,000?5000?
Epic Contributor20,000250,000?7500?
Legendary Contributor30,000350,000?10,000?
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 46 of 104
Frequent Contributor

Re: Community Ranks


Thomas_Thumb wrote:

2011XTERROR wrote:
I don't think kudos received has much to do with it as some of the super contributors have under 1500 received and a low percentage of posts to kudos. To me anything over 20% is good because that means much of what you say is of some value.

Best I can telll the rankings are almost exclusively based on # posts. You need a certain minimum posts to get to the next level. Logins and kodos don't appear to be factors. Best I can tell is the change in rank is done manually but is likely triggered by an automatic notification. If the notification is not acted upon and forgotten, the user may not receive a higher ranking. A likely breakdown of minimum posts for each rank is shown below. [note: visitor rankings would follow the same QTY for posts as member rankings]

 

RankingPosts
New Member1
Member5
Established Member10
Valued Member25
New Contributor50
Contributor75
Regular contributor100
Frequent Contributor250
Established Contributor500
Valued Contributor1000
Senior Contributor3000
Super Contributor5000
Mega Contributor10,000
Epic Contributor20,000

 

 


It is actually not just by post count.  I was very curious myself when I joined because I have no experience with a lithium forum.  The formula can be tweaked be the admin/sysop, but here is an example of what it could be for a specific rank.   If you really are trying to rank up, then I suggest you make sure you do more than just post...lol.  When I was trying to rank up for image upload privileges, I was trying to have 2 logins per 1 post.  Give 2 kudos per every 1 kudos received, etc.  Basically, if you really contribute all around to the community, you will rank up Smiley Happy

 

Source: https://community.lithium.com/t5/Strategy-and-Best-Practices/Ranking-Structure/td-p/161264

 

(logins >10) && (registrationAge >= 129600) && (((net_threads) + (net_replies*2) + (net_blog_articles*10) + (net_blog_comments) + (net_idea_threads*5) + (net_idea_comments)) >=100) && (((net_kudos_events_given) + (net_kudos_events_received*2) + (net_accepted_solutions*10) + (tagging_tag_count)) >=20)

EQ Fico 8 - 807
TU Fico 8 - 804
EX Fico 8 - 781
As of 09/03/17
Message 47 of 104
Super Contributor

Re: Community Ranks

I am at almost 8k.
i am on mobile so i don't see your desktop signatures
Message 48 of 104
Valued Contributor

Re: Community Ranks


palmdale wrote:


It is actually not just by post count.  The formula can be tweaked be the admin/sysop, but here is an example of what it could be for a specific rank. 

 

Source: https://community.lithium.com/t5/Strategy-and-Best-Practices/Ranking-Structure/td-p/161264

 

(logins >10) && (registrationAge >= 129600) && (((net_threads) + (net_replies*2) + (net_blog_articles*10) + (net_blog_comments) + (net_idea_threads*5) + (net_idea_comments)) >=100) && (((net_kudos_events_given) + (net_kudos_events_received*2) + (net_accepted_solutions*10) + (tagging_tag_count)) >=20)


The posts listed are minimum thresholds. Take a look at users for each ranking category and let me know if you see any posters that achieve the designated ranking with fewer than the listed posts.

 

Certainly you can be "passed over" and not receive a higher ranking. That's not unlikely if some other criteria was not satisfied.

 

Of course some of this is conjucture - but the rankings are very highly correlated with # posts.  Ratio of posts to kudos whether 3:1  or 10:1 seems to have little impact in moving up the ranks. Also, posters who give very few kudos .don't appear to be held back in rankings. Lack of initiating new threads also appears to have little impact on ability to move up. On the other hand, minutes on-line is important - but that typically correlates with having more posts.

Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 49 of 104
Frequent Contributor

Re: Community Ranks

I have never heard of someone setting up a forum which required the Admin/moderator to approve ranks.  I highly doubt that is happening here.  Post count most likely plays a large role in the ranking system, but I wouldn't discount the other factors.  As you can see in the example code I posted, if you don't meet the differenct sets of criteria, you will not rank up.  

 

 

Example:  

You have 200,000 posts, but you have only 100 logins.  In this forum, you will most likely still be stuck at a low rank, until you meet the minimum threshold for the logins category in the ranking formula.   Many different variables could be holding you back from ranking up, even with a crazy post count.  That is the brilliance of the Lithium ranking system Smiley Happy  You are rewarded for being being an all around (Active) user, and not just a post spammer. 

EQ Fico 8 - 807
TU Fico 8 - 804
EX Fico 8 - 781
As of 09/03/17
Message 50 of 104