cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Brian_Earl_Spilner wrote:

They do use them. As a former employee at Chase, I can tell you we pulled them. 2 ficos, 1 vantage. Wish everyone would stop with saying nobody uses them. Even the decline letters will occasionally show the VS pulled.


I'd be curious to hear your reply to CGID's questions posed above.

 

Even if that is the case, you're still talking an extremely small percentage of instances where a lender uses them.  I read a ton on this forum and have rarely (if ever) have heard of Chase using Vantage scores for anything other than their Credit Journey feature.  I have not heard of Vantage scores being mentioned in decline letters, but even if that is true there are probably 100x+ examples of FICO scores being used relative to the occasional VS reference.  Anyway, the spare the dead horse from being further beaten, I'll patiently wait for your reply to CGID's post, as I'm sure I'll find it interesting.

Message 11 of 25
Meanmchine
Super Contributor

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Anonymous wrote:

No need to worry about Vantage scores, as lenders don't use them.  FICO scores are where it's at.  Pay your Vantage scores no mind.  They can fall to 400 and you shouldn't sweat it.  Continue to monitor your FICO scores and ensure they are on the upswing.


I agree and disagree with BBS. While it is true that Van 3 scores are not used in credit granters decisions, it would be nice to understand WHY your score drops as this could be an area of concern.

>3/2016 EX 644 CK-TU 642 CK-EQ 660 WalMart- 671.
>5/2025 All 3 reports 845 - 850(F8) F9s = all 850 but my app finger is still twitching
Message 12 of 25
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Meanmchine wrote:


I agree and disagree with BBS. While it is true that Van 3 scores are not used in credit granters decisions, it would be nice to understand WHY your score drops as this could be an area of concern.


If you're monitoring your FICO scores, not really IMO.  There are plenty of people on this forum that have reported profile-changing events that have caused FICO score increases while also referencing a dramatic (say, 50-100 point) VS 3.0 drop.  Worrying about that VS drop relative to improved FICO scores at the same time seems like a waste of effort.  If you're talking purely for educational/entertainment purposes, I get it.  I've started threads and chatted it up with members like TT regarding the nuances of ultra low utilization when it comes to VS 3.0, but those chats were just for fun and wouldn't translate to "concern" at all outside of simply trying to understand that lesser used algorithm a bit more.

Message 13 of 25
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.

I might be a tad cynical but i have come to believe that sites like Credit Karma offer Vantage type scores in the hopes of getting their site members to get high interest loans and CCs.

Credit Karma was still pushing on me ridiculous cards like Indigo/Gettington etc  when i already had a Chase Slate, Citi Double cash and American Express Cash.

Many fall for this scam.

So i think Vantage is not serious in helping people understand credit.

Message 14 of 25
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Anonymous wrote:

I might be a tad cynical but i have come to believe that sites like Credit Karma offer Vantage type scores in the hopes of getting their site members to get high interest loans and CCs.

Credit Karma was still pushing on me ridiculous cards like Indigo/Gettington etc  when i already had a Chase Slate, Citi Double cash and American Express Cash.

Many fall for this scam.

So i think Vantage is not serious in helping people understand credit.


Except for the fact that Credit Karma had nothing to do with creating the Vantage Score. Experian, Equifax and TransUnion got together and created the Vantage Score.

 

Yes, Credit Karma is business that makes money by pushing credit products. But that’s a totally and completely different subject.

Message 15 of 25
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Anonymous wrote:

@Brian_Earl_Spilner wrote:

They do use them. As a former employee at Chase, I can tell you we pulled them. 2 ficos, 1 vantage. Wish everyone would stop with saying nobody uses them. Even the decline letters will occasionally show the VS pulled.


I'd be curious to hear your reply to CGID's questions posed above.

 

Even if that is the case, you're still talking an extremely small percentage of instances where a lender uses them.  I read a ton on this forum and have rarely (if ever) have heard of Chase using Vantage scores for anything other than their Credit Journey feature.  I have not heard of Vantage scores being mentioned in decline letters, but even if that is true there are probably 100x+ examples of FICO scores being used relative to the occasional VS reference.  


