cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Length of credit history question.

tag
bigtim
Frequent Contributor

Re: Length of credit history question.

 

Yeah, what the others said. When you have a good score/report, don't think of those as literal negatives, but instead they are items you can better improve on to raise your score even more. So in your case, it's saying, "You have a good credit profile, and about the only thing you can do to improve it more is to let your credit age - and keep paying your bills of course..."

 

The listing of the 'negative(s)' is simply a way to note to you how to improve your score even more.

 

---------------------------------------------------------------
Recent Cards:
12/2012 - Discover (ICL 3,375 CLI to 5,375 05/2014)
12/2013 - Chase Freedom (ICL 3,500 ACLI to 4,500 07/2014)
03/2012 - Gander Mountain MC (WFNNB) 7,000 CL
04/2012 - Ace Rewards Visa (US Bank) 12,000 CL
Back to gardening for a year or two
Message 11 of 16
haulingthescoreup
Moderator Emerita

Re: Length of credit history question.

Interestingly, the negatives are still on the reports pulled by lenders. It's myFICO that shows fewer and fewer negatives as your score rises.

Mine showed 3 negatives at 759, and 2 at 761. Every time my score flip-flops back and forth, I gain or lose a negative. They're still there all along, no matter what the score, but it seems that myFICO worries about the delicate self-esteem of FICO High Achievers. Smiley Wink
* Credit is a wonderful servant, but a terrible master. * Who's the boss --you or your credit?
FICO's: EQ 781 - TU 793 - EX 779 (from PSECU) - Done credit hunting; having fun with credit gardening. - EQ 590 on 5/14/2007
Message 12 of 16
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Length of credit history question.


haulingthescoreup wrote:
Interestingly, the negatives are still on the reports pulled by lenders. It's myFICO that shows fewer and fewer negatives as your score rises.

Mine showed 3 negatives at 759, and 2 at 761. Every time my score flip-flops back and forth, I gain or lose a negative. They're still there all along, no matter what the score, but it seems that myFICO worries about the delicate self-esteem of FICO High Achievers. Smiley Wink

 

Yes, the number of reported negatives diminishes as the score goes up. (That's per Barry.) What's not too clear to me is if the FICO reports from myFICO and transunioncs report the same number of negative reasons at the same score level, or if the myFICO reports from EQ and TU do.

 

Of course if you want to really confuse yourself and see all the negatives (personally I don't see the point in adding further unnecessary information) you can always pull from myFICO /12.

Message 13 of 16
Imhotrodcrazy
Valued Contributor

Re: Length of credit history question.

I suppose all  of the agencies want to keep us guessing, after all that is how they keep making money.  If they all had the same scoring, and our score was identical with them, we would only need to buy from one cra.  That would not be profitable for them.  I finally received an alert from SW, they are really slow.  My EQ and TU reports are identical in all respects.  When my new US Bank accounts showed up on TU my score increased 5 points to 718, however, when they hit my EQ report my score went down 7 points to 694. This makes no sense to me.  Thanks to all who shared their thoughts on this. 

FICO 08
TU 842 12/8/18
EX 840 12/29/18
EQ 842 12/8/18
(NASA 30K) ( Amex 44k ) ( Freedom 10.6K ) ( US Bank Cash+ 20k, LOC 15k ) Winners never quit, and quitters never win
last app 2/15
Message 14 of 16
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Length of credit history question.


@Imhotrodcrazy wrote:

I suppose all  of the agencies want to keep us guessing, after all that is how they keep making money.  If they all had the same scoring, and our score was identical with them, we would only need to buy from one cra.  That would not be profitable for them.  I finally received an alert from SW, they are really slow.  My EQ and TU reports are identical in all respects.  When my new US Bank accounts showed up on TU my score increased 5 points to 718, however, when they hit my EQ report my score went down 7 points to 694. This makes no sense to me.  Thanks to all who shared their thoughts on this. 


 

That's because the scoring models they licensed from FICO are not identical across CRB's. Conisder that their utilmate customer is the credit provider - perhaps they have to distinguish themselves to have some thing to sell them!
Message 15 of 16
MattH
Senior Contributor

Re: Length of credit history question.


@Anonymous wrote:

That's because the scoring models they licensed from FICO are not identical across CRB's. Conisder that their ultimate customer is the credit provider - perhaps they have to distinguish themselves to have some thing to sell them!

Yep, in many an industry participants will try extremely hard to avoid having their product or service become seen by their customers as a commodity, because a commodity market is dominated by price and convenience.  Think of the typical filling station where the most prominent information on their sign is the price per gallon of each standard grade of fuel.  I certainly have no brand loyalty when it comes to gasoline; I couldn't tell you which brand is in my tank right now.

 

TU 791 02/11/2013, EQ 800 1/29/2011 , EX Plus FAKO 812, EX Vantage Score 955 3/19/2010 wife's EQ 9/23/2009 803
EX always was my highest when we could pull all three
Always remember: big print giveth, small print taketh away
If you dunno what tanstaafl means you must Google it
Message 16 of 16
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.