No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Anonymous wrote:
@AnonymousWhat does fico eight have to do with this to begin with? We are talking about mortgages that is 5, 4, and 2.
Yes fico 8 puts more weight on credit card utilization than the older models. Notice the word “utilization” not “usage.”
Yes we do know how they are determining credit card utilization in Version 8, and we also know how they are determining credit card usage. I just explained usage to you.
Utilization goes by the thresholds you need to read @ABCD2199 ’s thread it explains it exhaustively. It’s called “the truth about credit card utilization.”
No you are absolutely 100% incorrect. Version 8 does not incorporate trended data. I thought you went and did some reading and determined that for yourself?
Trended not “trending” data uses utilization not usage. Yes it’s very clear this has nothing to do with version 8 and more importantly nothing to do with the mortgage scores.
No they didn’t go back and put trended data in version 8, they created a new version called 10T, did you miss the news? There’’s a big article in the credit in the news forum all about it you should read it.
What do you mean now that the data is available? Do you know how long the CRAs have been capturing and keeping that data? For as long as creditors have been reporting it. And for some lenders that’s been quite a period of time, some lenders still do not report it.
They could’ve modified their analysis of credit card utilization long ago, but they chose not to and now that vantagescore 4.0 has, fico apparently felt the need to make an additional algorithm in addition to classic 10 called 10T that uses trended data. They’ve been talking about this and considering it for many many years. This is not new.
When they put more weight on utilization in fico 8, that was in comparison to previous models. That wasn’t a recent change where they changed the algorithm. It has not changed since 2008 when it was released, that I am aware of. They don’t change the algorithm, they make a new one. Otherwise how would they make money? They make money by making a new algorithm and convincing lenders to switch to it.
We do know how it works. What do you think we’re doing here? we adjust spending and reporting to maximize score. That’s exactly what we do here. there are many unknowns but utilization is probably the most known.
The breakpoints are the same for revolving utilization for 1998 version to 2008 version. The difference is they adjusted the signal strength, therefore placing more weight on it.
Do some reading and research and you’ll understand what I’m trying to tell you.
Yes, you are correct that trended data is not used in 8. It is in 10 T but that won't come into play yet. Vantage 4 has it, but those are not used for mortgages. When they collect more info, they can use it for other analysis. The process is not trivial. Scoring is not simple as is made to be with articles that highlight the main points of a scoring model.
The point is, the lenders may get access to info that we don't get. The scores could be the same, but in depth information on the report may not be what we get. So, to err on the side of caution, without the risk of showing no credit card use, I report balances. If I need a boost from AZEO, I do it. Even if a lender tells me months in advance that the model they use will not generate a higher score if I use AZEO. I would still do it.
If reporting balances amounts to zero, I'm ok with that. I do not know exactly what they see so I do it anyway.
@Anonymous wrote:
@AnonymousYou admit version 8 does not have it, even though you said it did a couple posts ago, but why are we talking about 8 and 10 in this thread? This is about mortgages and AZEO and this is not helping the OP at all.
Nobody said scoring is simple or trivial that’s why we have a forum here that has been studying this in detail for over a decade. This is the reason we have utilization figured out for the most part for version 8 and prior models. We don’t do highlights here, we get down into the nuts and bolts and details. I challenge you to identify a source of better, more accurate, or more detailed information on fico scoring.
A CRA cannot provide any raw data to a lender that they do not disclose to you when you pull your annual report.
Do you want to see what they see? Go to annualcreditreport.com and download your CR. That will give you everything they get, plus the soft pulls that they do NOT get. Otherwise what would be the point of us pulling our reports and reviewing them for accuracy?
By law they are required to disclose to you all the information on you they possess in that CR. Therefore there’s nothing else they have to give to a lender, CR datawise.
Now when it comes to scoring they may get more negative reason codes than we do. They probably get graphs showing the risk rate for people at that score. (We do too on MF.) and I guarantee you we pay more for than the banks do.
Your claiming the sky is falling, but you have no evidence, not one shred to support your position.
You’re stating inaccuracies that are going to confuse newer members. Not to mention you’re bringing up versions that are totally irrelevant to the discussion and talking about topics that are totally irrelevant to the thread. What do you mean the scores “could” be the same? Do you know what kind of lawsuits that would create?
We have former and current bankers and lenders that are members they can verify this information, that’s how we know this information.
Lenders are not fico strategists and many of them probably would not even know what AZEO is. There are many testaments in threads here with lenders giving out inaccurate information for optimizing scores. So take what the lender tells you with a grain of salt when they’re talking about scoring.
No reporting balances does not amount to zero, it results in point loss once you go beyond thresholds for number of revolvers with a balance, known to be as low as 15% for some versions. And then as you grow up you cross more breakpoints and lose more points. That’s the whole point of AZEO: to get to the lowest breakpoint you can reach with the number of revolvers you have. That’s why it’s good to have at least 5 or 6 revolvers, so you can make it to that lowest breakpoint.
Why don’t you test it and prove it to yourself, if you do not believe us. We already know.
As I’ve said before, if you want to report balances, report balances. But don’t give out inaccurate information and try to stay on topic please. How does any of this help the man that’s trying to get a mortgage? We’re trying to help the OP not confuse him.
I got the models mixed up, and I'm using a smartphone and didn't catch it.
But it still doesn't change the way I would go. And I didn't say it's the way OP should go. OP is completely fine starting AZEO now for the summer mortgage app.
Differences in scores between the applicant and lender is maybe due to the version of the model. My free TU report doesn't match the lender's TU score. And yes, I get a copy of the score they use. I've seen them and they don't match. I don't get the report detail however. Maybe for mortgages you do but not for credit cards.
AZEO is work, and I did suggest OP can start AZEO no later than May, 2 cycles before applying.
@Anonymous wrote:
@AnonymousYes, the score difference is due to different models. If you'll tell us the source and range, we can help you figure out which model they are using. Common issue.
Nah, it was for my Propel. My score was around 834, pulled the same day or day before I apped. They got an 842. It got it in the mail a week or 2 later. No detail. Should I not get the detail, the full report? I just got the score and a bunch of FCRA mumbo jumbo around it.
Do lenders give you the full report when you apply for a mortgage? Will OP get a full report? OP should get to see what they saw in terms of payment history of all accounts on the report.
@Anonymous wrote:
If it was the same day, the inquiry could've done it.
You can get the full report, I explained that upthread. Lender is only required to give you the score, and then only if you don't get the best rate.
OP can access the data in his reports the same way we and lenders do: via CRAs.
I think WF uses Version 9, but I'm not positive. We should check CiC's thread to see. What model were you using?
Mine is a SP which came before their HP. I don't think that raised my score lol. SP has no effect.
I would want to see an entire CR for a mortgage app to see what the account data looks like.
I was probably looking at TU Vantagescore 3 at the time which is apples and oranges.