cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Credit Sesame score

tag
Kathy4NU
Frequent Contributor

Credit Sesame score

Haha, my Credit Sesame score is 774!

 

My credit union pulled my report 10 days ago and said my score was 613,

 

I guess that is why a FAKO is a FAKO.

 

(I did notice that my two defaulted student loans were removed so I suspect my score did go up some but not that many points)




June '12: EQ 553 TU 0 EX 545
April '13 Lender Pull EQ 731, EX 692, TU 722 - all FICO

Closed on home May 22, 2013 at 2:00pm!!!
CU Visa $1000, VS $350, Chase Freedom $1000, Discover IT $2500, Home Depot: $2700, Menards $3000, NFM $3500
What's been deleted: 32 collections, 5 PR, 2 tax liens, defaulted student loans
Message 1 of 20
19 REPLIES 19
namvet
Established Contributor

Re: Credit Sesame score

Which bureau did your credit union pull?  Credit Sesame uses info obtained from your Ex file.

Message 2 of 20
Kathy4NU
Frequent Contributor

Re: Credit Sesame score


@namvet wrote:

Which bureau did your credit union pull?  Credit Sesame uses info obtained from your Ex file.


Experian.




June '12: EQ 553 TU 0 EX 545
April '13 Lender Pull EQ 731, EX 692, TU 722 - all FICO

Closed on home May 22, 2013 at 2:00pm!!!
CU Visa $1000, VS $350, Chase Freedom $1000, Discover IT $2500, Home Depot: $2700, Menards $3000, NFM $3500
What's been deleted: 32 collections, 5 PR, 2 tax liens, defaulted student loans
Message 3 of 20
dddewdrop
Valued Contributor

Re: Credit Sesame score

Geez. That is some discepancy. Well at least you are an educated consumer and know a fico from a fako.

Message 4 of 20
dodgerslv
Valued Contributor

Re: Credit Sesame score


@Kathy4NU wrote:

Haha, my Credit Sesame score is 774!

 

My credit union pulled my report 10 days ago and said my score was 613,

 

I guess that is why a FAKO is a FAKO.

 

(I did notice that my two defaulted student loans were removed so I suspect my score did go up some but not that many points)


wow....that is a very big difference but dont feel bad, my CS score has me at 657(Fair), Quizzle at 761(Excellent), Credt.com Exp Vantage at 701(low C) and estimates my EX Fico at 684 (that would be fair i guess) while Experian Plus has me at 700(Good)....Im just all over the place when it comes to what my EX FAKO is...LOL

gardening since 5/21/2016
Message 5 of 20
mitchblue
Valued Contributor

Re: Credit Sesame score

My EX on here is 776 and credit sasame is 749 so not too far off..

FICO® 8 Scores 821 FICO® 9 Equifax 826 (Updated 02-7-23)
Message 6 of 20
sportsguy83
Regular Contributor

Re: Credit Sesame score

That is a bit odd. My CS is 681 and my last EX was 678 so hardly any difference.

Beginning Rebuilding - February 2022

Current Scores - June 2023

Goal Scores - January 2024

Message 7 of 20
Revelate
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Credit Sesame score

Old thread but sometimes CS (and other FAKO's) track closely to one's FICO's, and other times they're way off.

 

It's all coincidence unfortunately: put simply, the algorithms in question don't score identical information the same way.




        
Message 8 of 20
mitchblue
Valued Contributor

Re: Credit Sesame score

I didn't realize it was an old thread..sorry.


@Revelate wrote:

Old thread but sometimes CS (and other FAKO's) track closely to one's FICO's, and other times they're way off.

 

It's all coincidence unfortunately: put simply, the algorithms in question don't score identical information the same way.


 

FICO® 8 Scores 821 FICO® 9 Equifax 826 (Updated 02-7-23)
Message 9 of 20
Revelate
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Credit Sesame score


@mitchblue wrote:

I didn't realize it was an old thread..sorry.


@Revelate wrote:

Old thread but sometimes CS (and other FAKO's) track closely to one's FICO's, and other times they're way off.

 

It's all coincidence unfortunately: put simply, the algorithms in question don't score identical information the same way.


 


No worries Smiley Happy.  Google I blame you!  

 

It would be nice to filter search results by date of posting somehow either here in Lithium or more importantly by Google... working on a project now that is on the pointy edge of said spear, and anything not written within the last few months is a near useless result on my searches.  Worse, so many people don't date their posts, le sigh.  Least Lithium gets that right.

 

At least this post is just as relevant now as the day it was written, not a problem recycling those unlike some others that get necromanced.




        
Message 10 of 20
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.