No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Kforce wrote:If one uses CC's like you and I, it is not really important. I have lowered and capped all my cards at $20,000 and a couple were $50,000 prior. Had all at 20k and the last card I got gave me 40k, had to have it lowered. Have purchased many houses, cars etc, and having capped CC limits is not an issue. It seem to also not have much effect on starting limits for me. As long as my limit is at a level where monthly utilization is reasonable and large enough for my largest monthly purchases it is good.
<snip>
Have not been able to figure what good it is having 5-10 times ones income in a credit product with 18% interest. I must be missing something.
I think you hit the nail on the head. For a short while years ago I was into the "lets see how high this can go" game, but I now look at the available credit and see no real advantage to having an excess of it. I'm not terribly concerned about starting limits with new lenders - my SO opened two new cards this year with a very limited credit history (mostly AU on my accounts) and both SL were $25k+.
I can't even image having 5-10 times my income in credit products, I'm pretty sure banks would balk long before then. I know I would. ![]()
I don't think reducing credit limits is totally crazy, @disdreamin. But as others have pointed out, it may be unnecessary in many cases and could have some impacts under certain circumstances.
Ironically, I've been focusing on higher limits on most cards in the past few years, so this is not something I see myself doing any time soon! But I'll be the first to admit that I have a very generous utilization padding on all my cards and could take a haircut on most without harm.
IMO, I'd rather have too much than not enough. As more information about how FICO scores are determined has slowly become available in the past 10-15 years, I learned how much more than just modest utilization could hurt a credit score. It actually made me a little angry since FICO wasn't developed until long after I started using cards and Fair Issac was less straightforward about the score components in early years. So I decided that if that's the game that FICO wants to play, I will play by their "rules."
For many years, I thought I could actually USE my full full credit limit without concern. Now I know that my "real" limit without starting to harm my FICO score (and possibly start lenders to react and balance chase) is only about 9% or less of what my statements show on paper. So for round numbers, I always REMOVE the last number of my credit limit and consider that my real limit. (ie: a $25,000 limit is actually $2500 for practical purposes.) My advice is that if you can do that and still consider your new, lowered limits more than sufficient for your highest anticipated spending on that card, by all means go ahead. If not, I would think twice. It's a lot harder and more time-consuming to add those limits back than to slash them.

























the only time i am aware of someone lowering their limits, was back when Internet ordering was new and there was some fraud going on
i knew a bunch of people that had a CC lowered to $300-$500, and then used that for online ordering only, so that if it got hacked, it wouldnt go very far
but with the fraud alerts and the companies reversing fraudulent charges sometimes in the same day it happened, i dont know of anyone doing this anymore
if you wanted to drop all to $20k, i wouldnt see a problem with that
@disdreamin, your limit history is on your credit report. I believe it goes back 24 months on Equifax and Experian and 30 months on TransUnion.
@disdreamin your not alone, I too have seriously thought about reducing a couple of cards I have.
Funny..... I've done searches on this forum regarding that and lets just say it's not common.. ![]()
I think the perfect limit is spend never exceeds 20% in the entire life I have the card. I have a couple cards that I only use for bonus catagories that I'll never come close to even 5-10%. Those 2 cards make up 50% of my total CL. I'm not worried about total total utilization since it's normally only 2-3% so if I lose both cards completely it only goes to 4-6%.
There is something to be said about the feeling to have the right amount of credit.
@Aim_High wrote:I don't think reducing credit limits is totally crazy, @disdreamin. But as others have pointed out, it may be unnecessary in many cases and could have some impacts under certain circumstances.
Ironically, I've been focusing on higher limits on most cards in the past few years, so this is not something I see myself doing any time soon! But I'll be the first to admit that I have a very generous utilization padding on all my cards and could take a haircut on most without harm.
IMO, I'd rather have too much than not enough. As more information about how FICO scores are determined has slowly become available in the past 10-15 years, I learned how much more than just modest utilization could hurt a credit score. It actually made me a little angry since FICO wasn't developed until long after I started using cards and Fair Issac was less straightforward about the score components in early years. So I decided that if that's the game that FICO wants to play, I will play by their "rules."
For many years, I thought I could actually USE my full full credit limit without concern. Now I know that my "real" limit without starting to harm my FICO score (and possibly start lenders to react and balance chase) is only about 9% or less of what my statements show on paper. So for round numbers, I always REMOVE the last number of my credit limit and consider that my real limit. (ie: a $25,000 limit is actually $2500 for practical purposes.) My advice is that if you can do that and still consider your new, lowered limits more than sufficient for your highest anticipated spending on that card, by all means go ahead. If not, I would think twice. It's a lot harder and more time-consuming to add those limits back than to slash them.
