cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%

tag
masscredit
Senior Contributor

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%

Update for this month - I usually run about $825.-$850. through my cards for normal expenses each month. I let $836. post to my Barclay card. That's 3% utilization. Just recieved two Score Watch alerts that said my EQ 08 score lost 8 points and showed the balance increase.  Went from 686 - 680. Will be interesting to see if my other scores change.  My EQ 04 is rock solid at 699. I've had higher utilization, lower utilization but it will not budge from that number unless it's a big increase.  I just want one more point. Just want to hit 700. Then I'll be happy. Actually, I'll want more then but I really want that one point!

 

I mentioned that I was waiting for my TU score to post last month. Getting my UTl down to .002% didn't do anything with that. Merrick's Go Score along with some other FAKOs have shown some upward movement. Either because of the ultra-low utilization or because inquiries from 2 years ago fell off. I just watch them for account info and know that the scores don't hold water. 

 

So back to my 8 point loss. I think that's a big drop for only having a total utilization of 3%. Maybe it's because the account balance increased by 1316%? 

 

Something else that I'm wondering, if a person usually has low utilization, like 2-3%. Has that for a few months then lets it jump up to 7-8%, will their score take a hit because the utilization is usually lower? I'd say no but maybe? 

 

EQ - 698 / TU - 672 / EX - 686

Capital One Savor - $16000 / Capital One Venture - $13000 / Travel Advantage Visa - $11500 / TD Cash Card - $7500 / Bread Rewards AMEX - $6950 / Apple Card - $6500 / TD Double Up - $5500 / Mercury - $5000 / Ally Master Card - $4300 / DCU Visa - $3000 / Capital One QuickSilver - $500
$79,750
DCU Auto Loan
Message 21 of 28
vanillabean
Valued Contributor

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%


@masscredit wrote:
 

So back to my 8 point loss. I think that's a big drop for only having a total utilization of 3%. Maybe it's because the account balance increased by 1316%? 

 

Something else that I'm wondering, if a person usually has low utilization, like 2-3%. Has that for a few months then lets it jump up to 7-8%, will their score take a hit because the utilization is usually lower? I'd say no but maybe? 


 

Utilization is not everything; absolute total balance matters too. So yes.

 

Utilization has no history. So no. But the change in itself will matter.

 

Message 22 of 28
masscredit
Senior Contributor

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%

Another update that might help some. As I've mentioned before, I usually let one card report a balance each month. Well, I ran into a little problem last month. Cap 1 charged me membership fees earlier than they told me they were going to. That happened the day the statement closed so I didn't have a chance to pay them which resulted in 3 cards reporting a balance. The card that usually reports a balance was at $836., one Cap 1 at $59. and the other at $39.  The two Cap 1s didn't have high balances but they still had balances. I lost points for that. And then I changed which one card will normally report a balance. But... that card didn't report until 2 weeks after the statement closed so I had 4 cards reporting.  The balance on the forth card is $753.  Total utilization was only 6% but I lost more points. Ex 08 went from 686 down to 658.  The card that had the $836 balance finally updated with a zero balance today. That amount was 13% of the card's available credit.   I gained 23 points after it reported zero.

 

I'm not expecting a many points after the two Cap 1 cards report. Both of them closed at $0.00 yesterday. I should at least get my 5-6 points back.

 

 

 

 

EQ - 698 / TU - 672 / EX - 686

Capital One Savor - $16000 / Capital One Venture - $13000 / Travel Advantage Visa - $11500 / TD Cash Card - $7500 / Bread Rewards AMEX - $6950 / Apple Card - $6500 / TD Double Up - $5500 / Mercury - $5000 / Ally Master Card - $4300 / DCU Visa - $3000 / Capital One QuickSilver - $500
$79,750
DCU Auto Loan
Message 23 of 28
MarineVietVet
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%


@masscredit wrote:

Another update that might help some. As I've mentioned before, I usually let one card report a balance each month. Well, I ran into a little problem last month. Cap 1 charged me membership fees earlier than they told me they were going to. That happened the day the statement closed so I didn't have a chance to pay them which resulted in 3 cards reporting a balance. The card that usually reports a balance was at $836., one Cap 1 at $59. and the other at $39.  The two Cap 1s didn't have high balances but they still had balances. I lost points for that. And then I changed which one card will normally report a balance. But... that card didn't report until 2 weeks after the statement closed so I had 4 cards reporting.  The balance on the forth card is $753.  Total utilization was only 6% but I lost more points. Ex 08 went from 686 down to 658.  The card that had the $836 balance finally updated with a zero balance today. That amount was 13% of the card's available credit.   I gained 23 points after it reported zero.

 

I'm not expecting a many points after the two Cap 1 cards report. Both of them closed at $0.00 yesterday. I should at least get my 5-6 points back.

 

 

 

 


It's definitely a YMMV situation. Everyone has to experiment on their own.

