My friend has a Sears account and a Sears account that she was AU on. The one she was an AU on has been paid after CO to LVNV.
The one that is hers, she has some kind of agreement.......this just happened......something about the balance is put on a CC and blah blah..not sure.....but irrelevant to this problem.
Anyhow, at one time LVNV had both these accounts. LVNV is reporting both of these accounts. The problem is on the TU CR this is listed:
LVNV FUNDING LLC #565XXXXXX
Estimated date that this item will be removed: 03/2011
SEARS/CBSD #565XXXXXXXX
Estimated date that this item will be removed: 11/2009
LVNV FUNDING LLC #512XXXXXXXXXX
Estimated date that this item will be removed: 03/2011
SEARS/CBSD #512XXXXXXXXX
Estimated date that this item will be removed: 01/2010
Full account #s are shown........I masked them. They match perfectly.
So this is an obvious case of illegal re-aging, right?
If so, on the re-aging thread it said to request written documentation from the CRA of the FCRA compliance date.........if you have hard copies of CR, would this be sufficient?
Next step after that is to dispute on basis of FCRA compliance date a few times, right?
If she sends copy of paid letter for judgement to the CRA, will they mark as paid?