No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
And it appears they were right.
Let's say you have seven cards. Five of them have a 0% util, and two have 29%, with an overall util of 4%. The scenario changes from 29% to 1% for one card and to 0% for the other, overall 1%. Might we see an increase of 10-20 points?
I would ordinarily think so, but DW's EQ Beacon 5.0 remained at 817. The score isn't stuck, because inbetween she was at 814 (as was I, with my own ~817 and both of the TU 98s around the corner).
So the evidence I was looking for is in, and all hope is gone, such a terrible waste. Maybe it's time to take up bingo or cheese making.
Not at all surprising.
At those initial scores, you are in a very high scoring category, or "bucket." The changes in score vs. util are not the same as a consumer at the 700'ish score bracket.
Your weighting of util scoring may not even be the average of approx 30%, based on rebucketing criteria.
Additionally, the primary factor of overall % util, changing from 4% to 1%, is only a 3% change based on an already very good util level. The same 3% change for a consumer at, for example, the 40% level would most likely have produced significantly higher point gain.
The biggest change would most likely be the scoring of the indiv util on that one card, from 29% to 1%, but individ card util is but a part of a part of overall % util scoring, and with 7 cards, was probably not very significant. % cards with balance went from approx 28% to 14%, both still relatively low.
I would suspect that if the same type of scenario were run on a consumer score in the 700'ish range, the results would be significantly different.
The price you pay for being in the upper tier seats!
@MattH wrote:
Subject line makes me think of a poem by Edgar A Guest &emdash; and the many parodies therof!
http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/I-need-some-motivation/m-p/234028#M2478