cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Score Simulator question

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Score Simulator question

Hello All,

 

My TU score is 644 and EQ score is 641.  Both reports have the same information.  However, when I run the Best Course of Action button on the simulator page for each respective report, they both come up with drastically different score  ranges.

 

TU says in 24 months, if I paydown 90-100% of my credit card debt, my score should be between 684-724.  EQ says between 736-764. 

 

Would anyone know why there would be such a drastic difference in score ranges between the reports, when the reports report the same information?

 

Thanks in advance!

Message 1 of 4
3 REPLIES 3
Barry
Administrator Emeritus

Re: Score Simulator question

 


@Anonymous wrote:

Hello All,

 

My TU score is 644 and EQ score is 641.  Both reports have the same information.  However, when I run the Best Course of Action button on the simulator page for each respective report, they both come up with drastically different score  ranges.

 

TU says in 24 months, if I paydown 90-100% of my credit card debt, my score should be between 684-724.  EQ says between 736-764. 

 

Would anyone know why there would be such a drastic difference in score ranges between the reports, when the reports report the same information?

 

Thanks in advance!


 

Good (and tough) question, gcmiranda.  That's quite a difference!  I'll see what I can find out and report back.

 

-Barry

Message 2 of 4
DustyStash
Valued Member

Re: Score Simulator question

I'm going to take a shot in the dark here, but I've always thought it had something to do with the Credit Bureaus using slightly different flavors of the scoring model, which place different value/importance on certain categories/info within report. In other words, some look more unfavorably on new inquiries, or higher balances, or late payments etc.  Its what I've believed for a while and is at least one explanation for the issue you raise. I can't think of what else would, minus a technical malfunction. And this is of course assuming totally identical info on both reports, which I must say is quite rare to see.  That's sure quite a range discrepancy for even my theory. Barry will have a better idea I'm sure.  

Message 3 of 4
llecs
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Score Simulator question

I can't speak for the difference, but IME, EQ was always more sensitive to util.

Message 4 of 4
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.