Question about rules

[Anonymous]

Someone apparently had a post deleted for asking about freezing a report in the hopes a creditor would look at a different one. Why? What am I missing here?

[Anonymous]

Sorry for double post. It said there was an error but posted it anyways

[Anonymous]

It is a topic of high criticality on this forum. Everyone's viewpoint is different but it appears that the stance has been taken to disallow it's mere mention regardless if you are for or against.

In short. There are other places to discuss such things as it has been made sufficiently clear that the topic is taboo here.

[MarineVietVet]

---

@Anonymous wrote:
It is a topic of high criticality on this forum. Everyone's viewpoint is different but it appears that the stance has been taken to disallow it's mere mention regardless if you are for or against.

In short. There are other places to discuss such things as it has been made sufficiently clear that the topic is taboo here.

---

The only viewpoint that matters is the one held by the administrators of this site.

They have deemed the advocacy/discussion of this subject verboten.

[MarineVietVet]

---

@Anonymous wrote:
Sorry for double post. It said there was an error but posted it anyways

---

No problem. I removed the duplicate.

[Anonymous]

---

@MarineVietVet wrote:

---

@Anonymous wrote:
It is a topic of high criticality on this forum. Everyone's viewpoint is different but it appears that the stance has been taken to disallow it's mere mention regardless if you are for or against.

In short. There are other places to discuss such things as it has been made sufficiently clear that the topic is taboo here.

---

The only viewpoint that matters is the one held by the administrators of this site.

They have deemed the advocacy/discussion of this subject verboten.

---

Right, this is the point I was conveying to the OP.