This 100%. What's the harm in having "too much" credit? It's not like you're paying interest or fees on the "unused" credit. Much better to have "too much" than to have "too little," and be in the position of possibly being forced to eat multiple HPs to get credit limits raised.
Now, I agree that the "hobby" some myFICOers have, of pushing credit limits to eye-popping levels - that's obviously not something that's at all necessary or even wise from a credit perspective. But putting aside trying to get to $1 million in revolving credit or some other huge figure, I simply don't see any advantage, and some risk, in asking for CLDs.
@RSX wrote:the only time i am aware of someone lowering their limits, was back when Internet ordering was new and there was some fraud going on
<snip>
but with the fraud alerts and the companies reversing fraudulent charges sometimes in the same day it happened, i dont know of anyone doing this anymore
This is why I use credit cards exclusively for online ordering and don't have a debit card, only ATM cards. Where virtual account numbers are available I utilize them for on-off spend on websites I'm not entirely comfortable with, but other than that I figure if I'm using reputable sites then part of the advantage of using the cards is not assuming the risk.
@HeavenOhio wrote:@disdreamin, your limit history is on your credit report. I believe it goes back 24 months on Equifax and Experian and 30 months on TransUnion.
Good to know, but I'm not terribly worried about it tbh. If they look and decide that lowering limits makes me look less worthy then they can keep their products/loans/whatever. I can't imagine my current lenders seeing an issue with it. I am curious where this information is located on reports. Do I need to pull directly from the reporting agencies? I can't see that info on the versions that are available through this site.
@Anonymous wrote:This 100%. What's the harm in having "too much" credit? It's not like you're paying interest or fees on the "unused" credit. Much better to have "too much" than to have "too little," and be in the position of possibly being forced to eat multiple HPs to get credit limits raised.
Now, I agree that the "hobby" some myFICOers have, of pushing credit limits to eye-popping levels - that's obviously not something that's at all necessary or even wise from a credit perspective. But putting aside trying to get to $1 million in revolving credit or some other huge figure, I simply don't see any advantage, and some risk, in asking for CLDs.
The harm in having too much credit is...well, having it. I have dropped the number of cards I hold significantly, by choice. I have pared down the cards over the past 5-6 years to ones I intend to keep long-term. I wasn't traveling as much and that made some of the cards I'd previously found great utility in obsolete to me. Others were with banks I just didn't find agreeable (Disco and Barclay, I'm looking at you).
I've gone through my reports for the highest reported balance over the last couple of years and am taking that into account when deciding on a new limit. Well, at least other than an aberrant $11k balance that happened to post a few years ago when I was traveling, that one I'm ignoring lol.
I think I'll take my chances and change my limits to what I am comfortable with. I realize this may entail risks but I'd be hard-pressed to imagine a scenario where any of the lenders I utilize will come after me for the changes I intend to make. If they do, so be it I guess?
@disdreamin wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:This 100%. What's the harm in having "too much" credit? It's not like you're paying interest or fees on the "unused" credit. Much better to have "too much" than to have "too little," and be in the position of possibly being forced to eat multiple HPs to get credit limits raised.
Now, I agree that the "hobby" some myFICOers have, of pushing credit limits to eye-popping levels - that's obviously not something that's at all necessary or even wise from a credit perspective. But putting aside trying to get to $1 million in revolving credit or some other huge figure, I simply don't see any advantage, and some risk, in asking for CLDs.
The harm in having too much credit is...well, having it. I have dropped the number of cards I hold significantly, by choice. I have pared down the cards over the past 5-6 years to ones I intend to keep long-term. I wasn't traveling as much and that made some of the cards I'd previously found great utility in obsolete to me. Others were with banks I just didn't find agreeable (Disco and Barclay, I'm looking at you).
I've gone through my reports for the highest reported balance over the last couple of years and am taking that into account when deciding on a new limit. Well, at least other than an aberrant $11k balance that happened to post a few years ago when I was traveling, that one I'm ignoring lol.
I think I'll take my chances and change my limits to what I am comfortable with. I realize this may entail risks but I'd be hard-pressed to imagine a scenario where any of the lenders I utilize will come after me for the changes I intend to make. If they do, so be it I guess?
So you're saying the harm in having "too much" credit is psychological. That's fine, and understandable, but it's not a financial harm.