VantageScores are widely used in marketing campaigns to target prospective customers for credit card solicitations. VS is a useful low cost tool that can be applied to segment demographics. If I managed rental properties I'd use VS for tenant screening as opposed to Fico.

BTW - VS does have a presence in the rental industry.

 

I advise everyone to check their VantageScores and learn how changes to your pofile affect ALL your credit scores. Frankly,. there is no reason not to check as the scores are free.

 

Side note: I vaguely recall a post mentioning VS in a decline letter perhaps 2 to 3 months ago in a MyFico thread.

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 16 of 25
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Thomas_Thumb wrote:


VantageScores are widely used in marketing campaigns to target prospective customers for credit card solicitations.

 

Side note: I vaguely recall a post mentioning VS in a decline letter perhaps 2 to 3 months ago in a MyFico thread.


Marketing campaigns to target prospective customers for soliciations is different than lending decisions, so I think it's worth mentioning the distinction here.

 

It's completely possible that someone received a VS reference in a decline (or approval) letter, but again over that span of 2-3 months how many hundred FICO score mentions have been made relative to that lone VS reference? 

Message 17 of 25
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.

At the very top and bottom of every page on this forum is the slogan ~FICO used in 90% of lending/top lending etc.

So even FICO admits that other scores are used, even if it is only a 1/10 chance.

 

Someone already said their credit union uses them (Baxter) and I know Carvana uses them. Which btw was the OP’s original question (auto, mortgage etc.). So the statement that no one uses them is incorrect. Is FICO used more frequently and exponential more important.Yes. Can someone ask a Vantage question without the obligatory “I don’t pay attention to them so you should not either”.

 

I just realized another solution to the OP’s question. Just look at the negative factors listed on your credit report, See if they are accurate. I still think you need to look at your actual report to see what’s driving the score not the other way around. I think you will find your TU & EQ report is different from your EX report and that’s the difference, not necessarily a FICO vs Vantage. There’s something there that you need to get to bottom of imho and not get wrapped up a FICO vs Vantage debate.

Message 18 of 25
FlaDude
Valued Contributor

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Anonymous wrote:

I might be a tad cynical but i have come to believe that sites like Credit Karma offer Vantage type scores in the hopes of getting their site members to get high interest loans and CCs.

Credit Karma was still pushing on me ridiculous cards like Indigo/Gettington etc  when i already had a Chase Slate, Citi Double cash and American Express Cash.

Many fall for this scam.

So i think Vantage is not serious in helping people understand credit.


CK will push whatever they make money on, which doesn't mean all of the offers are bad for customers. I've gotten a couple of consolidation loans at around 6% through them.

Scores: March 21 FICO 8: EX 810, TU 808, EQ 813
AoOA: closed: 40 years, open: 30 years; AAoA: 14 years
Amex Gold, Amex Blue, Amex ED, Amex Delta Blue, Amex Hilton Surpass, BoA Platinum Plus, Chase Freedom Unlimited, Chase Amazon, Chase CSP, Chase United Explorer, Citi AA, Sync Lowes, total CL 203k
Message 19 of 25
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage vs regular FICO. Chase Credit Card.


@Anonymous wrote:

At the very top and bottom of every page on this forum is the slogan ~FICO used in 90% of lending/top lending etc.

So even FICO admits that other scores are used, even if it is only a 1/10 chance.

 

Someone already said their credit union uses them (Baxter) and I know Carvana uses them. Which btw was the OP’s original question (auto, mortgage etc.). So the statement that no one uses them is incorrect.


I think that 90% number is extremely conservative.  In fact, I'd say that even 99% is conservative.  Are there lenders that use VS?  Sure, but again, it is extremely rare relative to FICO.  I think a best practice would be to generally not worry about Vantage Scores, unless you know that a potential lender actually uses them. 

Message 20 of 25
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.