@Anonymous wrote:
Thank you VERY much for the information. I had seen the reference to FAKO, but had no clue as to what it meant. The reporting was in fact, quite extensive and interesting to note that each service is kind of dancing to their own drummer (in terms of which cards/loans they monitor). I'm still a bit confused as to why there are multiple comments to NOT cancel accounts because it will hurt credit. My experience is that my score went up...Any thoughts? Best, Phil
I have seen a few other posts about scores going up when accounts are canceled. I * think * that they were from other members who also had high scores. (???)
If you had a smaller number of cards reporting balances in addition to closing those cards (these would be independent factors), this would have improved your scores. And again, it's the cards that report a balance, generally what is posted on your statements. Even if you pay your account in full after receiving a statement, it's showing that you have balances on your statements.
Did you close cards with low CL's? I've seen reports of scores climbing after canceling dud cards, although again, this could be coincidental.
And finally, how many accounts overall, open and closed, were showing, and how many open accounts did you start with, and how many are remaining? I've started seeing posts where TU in particular is giving scoldings for too many accounts. This is a big current debate, as to whether there really is a penalty, and if so, how big.
* Credit is a wonderful servant, but a terrible master. * Who's the boss --you or your credit?
FICO's: EQ 781 - TU 793 - EX 779 (from PSECU) - Done credit hunting; having fun with credit gardening. - EQ 590 on 5/14/2007