Message 24 of 28
NRB525
Super Contributor

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%


@masscredit wrote:

Another update that might help some. As I've mentioned before, I usually let one card report a balance each month. Well, I ran into a little problem last month. Cap 1 charged me membership fees earlier than they told me they were going to. That happened the day the statement closed so I didn't have a chance to pay them which resulted in 3 cards reporting a balance. The card that usually reports a balance was at $836., one Cap 1 at $59. and the other at $39.  The two Cap 1s didn't have high balances but they still had balances. I lost points for that. And then I changed which one card will normally report a balance. But... that card didn't report until 2 weeks after the statement closed so I had 4 cards reporting.  The balance on the forth card is $753.  Total utilization was only 6% but I lost more points. Ex 08 went from 686 down to 658.  The card that had the $836 balance finally updated with a zero balance today. That amount was 13% of the card's available credit.   I gained 23 points after it reported zero.

 

I'm not expecting a many points after the two Cap 1 cards report. Both of them closed at $0.00 yesterday. I should at least get my 5-6 points back.

 

 

 

 


Interesting thread, thanks for taking the time over the months to update your experience.

 

A comment, and not directed at anyone on this thread, but I see it everywhere on MyFICO posts. People are totally focused on Utilization balance, which is 30% of your overal FICO score. But the FICO is weighted 35% based on Payment History, according to the "what's in my credit score" page elsewhere on this site. That's two words: Payment and History.

 

My opinion is that many new members on here, who have a few cards on hand and are trying to decide whether to carry $1 on only one card, $0 on the others, or maybe MAYBE let that one card go to $10 are missing the point. You have a credit card to obtain credit. A credit card company gives you a card to prove you are trustworthy, to lend. The FICO score then measures the complex relationship, over time, of your experience with credit.

 

If you look closely at your credit report details, if you have no balance on a card, you have no payment for that month. If you have no payments over time, guess what, you aren't building Payment History (there's those two words again). Many new members do not have extensive payment history. Tweaking the utilization percentage now isn't going to get you over 700, you need to show you can borrow a little bit and pay it back, and leave breadcrumbs in your credit history so the FICO score can grab hold of that and say "hey, look, this person pays back their borrowings for XX months". Does it take a while? Sure, that's why they call it history. But during the last year, has utilization management really moved the needle in your FICO quest?

 

Now, you will note my signature has high utilization. I am not advocating that. But my score is kept out of the toilet because I have decades of perfect Payment History. For me, working on Utilization is definitely MY action item.

 

MVV has an 850 FICO because of a combination of credit history and utilization management, not because of utilization management alone.

 

Cheers!

High Bal Jan 2009 $116k on $146k limits 80% Util.
Oct 2014 $46k on $127k 36% util EQ 722 TU 727 EX 727
April 2018 $18k on $344k 5% util EQ 806 TU 810 EX 812
Jan 2019 $7.6k on $360k EQ 832 TU 839 EX 831
March 2021 $33k on $312k EQ 796 TU 798 EX 801
May 2021 Paid all Installments and Mortgages, one new Mortgage EQ 761 TY 774 EX 777
April 2022 EQ=811 TU=807 EX=805 - TU VS 3.0 765
Message 25 of 28
masscredit
Senior Contributor

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%

Very good point!  The thing about utilization is it's something that we can control now. Like instant gratifiation. This morning I was thinking that I might swap cards that report a balance again. The Barclay card that usually reports only has a $2500. CL while my other Barclay card was just increased to $800. I usually let a balance between $750. and $850 report. Figure $800. average. That's 32% of that one card's available credit but it would be 10% of the other card's CL. Then I figured I can tweek the amount that reports a little more to only have $600. report so it shows about 8% utilization. Then continue that monthly.

 

I've had higher balances report in the past. Mainly because I had to. Now I'm able to control how much is on my cards. 

 

I haven't looked over my reports recently but you mentioned something that I've been wondering. When high balances report, is it the high balance during anytime that you've had the card or the high balance when the statement closed. I've run some cards up close to their limit recently but had them paid off before the statement closed. 

 

As for MVV... I did a triple take when I saw his signiture the other day then thought "ding, ding, ding.... he wins!" Smiley Happy 

 

 

 

EQ - 698 / TU - 672 / EX - 686

Capital One Savor - $16000 / Capital One Venture - $13000 / Travel Advantage Visa - $11500 / TD Cash Card - $7500 / Bread Rewards AMEX - $6950 / Apple Card - $6500 / TD Double Up - $5500 / Mercury - $5000 / Ally Master Card - $4300 / DCU Visa - $3000 / Capital One QuickSilver - $500
$79,750
DCU Auto Loan
Message 26 of 28
MarineVietVet
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%


@NRB525 wrote:


 


Interesting thread, thanks for taking the time over the months to update your experience.

