cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

FICO question - which is better?

tag
kroberts67
Established Contributor

FICO question - which is better?

I'm trying to help out a friend make the best move with where to apply her money.  Is it better have 2 cards report maxed out and have only those report, or to pay them down a little so they aren't maxed and have 5-7 other cards with low UT report but not have those 2 maxed out so badly?  

 

I'm advising her to pay where there is the highest APR first and I'm sure she'll go that route, but my question is in regards to which looks better/worse as far as FICO scoring.

 

TIA  Smiley Happy

FICO: EQ 814 | TU 847 | EX ? (Started in the low 500's... you can do it!)

Amex BCE $25000, Amex AP $20000, SFFCU Visa $15000 + LOC $5000, USAA Amex $6000, USAA MC $7000, Cap1 $9500, Freedom $12000, Slate $500, Barclays "RIP" SM $11500, USBank Cash+ $12500, Citi Diamond $11200, Citi Double Cash $12000, Care Credit $13500k.
My Credit Repair Journey
Message 1 of 3
2 REPLIES 2
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: FICO question - which is better?

Without a doubt she will be hammered worse for having two cards completely maxxed out.

 

The two factors you are asking us to compare (in the two different scenarios) are:

 

(1)  % Utilization for each credit card considered separately

 

(2)  number of CC's with a nonzero balance

 

In both scenarios (as you describe them) the total credit card utilization is the same.

 

#1 hurts you much more than #2, if the scenario means having cards close to being maxxed out.  If the scenario did not mean that (if all her two cards were at < 50%, for example) then it's conceivable (???) that the best approach might be to strive for more zero balances but higher U on a couple cards.  But as you have descrbed the two scenarios, it is better by far to avoid two maxxed out cards.

 

 

Message 2 of 3
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: FICO question - which is better?


@kroberts67 wrote:

I'm trying to help out a friend make the best move with where to apply her money.  Is it better have 2 cards report maxed out and have only those report, or to pay them down a little so they aren't maxed and have 5-7 other cards with low UT report but not have those 2 maxed out so badly?  

 

I'm advising her to pay where there is the highest APR first and I'm sure she'll go that route, but my question is in regards to which looks better/worse as far as FICO scoring.

 

TIA  Smiley Happy


If cards are over 90% - which is what I would consider a percentage where score impact is significant, then dropping balance on these to under 80% and picking up the difference on 2 or 3 other cards will help score. Not sure on the 5 to 7 card scenerio requirement. If all cards are allowed to post a balance that can be a major hit as well.

 

Note: If the cards are less than 80%, they are not maxed out.

 

Your advice is good. Score is not too important if you don't need new credit. Best to get finances in order and stop the bleeding associated with high interest payments - shift burden to lower APR cards..

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 3 of 3
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.