No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
An inquiry aged past the 1 year mark on my Equifax report today and my EQ 08 FICO score rose from 846 to 850. I still have 1 inquiry in the last year.
My EQ FICO 9 was already at 850 with 3 inquiries. My Experian FICO 9 was at 850 with 9 inquiries. This seems to suggest that inquires are either not being counted by FICO 9 or that there is a larger buffer above 850 in FICO 9.
My inquiries on Experian have now decreased from 9 to 4 and my industry enhanced scores have not changed. My inquires on Equifax have decreased from 3 to 1 and my FICO 9 industry enhanced scores have increased with each aging off of an inquiry. This seems to suggest that FICO 9 industry enhanced scores only count 3 inquiries.
So the question is, do FICO 9 Classic scores ignore inquiries or is the buffer area above 850 large enough for 3 inquires. Since my FICO 9 Classic scores are 850, I don't have enough data points to make this determination.
Equifax FICO Model | 2/18/2016 | 6/9/2016 | 6/10/2016 |
# Cards Reporting Balances | 2 of 36 | 2 of 30 | 1 of 30 |
# Inquiries | 3 | 2 | 1 |
AAoA | 9Y 9M | 10Y 1M | 10Y 1M |
Aggregate Utilization | < 1% | < 1% | < 1% |
Highest CC Utilization | <1% | 9.50% | <1% |
EQ FICO 04 | 780 | 803 | 814 |
Auto Enhanced 04 | 800 | 822 | 832 |
Bankcard Enhanced 04 | 777 | 798 | 808 |
EQ FICO 08 | 839 | 846 | 850 |
Auto Enhanced 08 | 842 | 849 | 856 |
Bankcard Enhanced 08 | 864 | 871 | 878 |
EQ FICO 9 | 850 | 850 | 850 |
Auto Enhanced 9 | 877 | 886 | 892 |
Bankcard Enhanced 9 | 877 | 884 | 888 |
Total CL: $321.7k | UTL: 2% | AAoA: 7.0yrs | Baddies: 0 | Other: Lease, Loan, *No Mortgage, All Inq's from Jun '20 Car Shopping |
Outstanding. Congratulations!
@oilcan12 wrote:An inquiry aged off of my Equifax report today and my EQ 08 FICO score rose from 846 to 850. I still have 1 inquiry in the last year.
My EQ FICO 9 was already at 850 with 3 inquiries. My Experian FICO 9 was at 850 with 9 inquiries. This seems to suggest that inquires are either not being counted by FICO 9 or that there is a larger buffer above 850 in FICO 9.
My inquiries on Experian have now decreased from 9 to 4 and my industry enhanced scores have not changed. My inquires on Equifax have decreased from 3 to 1 and my FICO 9 industry enhanced scores have increased with each aging off of an inquiry. This seems to suggest that FICO 9 industry enhanced scores only count 3 inquiries.
So the question is, do FICO 9 Classic scores ignore inquiries or is the buffer area above 850 large enough for 3 inquires. Since my FICO 9 Classic scores are 850, I don't have enough data points to make this determination.
Equifax FICO Model 2/18/2016 6/9/2016 6/10/2016 3/25/2016 Date TBD TT # Cards Reporting Balances 2 of 36 2 of 30 1 of 30 3 of 6 # Inquiries 3 2 1 0 AAoA 9Y 9M 10Y 1M 10Y 1M 16Y 8M Aggregate Utilization < 1% < 1% < 1% 2.2% Highest CC Utilization <1% 9.5% <1% 5.1% EQ FICO 04 780 803 814 809 Auto Enhanced 04 800 822 832 827 Bankcard Enhanced 04 777 798 808 826 EQ FICO 08 839 846 850 850 Auto Enhanced 08 842 849 856 882 Bankcard Enhanced 08 864 871 878 882 EQ FICO 9 850 850 850 850 Auto Enhanced 9 877 886 892 885 Bankcard Enhanced 9 877 884 888 877
Oilcan12, thanks for the data. I added a column with my data for comparison.
A few points regarding Fico 08 first:
I believe inquiries can be binned, not just discrete counts. Data suggests a bin for Classic Fico 08 (possibly Classic 09 as well) that may include 0 and 1. Enhanced model are tweaked and treatment of # cards reporting and inquiries are likely adjusted by the tweaking.
The bin (0 and 1) is NOT true for EQ Fico 04 or Enhanced EQ Fico 08 for me score changed with INQ CT 0 => 1 => 0
- Classic EQ Fico 04: 1 INQ => 0 INQ; 796 => 809 (13 point change for me)
- Bankcard EQ Fico 08: 0 INQ => 1 INQ => 0 INQ; 882 => 874 => 882 (8 point change for me)
1) It is possible to have an 850 score with 1 inquiry. My score never dropped from 850 the 2 times a lone HP was on my EQ report. Your 6/10/2016 data shows this as well.
2) It is possible to have very high utilization on a credit card and maintain a Classic Fico 08 score of 850. Example shown beloW:
* Date 3/2014
* Cards reporting balances = 5 of 6
* Highest card utilization = 75.3% (Best Buy card)
* Overall utilization = 7.6% (including AMEX)
* TU Fico 08 = 850 (reported through Discover card)
* Inquiries on TU report = 0
3) Able to maintain Classic Fico 08 850 with 6 of 6 cards reporting. Enhanced Fico 08 scoring models more sensitive to # cards reporting.
