No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Several weeks ago, I got with the company that owned my SL and got them to agree to offering me good will on my fully-paid account. A couple days ago, CreditKarma showed that the lates were indeed removed on my closed account with them, however I saw no score increase... Not a single point. However, on Credit.com it still shows I have those lates.
Which one of these should I go with? I went to check with the three credit bureaus and possibly dispute any lates that they may show that belonged to this account, but none of them showed any lates.
Wouldn't 7 lates being removed cause an increase in my score? I know having them certainly hurt it.
Depends on what they were, and how old they were. If they were 30 day lates, they have no effect after 24 months.
They were a mix of 90's and 120's. It's also been less than a year. That's why I'm confused.
Might be a 'scoring bucket' thing. I'm not quite sure how that works.... Maybe someone else can chime in.
But like I tell others, don't sweat the scores, as long as you are getting the derogs off, working on building new positive lines, and keeping current on everything, the scores will rebound over time.
I appreciate your input!
@Anonymous wrote:Depends on what they were, and how old they were. If they were 30 day lates, they have no effect after 24 months.
We need to be careful about absolutes and generalizations. There are very few set in concrete rules in the credit scoring world.
It's not just the age of lates but also how many are reporting at any one time.
I agree that a single 30 day late will probably lose much of it's impact after a couple of years but since everyone's credit profile is different there is no guarantee how little or how much a score might be affected after that time period.
Thank you for your reply. I'm wondering if I've just hit a road block on raising my score anymore until I have more of a history. For my age, my score is great (I'm 22). My report has three credit cards on it with less than 20% usage on all of them, a paid off student loan (now with no lates), no collections, no other lates, and a car loan. However, my history is only 2 years old. Could this be holding me back?
@Anonymous wrote:Thank you for your reply. I'm wondering if I've just hit a road block on raising my score anymore until I have more of a history. For my age, my score is great (I'm 22). My report has three credit cards on it with less than 20% usage on all of them, a paid off student loan (now with no lates), no collections, no other lates, and a car loan. However, my history is only 2 years old. Could this be holding me back?
...generally 24 mts of on-time payments with no negs will tend to max the payments section of FICO's scoring model ...but "generally" is meaningless with FICO because there are so many other factors considered, many of which can only be guessed at ...Average Age of Accounts (AAoA) is probably a factor affecting your current scores but since you have not given enough info on that, its difficult to even guess.
...some credit monitoring sites such as CK get faster updates than myFico because they are owned by a CRA ...you didn't indicate a time-frame in your post ...it may just be a matter of waiting for the changes to hit myFICO ...and afaik CK uses a FAKO score model that doesn't weight Student Loans like FICO does ...hth