cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Understanding long-term impact of negatives

tag
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Understanding long-term impact of negatives

The y-axis on the chart represents points lost. ABCD summarized data he gathered from surveys on lates from a variety of people.

 

I take the data points as being a consolidated representation of responses. The magnitude of drop is scorecard dependent and obviously can't be taken as a literal prediction. The appropriate takeaway from the graph is an illustration of how late penalties decrease ove time based on severity. Impact of lesser 30 and 60 day lates tapers off substantially after 2 years while 90+ day lates do not.

 

Again, not my data or graph. I don't take it literally and I don't think 30 and 60 day lates converge in impact at 12 to 24 months. Nonetheless, it is useful as an illustration.

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 11 of 13
SouthJamaica
Mega Contributor

Re: Understanding long-term impact of negatives


@Thomas_Thumb wrote:

The y-axis on the chart represents points lost. ABCD summarized data he gathered from surveys on lates from a variety of people.

 

I take the data points as being a consolidated representation of responses. The magnitude of drop is scorecard dependent and obviously can't be taken as a literal prediction. The appropriate takeaway from the graph is an illustration of how late penalties decrease ove time based on severity. Impact of lesser 30 and 60 day lates tapers off substantially after 2 years while 90+ day lates do not.

 

Again, not my data or graph. I don't take it literally and I don't think 30 and 60 day lates converge in impact at 12 to 24 months. Nonetheless, it is useful as an illustration.


Thank you. You are indeed a treasure.


Total revolving limits 569520 (505320 reporting) FICO 8: EQ 699 TU 696 EX 673




Message 12 of 13
NotTellinYou
New Contributor

Re: Understanding long-term impact of negatives

OP, you wrote that you are "overwhelmed with debt". I would be more concerned with that than your credit score if I were you. For now, I recommend forgetting your credit score and engaging a non-profit credit counseling organization that can work with your creditors to reduce or, in many cases, eliminate your interest payments to get you debt free in three years. From there, you can rebuild your credit and, in the meantime, learn to live within your means and get out of this burden. Otherwise, while you claim that the debt "will be gone in a few years" I can't see that happening when it sounds like you are making minimum payments so your high-interest debt will continue to grow and eventually lead to financial disaster. IMHO!  Good luck!

Starting Score TU: 520
Current Score TU: 820. EX: 806. EQ: 819

Chase Freedom $20k, WellsFargo $15k, Barclay $5k, BCU $15k, Discover $5k, USAA $7k, Lowes $8k, Home Depot $10k, Citi $30k, Apple $20k, AA Citi, $35k, NFCU, $25k, Arvest $35K
Message 13 of 13
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.