4) Able to reach Bankcard Fico 08 900 on TU and EX with 2 of 6 cards reporting. Can't maintain with 3 of 6 reporting. EQ behaves differently [2 of 6 => 886, (3, 4 and 5) of 6 => 882]. Score shift when # cards goes from 2 of 6 (33%) to 3 of 6 (50%).
Regarding Classic Fico 09, it strongly appears potential impact of inquiries is being muted by a "buffer". Clearly, all your enhanced Fico scores show an influence relative to inquiry count as do your Classic EQ Fico 04 and Classic EQ Fico 08 scores. Based on your latest data set, enhanced Fico 08 and Fico 09 scores ARE being influenced by the drop in inquiries.
Not sure how much card count comes into play on your scores (going from 2 to 1). However, I continue to think card count, not just % cards reporting is considered. If so, your 30 cards can't completely insulate your scores [particularly the enhanced Ficos and Classic Fico 04].
Thomas_Thumb,
Thank you for all of your valuable data. The differences in the enhanced scores are very interesting.
Card count under 6 cards reporting balances doesn't affect my 08 scores. In the 2 years that I've been monitoring 08, my scores seem to consistently drop at 6 cards with balances as long as utilization is not a factor.
As far as card count affecting 04 scores, it is important to realize that there is drastically different treatment of card count and per card utilization for different 04 buckets. Most of the time on EQ 04 I have been in a bucket where scores are very sensitive to card count and utilization. In this bucket each increase in card count causes a significant drop in score. A few months ago my EQ 04 dropped all the way down to around 758 due to about 6 or 7 cards reporting balances. The last couple of months I have been in a very stable bucket on EQ 04. 6 cards reporting balances with one card at almost 20% didn't even change my 04 score by 1 point. The most dramatic example of this bucket that I have ever seen was when one person claimed to have gone up to 24 cards with balances before his score changed. That's just 2 examples on different treatment for card count under 04 for clean reports. I have heard of other EQ 04 card count treatments for clean accounts although I can't confirm. On TU 04 I am experiencing a card count treatment that is different than either of the examples I have just related.
I find it surprising when you say that data suggests that there is a 0 to 1 inquiry bin. An 850 score with 1 inquiry is not an example of this bin. You've already explained the reason why in the past. I have several examples of 1 inquiry being scored and 0 examples of a bin. For example, I took 1 HP on TU from BofA on Oct 23rd. After the 30 day buffer my TU 08 score dropped from 849 to 846. A couple of weeks later, when the inquiry was removed my TU 08 score went back to 849. This seems like a pretty strong data point. I have other examples.
I've spent a lot of time recently looking through a couple of years of data trying to find any examples of inquiry bins. I can't find anything. There are times when data is inconclusive for various reasons. Even if I gave the benefit of the doubt to inquiry bins for every inconclusive data point, I would still have 0 distinct data points to support the existence of inquiry bins. Yet, I have numerous examples of disccrete count of inquiries in FICO 08 scoring.
For example, my TU 08 point loss due to inquiries seems to top out at 16 points for 4 inquiries. Anything above that doesn't seem to count. I have seen distinct examples of scoring for every inquiry from 0 to 4.
It could certainly be possible for inquiries to be binned for certain profiles or score cards, although I wouldn't expect that to be the case.
In a few weeks, when I've had time to examine my data more thoroughly, I'll send you a PM with the results. As of now, I'm just not seeing it.
Once again, thanks for all of your data.
Just data for inquiries on different models since the topic went in that direction; difference between the two EQ pulls being a mortgage inquiry coming out from grace period. Files were fixed since I was going through HELOC app; was no score shift in the preceeding month. FICO 9 and FICO 8 shifted, FICO 5 models did not.
EQ Score | 6/1/16 | 6/4/16 |
FICO 8 | 714 | 713 |
FICO 8 AU | 729 | 721 |
FICO 8 BC | 719 | 718 |
FICO 5 | 693 | 693 |
FICO 5 AU | 690 | 690 |
FICO 5 BC | 711 | 711 |
FICO 9 | 786 | 775 |
FICO 9 AU | 789 | 779 |
FICO 9 BC | 777 | 767 |
Adding EX as well; inquiry just landed from the FU so checked for giggles. Differences between the two pulls: 2/13 balances to 5/13 balances (did not impact FICO 8 as last alert had all 5 recognized) and +2 inquiries; unfortunately I didn't get an isolated datapoint here post mortgage refinance inquiry coming out of grace period on EX; similar score shifts as on EQ, small change FICO 8, larger change FICO 9, nothing FICO 98, and the one FICO 04 datapoint at +1 is a /shrug somewhere but admittedly not hugely conclusive as a result.
EX Score | 5/1/16 | 6/12/16 |
FICO 8 | 724 | 721 |
FICO 8 AU | 722 | 720 |
FICO 8 BC | 740 | 741 |
FICO 98 | 723 | 723 |
FICO 98 AU | 735 | 735 |
FICO 98 AU | 722 | 722 |
FICO 04 | 678 | 677 |
FICO 9 | 745 | 722 |
FICO 9 AU | 756 | 735 |
FICO 9 BC | 740 | 720 |
I will have the bulk of my inquiries coming off in the next two months, may pick a bureau and see if I can isolate the changes.