cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Score comparison with identical files

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Score comparison with identical files

What happened that caused the score drops on EX and TU from the below?. No more open installment loan - yes?

 

Yep.

Message 11 of 22
NRB525
Super Contributor

Re: Score comparison with identical files

Thanks for sharing, but....

 

What is the exact timing on those 6 INQ on each bureau? I'm guessing you did not app for 6 and only 6 Capital One cards. Smiley Happy

High Bal Jan 2009 $116k on $146k limits 80% Util.
Oct 2014 $46k on $127k 36% util EQ 722 TU 727 EX 727
April 2018 $18k on $344k 5% util EQ 806 TU 810 EX 812
Jan 2019 $7.6k on $360k EQ 832 TU 839 EX 831
March 2021 $33k on $312k EQ 796 TU 798 EX 801
May 2021 Paid all Installments and Mortgages, one new Mortgage EQ 761 TY 774 EX 777
April 2022 EQ=811 TU=807 EX=805 - TU VS 3.0 765
Message 12 of 22
Revelate
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Score comparison with identical files


@NRB525 wrote:

Thanks for sharing, but....

 

What is the exact timing on those 6 INQ on each bureau? I'm guessing you did not app for 6 and only 6 Capital One cards. Smiley Happy


FICO 04 counts inquiries for the entire year (which I have data conclusively demonstrating during my mortgage process).

 

Haven't seen FICO 8 do anything different; FICO 9 is the one where I really question if something is going on given the massive disparity between my EQ and EX when I pulled it... when the only difference was a very recent inquiry on EX.

 

As for the short credit history: before people pick up pitchforks, they generally have to give you something and once you're 760+ it's pretty irrrelevant what they tell you as long as it's something which can't be argued with... 35 years could be 50 years, ergo for all it's silliness, it is accurate and therefore not an issue.




        
Message 13 of 22
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Score comparison with identical files

Can't compare FICO 08 and BANKCARD scores...

Message 14 of 22
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Score comparison with identical files

You are correct - no attempt should be made to directly correlate Bankcard to Classic scores as the models are different.

 

Nonetheless, one can look at assigned reason statements relative to profiles such as "short credit history". Point being identified "deficiencies" are sometimes nonsensical.

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 15 of 22
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Score comparison with identical files


@Revelate wrote:

@NRB525 wrote:

Thanks for sharing, but....

 

What is the exact timing on those 6 INQ on each bureau? I'm guessing you did not app for 6 and only 6 Capital One cards. Smiley Happy


FICO 04 counts inquiries for the entire year (which I have data conclusively demonstrating during my mortgage process).

 

Haven't seen FICO 8 do anything different; FICO 9 is the one where I really question if something is going on given the massive disparity between my EQ and EX when I pulled it... when the only difference was a very recent inquiry on EX.

 

As for the short credit history: before people pick up pitchforks, they generally have to give you something and once you're 760+ it's pretty irrrelevant what they tell you as long as it's something which can't be argued with... 35 years could be 50 years, ergo for all it's silliness, it is accurate and therefore not an issue.


Good question on inquiries. It would be interesting to know inquiry make-up by CRA. I still suspect all hard inquiries may not be counted the same. Some believe inquiries from credit unions (or at least some CUs) may be coded such that they don't count against score. I question whether CU membership inquires may be treated differently although classified as a HP - after all membership does not require new credit. 

 

We know inquiries can be grouped together to count as one (example - car loan shopping). However, CAPTOOL does not have an open car loan or mortgage based on his screen shots.The PLOC sure sticks out as a likely candidate for different treatment in scoring among the CRAs.

 

American Gothic.jpg

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 16 of 22
Revelate
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Score comparison with identical files


@Thomas_Thumb wrote:

@Revelate wrote:

@NRB525 wrote:

Thanks for sharing, but....

 

What is the exact timing on those 6 INQ on each bureau? I'm guessing you did not app for 6 and only 6 Capital One cards. Smiley Happy


FICO 04 counts inquiries for the entire year (which I have data conclusively demonstrating during my mortgage process).

 

Haven't seen FICO 8 do anything different; FICO 9 is the one where I really question if something is going on given the massive disparity between my EQ and EX when I pulled it... when the only difference was a very recent inquiry on EX.

 

As for the short credit history: before people pick up pitchforks, they generally have to give you something and once you're 760+ it's pretty irrrelevant what they tell you as long as it's something which can't be argued with... 35 years could be 50 years, ergo for all it's silliness, it is accurate and therefore not an issue.


