cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization

I keep seeing so much contradictory info on this topic, I'm starting think know one really knows.   In particular, "Nerd Wallet" says " exceeding a 30% credit utilization ratio at any point in a billing cycle on any one of your cards could do damage."   And many previous posts here firmly state the advice that you should pay your balance the day before due date and then not use it again to afer the statement date, but that really doesn't make sense to me since cc is just going to report the statement balance that accumulated since the last payment anyway.

Are people just essentially guessing here?

Message 1 of 16
15 REPLIES 15
Hokies2379
Established Contributor

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization


@Anonymous wrote:

I keep seeing so much contradictory info on this topic, I'm starting think know one really knows.   In particular, "Nerd Wallet" says " exceeding a 30% credit utilization ratio at any point in a billing cycle on any one of your cards could do damage."   And many previous posts here firmly state the advice that you should pay your balance the day before due date and then not use it again to afer the statement date, but that really doesn't make sense to me since cc is just going to report the statement balance that accumulated since the last payment anyway.

Are people just essentially guessing here?


No better statement has ever been made on these boards. Sadly, you phrased it as a question.  But the answer is, yes.  For the most part, they are just guessing. 

Message 2 of 16
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization

People aren't guessing; however, they can only go based on their own experience and the experience of others who report trends, especially since FICO is deliberately obscure and does not make available specific guidelines regarding this.

 

Most of us can tell you that, absent any other report changes, we've seen a drop in FICO scores once we get above 10% utilization, and another drop occurs at 30% and above. Still bigger drops occur when you climb into the 50% or 70% range or higher. This factors in both individual card utilization as well as overall utilization into the eqauation.

 

While there' s nothing exact anyone can point you to that says "if your utilization is x, your score will be y", the best advice you can take from myfico is to keep your overall utilization below 10% if at all possible. Optimally, having only one card reporting and having it be between 1%-9% utilization would be ideal.

 

That's not just for maximal scoring purposes, but also for optimal financial planning. It's just good business sense. Smiley Happy

Message 3 of 16
MrsCHX
Valued Contributor

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization

Is the balance reported the statement balance or whatever random number exists on whatever random date they report?

 

e.g., My Capital One payment is due on the 6th. (paid already) My statement is usually dated the 8th/9th.

 

Let's say my balance on the 9th will be, $180. 

 

What in the heck will C.O. report? 

Capital One Savor: $6,000; Mission Lane: $4,500; PenFed Power Cash Rewards: $3,500; Nordstrom Visa: $3,300; Capital One: $2,550; PenFed Gold: $2,500; Credit One: $2,000;
Store Cards: Kohls $2,500; Home Depot: $1,000; Amazon: $350; Target: $900; LOFT: $700
Message 4 of 16
MrsCHX
Valued Contributor

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization


@Anonymous wrote:

I keep seeing so much contradictory info on this topic, I'm starting think know one really knows.   In particular, "Nerd Wallet" says " exceeding a 30% credit utilization ratio at any point in a billing cycle on any one of your cards could do damage."  


Also, I think part of this is because some cards report "high limit". So if your balance was temporarily at 80% on one card, it would look bad, even if you turned around and PIF immediately after.

Capital One Savor: $6,000; Mission Lane: $4,500; PenFed Power Cash Rewards: $3,500; Nordstrom Visa: $3,300; Capital One: $2,550; PenFed Gold: $2,500; Credit One: $2,000;
Store Cards: Kohls $2,500; Home Depot: $1,000; Amazon: $350; Target: $900; LOFT: $700
Message 5 of 16
Appleman
Valued Contributor

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization

Case reports, information from FICO and yes, some educated guessing.

 

The algorithms are protected (we can't see them) and each file is unique, but overall I believe members on this board have a pretty good view of the important trends.

Message 6 of 16
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization

The problem is that it seems odd that the rating agencies would treat revolving credit that's less than 45 days old the same as it does older credit that persists on a statement.   So when people talk about utiltization, which are they talking about?  

(Or in other words, I can't believe that the reporting agencies actually treat the two types of credit the same--the important one seems the money that you're paying interest on...)

Message 7 of 16
myjourney
Super Contributor

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization


@Anonymous wrote:

I keep seeing so much contradictory info on this topic, I'm starting think know one really knows.   In particular, "Nerd Wallet" says exceeding a 30% credit utilization ratio at any point in a billing cycle on any one of your cards could do damage."  Correct 

 

And many previous posts here firmly state the advice that you should pay your balance the day before due date and then not use it again to after the statement date, Wrong in to many ways I see 4 already .....

