No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
So I dug a bit more deeper into this, and pulled a full TU report (non myFICO version). What I saw was remarks of PPA (PAYING PARTIAL PMT AGMT), which started the same time I started this program.
As of the beginning of this month, this program has been stopped. So I hope and pray that will remove this remark from my credit file. We will see once the 30th hits...
This is from our credit scoring expert - Tom Quinn, "The reporting of “paying under a partial payment agreement” on a credit obligation is considered a derogatory indicator by FICO Scores and would trigger the negative score factor “You have a serious delinquency (60 days past due or greater) or derogatory indicator on your credit report.” to surface."
@Cindy_FICO wrote:This is from our credit scoring expert - Tom Quinn, "The reporting of “paying under a partial payment agreement” on a credit obligation is considered a derogatory indicator by FICO Scores and would trigger the negative score factor “You have a serious delinquency (60 days past due or greater) or derogatory indicator on your credit report.” to surface."
Thank you for this information. However since I have stopped it, should this indicator still be around?
@Smooth_J wrote:
@Cindy_FICO wrote:
This is from our credit scoring expert - Tom Quinn, "The reporting of “paying under a partial payment agreement” on a credit obligation is considered a derogatory indicator by FICO Scores and would trigger the negative score factor “You have a serious delinquency (60 days past due or greater) or derogatory indicator on your credit report.” to surface."
Thank you for this information. However since I have stopped it, should this indicator still be around?
“As long as the derogatory indicator is reported, it will be considered by the FICO Scores.”
@Cindy_FICO wrote:This is from our credit scoring expert - Tom Quinn, "The reporting of “paying under a partial payment agreement” on a credit obligation is considered a derogatory indicator by FICO Scores and would trigger the negative score factor “You have a serious delinquency (60 days past due or greater) or derogatory indicator on your credit report.” to surface."
I had multiple 120 days lates from a BofA account because of partial payments being made and accepted from a DMP program when they should have not accepted the payment and billed me directly. Lasted the full 7 years on my CR and I made mutliple requests to BofA for mercy.
My experience validates Mr. Quinn's statement.
@Anonymous wrote:Hi Kree:
What I was suggesting is based upon the Accounting Best Practices, Fifth Edition by Steven M. Bragg; Accounts payable best practices, Credit and Collections Best Practices found online at http://www.untag-smd.ac.id/files/Perpustakaan_Digital_1/ACCOUNTING%20Accounting%20Best%20Practices.pdf It basically states that the “outstanding interest and late fees (if applicable*) must be paid first, prior to a payment being applied to the loan principal.” This would mean that the first late month is 30 days late. In my case I stated that the next month they made a monthly payment minus $1. Now excluding late fees (which I did not mention but we all know apply), after the second month the borrower still owes $1 principle for the first month – thus 60 days late on month 1 and 30 late on Month 2. I agree that since I only used $1 dollar it would take a while to get to 90 days late without late fees; but most people do not pay all their payment less $1 per month. In reality if they only paid 75% of their bill and accumulated the normal late fees; depending on the interest rate and type of loan (CC differ from installment auto loans under the rules of 7/8) they would probably see something like 30, 60, 60, 60, 90, late (or 30, 60, 60, 90, 90 late) over a 5-month period. Fundamentally, unless they pay everything off (including any fees) in one billing cycle it is possible for the lates to remain for a while; but more likely it will increase initially slowly but rapidly expanding.
Y
You know what, I think the issue is that I dealt with property, not credit. I might have been incorrectly applying practices in a specific industry to accounts in general.
Just to give everyone an update... it was that one account that was considered "serious delinquency". Once that payment arrangement was removed and the CRA got wind, my scores shot up +10 points on average.