No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Anonymous wrote:
I just got a credit update that my utilization lowered to 2% month over month, when the update came through it also showed that had lowered my Equifax score to 671 (currently my lowest score out of all 3). I don't get it, I thought low utilization was supposed to help or at the very least, not hurt. I'm frustrated with Equifax : -(
When you get an alert on myfico because of the lower balances it will also generate your latest score. This needs to be considered 2 seperate pieces of info that are not necessarily related. In other words it is saying your balance dropped and your score went down. It does not mean the lower utilization caused the score drop. It is likely that the score dropped because of something else in your pull that did not generate an alert. AZEO with the one being under 29%, and aggregate being under 9% is what you need for best scores. As far as I know there is no points gained by dropping utilization from 8.99% to 2% aggregate, so if your utilization was say 8% and you paid enough to bring it down to 2%, your score would not change for that reason.
So do I often wonder what caused my score to change. My Experian fico 09 score went up 11 points in 11 days recently. To my knowledge the only change was 11 days elapsed. I pulled from myfico on the 18 of April and fico 09 score was 825. Then I recieved a free fico 09 update from wells fargo on April 29 and it was 836...no idea as to why the unexpected increase happened.
@sarge12 wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:
I just got a credit update that my utilization lowered to 2% month over month, when the update came through it also showed that had lowered my Equifax score to 671 (currently my lowest score out of all 3). I don't get it, I thought low utilization was supposed to help or at the very least, not hurt. I'm frustrated with Equifax : -(As far as I know there is no points gained by dropping utilization from 8.99% to 2% aggregate, so if your utilization was say 8% and you paid enough to bring it down to 2%, your score would not change for that reason.
A handful of us here (myself included) have experienced score changes at about 5% overall utilization. That's certainly not the norm, but it's reason to report a very low balance if it's important to eek out every possible point.
But that's not the issue at hand. The issue is that something caused the OP's score to drop, and it wouldn't have been the utilization change.
OP, how many points did you lose?
@HeavenOhioOP, how many points did you lose?
Good question, as if the OP did in fact cross a utilization threshold, which would have yielded a score gain, if he saw a score loss it would suggest that the loss came from a more impactful event.
For example, if he lowered his utilization across a threshold that would have gained someone say 15 points on average just to assign a number to the discussion here, if he saw a 10 point loss it would mean that the event/change he's looking for would be something that dropped his score 25 points. That of course would be something pretty major.
@Anonymous
I lost 3 points by lowering my already low utilization.
That's nearly impossible, so I'll be the first to say that if you lost 3 points it was from something else.
If you went from X reported balance to a balance reported lower than X but greater than $0, there is no way that you would have lost any points. Your score would either stay the same or potentially go up depending on if a threshold was crossed. It would not go down.
@Anonymous wrote:
@Anonymous
I lost 3 points by lowering my already low utilization.That's nearly impossible, so I'll be the first to say that if you lost 3 points it was from something else.
If you went from X reported balance to a balance reported lower than X but greater than $0, there is no way that you would have lost any points. Your score would either stay the same or potentially go up depending on if a threshold was crossed. It would not go down.
The only cases where I have known of something that known to be is good for a score lowering it instead and that actually being the cause of the score drop is in the rare cases of it causing re-bucketing. I have read of a collection dropping of the report as the only negative causing it, but the score actually dropped significantly. Almost all other cases are the misunderstanding of the idiotic way it shows an alert and the score change that it shows with it. I wish myfico would make it clear on the alert that the shown change in score may be unrelated to the alert. I also wish myfico would just go ahead and either eliminate the simulator or at least make it clear that it is worthless as a predictor of how the score will actually affect the scores.