cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

tag
MrsCHX
Valued Contributor

Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

I don't pay for MyFICO at the moment. I'm currently waiting for a bunch of balances to report in August (I hope they report timely because multiple accounts were paid to $0!)

 

I logged in today and happened to notice that FICO reports my aggregate utilization as 49% now, and while I mysteriously lost 6 points last week (I can't figure it out as I've been paying balances down consistently all year), dropping below 49% did not result in a change at all.

 

I know that part is that there are still cards individually reporting high utilization; however, I've always read that aggregate util matters more than individual (and yes, I know that # of cards with a balance matters too). It'll be several weeks before the new statement date for all of the paid off cards, so I'll have to check back at that time to see the impact.

drop to 49%.jpg

Capital One Savor: $6,000; Mission Lane: $4,500; PenFed Power Cash Rewards: $3,500; Nordstrom Visa: $3,300; Capital One: $2,550; PenFed Gold: $2,500;
Store Cards: Kohls $2,500; Home Depot: $1,500; Amazon: $1,000; Target: $900; LOFT: $700
Message 1 of 12
11 REPLIES 11
Vinjints
Regular Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

I've also wondered if rounding is taken into account before points are given/taken. Is that 48.9% or 49.2% utilization? I don't know if it matters.

Message 2 of 12
MrsCHX
Valued Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

Same!

 

But next month I'll have a card that was at 91% post 0% and one at 82% post 0%. Plus some other smaller balances as a result of normal spending. Now that the big 2 are paid off, I'm going to try to go AZEO and see how that reflects.

Capital One Savor: $6,000; Mission Lane: $4,500; PenFed Power Cash Rewards: $3,500; Nordstrom Visa: $3,300; Capital One: $2,550; PenFed Gold: $2,500;
Store Cards: Kohls $2,500; Home Depot: $1,500; Amazon: $1,000; Target: $900; LOFT: $700
Message 3 of 12
FicoMike0
Valued Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

You should see something from dropping below 49%. Did something else change? Was the 91% card at 88% before?

 

Message 4 of 12
MrsCHX
Valued Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase


@FicoMike0 wrote:

You should see something from dropping below 49%. Did something else change? Was the 91% card at 88% before?

 


No, the 91% card has been at that high util for a while. 

 

As I think through what has changed, I closed CreditOne, reducing available credit. Could that be it??

Capital One Savor: $6,000; Mission Lane: $4,500; PenFed Power Cash Rewards: $3,500; Nordstrom Visa: $3,300; Capital One: $2,550; PenFed Gold: $2,500;
Store Cards: Kohls $2,500; Home Depot: $1,500; Amazon: $1,000; Target: $900; LOFT: $700
Message 5 of 12
FicoMike0
Valued Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

If that kept you above 49%, that would explain it.

You should see improvement as you bring down those maxed out accounts. Remember, they'll score the highest individual account, as well as aggregate.

Good luck!

 

Message 6 of 12
FlaDude
Valued Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase


@MrsCHX wrote:


As I think through what has changed, I closed CreditOne, reducing available credit. Could that be it??


AFAIK, absolute CL is not a score factor so the effect of closing cards is down to how it affects utilization.

 

After paying down, do you still have any maxed out cards (>89%)? If not, that should provide a boost when those report. Hopefully you'll see good results soon.

Scores: March 21 FICO 8: EX 810, TU 808, EQ 813
AoOA: closed: 40 years, open: 30 years; AAoA: 14 years
Amex Gold, Amex Blue, Amex ED, Amex Delta Blue, Amex Hilton Surpass, BoA Platinum Plus, Chase Freedom Unlimited, Chase Amazon, Chase CSP, Chase United Explorer, Citi AA, Sync Lowes, total CL 203k
Message 7 of 12
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

When you pay those 2 cards to $0 what will be your highest utilization on cards still posting a balance? Also, what will be your resultant aggregate utilization?

 

Do you have any AMEX charge cards, closed loop store cards, credit union cards or PLOCs?

 

Closed loop = not cobranded and limited to use at store only.

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 8 of 12
MrsCHX
Valued Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase

When those last two are paid, I'll have $390/1500 at Home Depot (0% offer) so 25% util and 60% on Savor (0% til November) reporting.

 

No PLOC, no AMEX charge cards. 


I have two PenFed cards and store cards (Target, Home Depot, Amazon, Kohls, LOFT).

Capital One Savor: $6,000; Mission Lane: $4,500; PenFed Power Cash Rewards: $3,500; Nordstrom Visa: $3,300; Capital One: $2,550; PenFed Gold: $2,500;
Store Cards: Kohls $2,500; Home Depot: $1,500; Amazon: $1,000; Target: $900; LOFT: $700
Message 9 of 12
SouthJamaica
Mega Contributor

Re: Dropping below 50% aggregate utilization did not result in a FICO score increase


@MrsCHX wrote:

I don't pay for MyFICO at the moment. I'm currently waiting for a bunch of balances to report in August (I hope they report timely because multiple accounts were paid to $0!)

 

I logged in today and happened to notice that FICO reports my aggregate utilization as 49% now, and while I mysteriously lost 6 points last week (I can't figure it out as I've been paying balances down consistently all year), dropping below 49% did not result in a change at all.

 

I know that part is that there are still cards individually reporting high utilization; however, I've always read that aggregate util matters more than individual (and yes, I know that # of cards with a balance matters too). It'll be several weeks before the new statement date for all of the paid off cards, so I'll have to check back at that time to see the impact.

drop to 49%.jpg


In my opinion there are no magic thresholds in aggregate revolving utilization. 


Total revolving limits 568220 (504020 reporting) FICO 8: EQ 689 TU 691 EX 682




Message 10 of 12
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.