 

A comment, and not directed at anyone on this thread, but I see it everywhere on MyFICO posts. People are totally focused on Utilization balance, which is 30% of your overal FICO score. But the FICO is weighted 35% based on Payment History, according to the "what's in my credit score" page elsewhere on this site. That's two words: Payment and History.

 

My opinion is that many new members on here, who have a few cards on hand and are trying to decide whether to carry $1 on only one card, $0 on the others, or maybe MAYBE let that one card go to $10 are missing the point. You have a credit card to obtain credit. A credit card company gives you a card to prove you are trustworthy, to lend. The FICO score then measures the complex relationship, over time, of your experience with credit.

 

If you look closely at your credit report details, if you have no balance on a card, you have no payment for that month. If you have no payments over time, guess what, you aren't building Payment History (there's those two words again). Many new members do not have extensive payment history. Tweaking the utilization percentage now isn't going to get you over 700, you need to show you can borrow a little bit and pay it back, and leave breadcrumbs in your credit history so the FICO score can grab hold of that and say "hey, look, this person pays back their borrowings for XX months". Does it take a while? Sure, that's why they call it history. But during the last year, has utilization management really moved the needle in your FICO quest?

 

Now, you will note my signature has high utilization. I am not advocating that. But my score is kept out of the toilet because I have decades of perfect Payment History. For me, working on Utilization is definitely MY action item.

 

MVV has an 850 FICO because of a combination of credit history and utilization management, not because of utilization management alone.

 

Cheers!


You make some very good points.

 

Payment history is indeed the #1 most important aspect of scoring but if you have a bad payment history often only time will correct things.

 

The advantage of proper utilization management is the fact you can improve scores very quickly over a matter of months and not years.

 

I agree that it's a combination of all factors that leads to good scores.

 

ETA: Here is a breakdown of my credit profile:

 

* No late payments showing

* Utilization 1%

* Age of oldest account 26 years

* AAoA of nine years

* No inquiries

* No new credit applied for in 18 months

Message 27 of 28
NRB525
Super Contributor

Re: Any Difference When UTIL is Below 9%


@masscredit wrote:

Very good point!  The thing about utilization is it's something that we can control now. Like instant gratifiation. This morning I was thinking that I might swap cards that report a balance again. The Barclay card that usually reports only has a $2500. CL while my other Barclay card was just increased to $800. I usually let a balance between $750. and $850 report. Figure $800. average. That's 32% of that one card's available credit but it would be 10% of the other card's CL. Then I figured I can tweek the amount that reports a little more to only have $600. report so it shows about 8% utilization. Then continue that monthly.

 

I've had higher balances report in the past. Mainly because I had to. Now I'm able to control how much is on my cards. 

 

I haven't looked over my reports recently but you mentioned something that I've been wondering. When high balances report, is it the high balance during anytime that you've had the card or the high balance when the statement closed. I've run some cards up close to their limit recently but had them paid off before the statement closed. 

 

As for MVV... I did a triple take when I saw his signiture the other day then thought "ding, ding, ding.... he wins!" Smiley Happy 

 

 

 


Unfortunately I'm not able to answer that one, because I don't ever pay before the statement cuts.

Just to explain terms as I see them,

 

When you swipe the card, that is the day of the charge. If one PIF, no interest starts. If one has a balance over two statements, it starts the interest clock for this transaction from this day.

 

There is a day the "statement closes" for new transactions. My understanding is many try to pay the balance down before this day (necessary to manage the reported balance). This is likely what you see when you look at your credit report. (If you get a copy of your credit report, and your Money software is maintained, you can usually parse which balance was used in the credit report) [This "statement close" date may or may not be the previous month's "due date" for your payment]

 

A few short days later, is the "Statement Date" which is printed on the PDF, and that is when any interest is posted.

 

Some time in this date range is the Credit Reporting date. I'm not clear on how each bank reports these, but apparently in Credit Karma they have a calendar of estimated reporting dates for each bank. The balance reported should be based on the "Statement Date" because as noted earlier, new annual fee charges are included in this amount, and they probably post on the Statement Date.

 

Some few weeks later is the "Due Date". PIF by this date or start interest (if not already calculating interest). At the very least, of course, pay the minimum due or risk a late pay note.

 

And yes, MVV and a very few others win Smiley Happy

High Bal Jan 2009 $116k on $146k limits 80% Util.
Oct 2014 $46k on $127k 36% util EQ 722 TU 727 EX 727
April 2018 $18k on $344k 5% util EQ 806 TU 810 EX 812
Jan 2019 $7.6k on $360k EQ 832 TU 839 EX 831
March 2021 $33k on $312k EQ 796 TU 798 EX 801
May 2021 Paid all Installments and Mortgages, one new Mortgage EQ 761 TY 774 EX 777
April 2022 EQ=811 TU=807 EX=805 - TU VS 3.0 765
Message 28 of 28
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.