MORTGAGE SCORES - REASON DIFFERENTIAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keeper of the Scrolls of Resilience: EQ FICO Resilience Index Score Leaderboard
54 forum members have shared this new credit score. Share yours today!
I'm going to need a little help with this one.
DOES NOT TRACK is not entirely accurate, because while that particular reason statement may not be a part of the score version, it doesn't necessarily mean that bureau isn't looking at a certain value elsewhere. Like with HELOCs - sometimes these are being looked at via 'revolving accounts'.
Another thing to watch out for is something like EQ's missing 'Lack of recent consumer finance company account information'. It doesn't mean EQ 8 ignores CFAs because there is another statement related to CFAs elsewhere: Too many consumer finance company accounts.
FICO 8 - REASON DIFFERENTIAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keeper of the Scrolls of Resilience: EQ FICO Resilience Index Score Leaderboard
54 forum members have shared this new credit score. Share yours today!
FINAL RESERVATION - SO MUCH TO POST
Keeper of the Scrolls of Resilience: EQ FICO Resilience Index Score Leaderboard
54 forum members have shared this new credit score. Share yours today!
Awesome! @CassieCard You are truly an asset to the Community and the world, and I think you've met your aim!
I have no doubt this is the most complete FICO code/factor reference on the Internet!
😊😊😊
Reserved.
@Birdman7 wrote:Reserved.
lol That's cute.
I added the VS3 table that I previously posted elsewhere on the forum.
Keeper of the Scrolls of Resilience: EQ FICO Resilience Index Score Leaderboard
54 forum members have shared this new credit score. Share yours today!
@CassieCard wrote:
@Birdman7 wrote:Reserved.
lol That's cute.
I added the VS3 table that I previously posted elsewhere on the forum.
@CassieCard Awesome! Is there a VS4?
you never know, I wish I had reserved more on the other thread, so better safe than sorry I figure! 😊
@Birdman7 wrote:
@CassieCard wrote:
@Birdman7 wrote:Reserved.
lol That's cute.
I added the VS3 table that I previously posted elsewhere on the forum.
@CassieCard Awesome! Is there a VS4?
you never know, I wish I had reserved more on the other thread, so better safe than sorry I figure! 😊
I will probably thank you for that later.
Oh yes, there is a VS4 and I have a complete list.
It's around 180 reason statements, split between NEGATIVE and POSITIVE reason statements. Yes, there are positive reason statements with VS4.
With explanations on every single one of them. Long explanations. I am going to write some HTML parsing code to handle it all, because omg that's a lot of cutting and pasting plus trimming down to under the forum's 20,000 character limit on posts.
Keeper of the Scrolls of Resilience: EQ FICO Resilience Index Score Leaderboard
54 forum members have shared this new credit score. Share yours today!
@Birdman7 wrote:
I don’t think you need any help on that 8 differential. I believe that is the customization among bureaus because the scorecards are created based on the unique datasets, so I bet they are not tracking those that say do not track, but that’s my opinion.
There is your variation among CRAs.
I was thinking about stuff like this:
EX doesn't have No recent bank/national revolving balances, but it does have a more general No recent revolving balances.
So DOES NOT TRACK doesn't necessarily mean it isn't looking at recent card balances, because 'No recent revolving' might include those cards at EX.
Even though EQ/TU have both reason statements, it might be different at EX. Kind of a stretch, maybe? I'm not sure.
Keeper of the Scrolls of Resilience: EQ FICO Resilience Index Score Leaderboard
54 forum members have shared this new credit score. Share yours today!