cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Denials Should Be Soft Pulls

tag
indiolatino61
Valued Contributor

Denials Should Be Soft Pulls

Hello all...

I believe that the inquiries for credit apps that end in denials should be soft pulls. I don't think this would harm lenders, since they are not extending any credit. It would certainly benefit the consumer. I think most people are apprehensive in applying for credit in fear of the denial and the hard pull penalty for 2 years. Perhaps, even having the hard pull lasting one year instead of 2 would be beneficial. Granted, if you are offered the credit and accept, a hard pull seems justified under the current rules. Soft pulls exist, so I see no harm in utilizing them with the exception of approvals. Thanks for any clarification if I am not taking some parameter into consideration.

Message 1 of 37
36 REPLIES 36
FicoMike0
Senior Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls

You're preaching to the choir, here. Those with reliable preapproval go along with this idea. I guess amex is the best, once you're in, no hps.

Message 2 of 37
House1204
Regular Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls

Too bad bumpage doesn't work anymore.








Message 3 of 37
indiolatino61
Valued Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls


@FicoMike0 wrote:

You're preaching to the choir, here. Those with reliable preapproval go along with this idea. I guess amex is the best, once you're in, no hps.



Sometimes the choir is the only one that will listen...lol.

Message 4 of 37
Varsity_Lu
Valued Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls

So, in Jurassic Park, the gamekeeper was really watching the animals that were probing the fences looking for breaks and weaknesses. The ones that just grazed all day by the lake were not concening. Isn't that what the HP ding does for lenders? It tells them the ones that are dangerous, vicious, and clever? They are more risky because they are probing the boundaries?

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, who am I kidding. I don't know what I'm talking about. I just thought the analogy might work.

Blue Cash PreferredBlue Cash EverydayHilton HonorsSavorREIFidelity Rewards VisaMore RewardsVoice Rewards + Perks CheckingMax Cash PreferredAAA Travel AdvantageCashRewards
Mechanics Savings BankFidelity InvestmentsNavy Federal Credit UnionHuntington National Bank
FICO® 8: 844 (Eq) · 838 (Ex) · 812 (TU)

Message 5 of 37
FlaDude
Valued Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls


@indiolatino61 wrote:

Perhaps, even having the hard pull lasting one year instead of 2 would be beneficial. 


Hard pulls stay on your report for 2 years but everything I've read here says they only affect FICO scores for 1 year.

Scores: March 21 FICO 8: EX 810, TU 808, EQ 813
AoOA: closed: 40 years, open: 30 years; AAoA: 14 years
Amex Gold, Amex Blue, Amex ED, Amex Delta Blue, Amex Hilton Surpass, BoA Platinum Plus, Chase Freedom Unlimited, Chase Amazon, Chase CSP, Chase United Explorer, Citi AA, Sync Lowes, total CL 203k
Message 6 of 37
dfwxjer
Established Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls

Denials should absolutely remain as HPs. Credit seeking is a huge red flag and indicator of deteriorating finances. 

Current active cards:
Amex - Platinum, BCP
BofA - Unlimited Cash Rewards Sig
Chase - CSR, Amazon Prime
Citi - Custom Cash, Costco Visa
TCL - $315k
CC utili - 2%
Experian - 805
Message 7 of 37
Varsity_Lu
Valued Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls


@dfwxjer wrote:

Denials should absolutely remain as HPs. Credit seeking is a huge red flag and indicator of deteriorating finances. 


It's not that black and white. I am seeking a couple of new cards not because my finances are deteriorating but rather because I want more cash back. Fidelity 2% > Quicksilver 1.5%, Max Cash 5% > Voice 3.15%.

 

By your logic everyone should only have one card: the very first card they ever started with.

Blue Cash PreferredBlue Cash EverydayHilton HonorsSavorREIFidelity Rewards VisaMore RewardsVoice Rewards + Perks CheckingMax Cash PreferredAAA Travel AdvantageCashRewards
Mechanics Savings BankFidelity InvestmentsNavy Federal Credit UnionHuntington National Bank
FICO® 8: 844 (Eq) · 838 (Ex) · 812 (TU)

Message 8 of 37
Patient957
Established Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls


@dfwxjer wrote:

Denials should absolutely remain as HPs. Credit seeking is a huge red flag and indicator of deteriorating finances. 


This is the reason it would never happen.  Hard pull denials are one of the few ways lenders can detect credit seeking.

 


@Varsity_Lu  wrote:

It's not that black and white. I am seeking a couple of new cards not because my finances are deteriorating but rather because I want more cash back.


It's not your 2 HPs they're worried about.  It's the guy with 25 HPs last month with 24 denials.  Without the HPs, this huge red flag would be invisible to them.  It just looks like a dude who got one credit card instead of dude frantically seeking any and all credit he can get his hands on.

 

Message 9 of 37
Varsity_Lu
Valued Contributor

Re: Denials Should Be Soft Pulls


@Patient957 wrote:
It's not your 2 HPs they're worried about.  It's the guy with 25 HPs last month with 24 denials.  Without the HPs, this huge red flag would be invisible to them.  It just looks like a dude who got one credit card instead of dude frantically seeking any and all credit he can get his hands on.

I completely agree with you. My example was just trying to point out the fallacy in his logic.

Blue Cash PreferredBlue Cash EverydayHilton HonorsSavorREIFidelity Rewards VisaMore RewardsVoice Rewards + Perks CheckingMax Cash PreferredAAA Travel AdvantageCashRewards
Mechanics Savings BankFidelity InvestmentsNavy Federal Credit UnionHuntington National Bank
FICO® 8: 844 (Eq) · 838 (Ex) · 812 (TU)

Message 10 of 37
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.