 

1) Making a payment the day before will not post to your account in time 

2) payments should be made at least 3 days before to clear 

3) find me a post that says not to use your card until after the statement cuts and that post is also wrong 

4) you can use your card the day before statement cuts because those charges will not post to your account and by default will be credited to next statement 

but that really doesn't make sense to me since cc is just going to report the statement balance that accumulated since the last payment anyway.

Are people just essentially guessing here? You have more research to do ....Lol


We know because Fico shares this info with us just not the algorithms used so no guessing needed 

UTL of more than 30% will ding you scores 

Total UTL over 30% will also ding you 

Total UTL over 30% with one card over 70% will double ding you score wise as that card is seen as being maxed out 

 

Having a thin file may see more of a ding in some case vs a thick file that may see very little change YMMV

 

Before you app think...
Have you done your research of the CC?
Does it fit your spending?
Do you have a plan for the bonus w/o going into debt?
Can you afford the AF?
Do you know the cards benefits? Is it worth the HP?
Message 8 of 16
Kevin86475391
Frequent Contributor

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization


@Anonymous wrote:

I keep seeing so much contradictory info on this topic, I'm starting think know one really knows.   In particular, "Nerd Wallet" says " exceeding a 30% credit utilization ratio at any point in a billing cycle on any one of your cards could do damage."   And many previous posts here firmly state the advice that you should pay your balance the day before due date and then not use it again to afer the statement date, but that really doesn't make sense to me since cc is just going to report the statement balance that accumulated since the last payment anyway.

Are people just essentially guessing here?


To the best of my knowledge this is incorrect and it is only the amount that reports that will have an effect on your FICO score. However, they may have been using the word 'damage' in a looser way. I do think that exceeding 30% utilization at any time during your billing cycle could potentially spook the creditor - depending on who the creditor is and their risk algorithms, as well as other personal factors on the account and the person's overall credit profile. It could potentially cause a lender to CLD or even close the account, which in turn could also negatively affect FICO score. So not exceeding 30% utilization at any point is, IMO, generally good advice.

 

Also:

 


@MrsCHX wrote:

Is the balance reported the statement balance or whatever random number exists on whatever random date they report?

 

e.g., My Capital One payment is due on the 6th. (paid already) My statement is usually dated the 8th/9th.

 

Let's say my balance on the 9th will be, $180. 

 

What in the heck will C.O. report? 


MrsCHX is not alone in being unsure what amount will be reported. This is a common area of uncertainty. Thus it is safer and simpler to just say, 'don't exceed 30% at all' than to have someone get confused about reporting dates.

 

On that point, the amount that will be reported is the account balance on the report date. Generally the report date is a day or two after your due date, but not necessarily. US Bank for example has a report date of, I believe, the 25th of every month. If it's not the 25th then it's another date near the end of the month. This is very different than most lenders do it and it confuses a lot of people. The best course of action is to call your lender and specially ask what the report date is for your account. For my purposes since it doesn't matter to me very much, I just assume the report date will be the statement closing date on a given account, but that may not always be the case.

 

 


@Anonymous wrote:

The problem is that it seems odd that the rating agencies would treat revolving credit that's less than 45 days old the same as it does older credit that persists on a statement.   So when people talk about utiltization, which are they talking about?  

(Or in other words, I can't believe that the reporting agencies actually treat the two types of credit the same--the important one seems the money that you're paying interest on...)


That's certainly a good point. I believe fundamentally that's a big part of the reason revolving credit card accounts are scored differently from installment accounts. However, you're certainly correct that within the revolving category, some people revolve a lot longer than others.

 

A few years ago I heard talk about a FICO change that would distinguish between:

 

Revolvers - People who revolve a balance from month to month, gradually paying it down but not PIFing

&

Utilizers - People who use an account during a cycle, but PIF and don't carry a balance from month to month.

 

It's possible I'm misremembering the terms, but I think that's right. I remember I found those terms poor choices since the words 'revolve' and 'utilize' already have other uses and meanings in credit matters. Anyway, the rumor was that if that's to be believed it would start scoring revolvers and utilizers differently, but I haven't heard anything else about it since then. So I'm assuming either it was a baseless rumor to begin with, wasn't or hasn't yet been implement for other reasons, or....it is in place and people still don't really know about it?

 

Anyway, to my knowledge your credit score is calculated the same for a given reported balance you revolve and one you PIF - all else being equal. I agree, however, that it would make sense to differentiate between the two for scoring purposes.

Message 9 of 16
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Fact v. Fiction on Credit Utilization

I am still pretty new to this credit game, but i have learned alot;.  my bill is due on the 8th. I PIF and make one small purchase. my statement is generated on the 11th. this is when my balance is reported to the CRA. if it $1 that is how much is reported.   ive been able to keepy my utilization at 1% for months now. whatever balance you have on that card when your statement generates is whats reported.

Message 10 of 16
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.