Good question on inquiries. It would be interesting to know inquiry make-up by CRA. I still suspect all hard inquiries may not be counted the same. Some believe inquiries from credit unions (or at least some CUs) may be coded such that they don't count against score. I question whether CU membership inquires may be treated differently although classified as a HP - after all membership does not require new credit. 

 

We know inquiries can be grouped together to count as one (example - car loan shopping). However, CAPTOOL does not have an open car loan or mortgage based on his screen shots.The PLOC sure sticks out as a likely candidate for different treatment in scoring among the CRAs.

 

American Gothic.jpg


Well, if Verizon screening inquiries count against someone, why do we think CU ones don't?  I'm confident it's just step function / bin sorting short of anything else.  I've been pretty surprised at some inquiries (0->1) not counting as an example historically.  It's kinda hard to track because you have to know concretely what is being seen, like my experience last year going from 3->2->3->2->3 on Beacon 5 and getting 693 -> 700 -> 693 -> 700 -> 693 through the 45 day period.

 

It wouldn't be hard to test the CU theory, get clean (0 scoreable inquiries), 2-3 CU pulls and see if you get a drop in there as that should be sufficient to see.  

 

I do have inquiries falling off in July -> August, but I don't think my report is going to be stable enough at that point to really track inquiries coming off.  I'll see if I can dig out some of the inquiries on TU/EQ which were from CU's and see if I got a corresponding drop last year but my report was really too busy post-mortgage to isolate something like that whereas the mortgage process was so zealously managed I could track the minute changes.

 

Actually if I get "lucky" I'll take a drop when I chase my HELOC with DCU, but I don't know where I stand bin wise with EQ currently.




        
Message 17 of 22
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Score comparison with identical files


@NRB525 wrote:

Thanks for sharing, but....

 

What is the exact timing on those 6 INQ on each bureau? I'm guessing you did not app for 6 and only 6 Capital One cards. Smiley Happy


I doubt the timing matters, but these are the inquiries by file:

 

TU

8.17.15: Promise Financial

4.18.15: Synchrony

4.3.15: Barclays

1.8.15: Cap One

1.3.15: Barclays

4.25.14: Merrick Bank

 

EQ:

10.2.15: USAA

6.26.15: Comenity 

5.31.15: Chase

1.8.15: Cap One

9.2.14: Chase

8.20.14: Discover

 

EX:

10.10.15: NASA

5.31.15: Chase

5.24.15: Amex

1.12.15: Amex

1.8.15: Cap One

9.2.14: Chase

 

Message 18 of 22
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Score comparison with identical files

In general my Equifax has always been my lowest score. Right now it is 65 points lower than TransUnion with the same exact data. I see a lot of people with the same thing with Equifax, not everybody, but a lot. I don't know why are usually different. It's disturbing to me.
Message 19 of 22
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Score comparison with identical files


@Anonymous wrote:

@NRB525 wrote:

Thanks for sharing, but....

 

What is the exact timing on those 6 INQ on each bureau? I'm guessing you did not app for 6 and only 6 Capital One cards. Smiley Happy


I doubt the timing matters, but these are the inquiries by file:

 

TU

8.17.15: Promise Financial

4.18.15: Synchrony

4.3.15: Barclays

1.8.15: Cap One

1.3.15: Barclays

4.25.14: Merrick Bank

 

EQ:

10.2.15: USAA

6.26.15: Comenity 

5.31.15: Chase

1.8.15: Cap One

9.2.14: Chase

8.20.14: Discover

 

EX:

10.10.15: NASA

5.31.15: Chase

5.24.15: Amex

1.12.15: Amex

1.8.15: Cap One

9.2.14: Chase

 


Only thing that stands out here is an over/under 6 months difference for TU vs EX and EQ. Sure crossing 6 months should represent a non event for inquiries. I am not conversant on which of the below are CUs. It does look like TU will be in good shape next month for inquiries aging off.

CAPTOOL FICO.jpg

Recent Inquiries under 12 mo

..........10.10.15: NASA............

............5.31.15: Chase

............5.24.15: Amex

 

8.17.15: Promise Financial

4.18.15: Synchrony

4.3.15: Barclays

 

............10.2.15: USAA............

.............6.26.15: Comenity 

.............5.31.15: Chase

 

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 20 of 22
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.